Verified Document

Hobbes Think Is The Essential Essay

Does John Locke's political treatise "Of Civil Government" condemn or condone slavery? Give specific examples from his text that reveal his thoughts on slavery, and compare them with the state of slavery in eighteenth-century Europe

Locke condemned slavery because he valued human freedom. The emphasis in Locke's view of the social contract is clearly placed on diversity of judgment and choice within a context defined by each person's ability to act according to his own will, that is, each person's ability to act freely. Thus, according to Locke, people do not have the freedom to follow their own wills when their conduct is governed by the chosen few elite like those that Hobbes advocated. So when people are controlled by government, the possibility arises that they are not acting according to their own wills.

This, to Locke, is a form of slavery because it denies people the freedom to make their own choices: "And thus every man, by consenting with others to make one body politic under one government, puts himself under an obligation, to every one of that society, to submit to the determination of the majority" (ch. 8, 57-60). Since slavery involves complete and total power of one individual over another, it was clearly a contradiction of Locke's core beliefs.

Locke's condemnation of slavery is perhaps the most clear and determined when he asserts "Though the earth,...

The labor of his body, and the work of his hands, we may say, are properly his" (ch, 5, 25-28). It seems quite apparent that Locke did not believe that any human being has a right to own another human being.
Locke's admonition of slavery was not unlike the sentiments expressed by abolitionists in eighteenth century Europe. According to Hochschild (2005) the development of the antislavery movement began in England in 1772. Communication was quickly established between Thomas Clarkson and the abolition societies in America. Although the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery had been established in 1775 (known as the Pennsylvania Abolition Society), the outbreak of hostilities had hindered any Anglo-American connection, and it was really not until after its reorganization under a new constitution in 1787 that the society began to flourish. It was then that Benjamin Rush, as one of its secretaries, was instructed to open a correspondence with Clarkson. He was also assigned to see to the distribution of the society's constitution, along with Clarkson's recent essay on slavery, to the governor of each state.

According to Hochschild's accounts, Clarkson's essay expressed many of the same sentiments conveyed by Locke. John Locke shared with the European abolitionists a moral disdain for the practice of slavery and an understanding the mere concept of slavery was a crime against nature. Of course, there were certainly hordes of pro-slavery advocates who view Locke's perceptions on slavery as 'rubbish', however these types of people were only living proof of Locke's concerns about the self-interests of man outweighing his feelings of humanity.

References

Fiero, G.K. (2007) The humanistic tradition. New York: McGraw-Hill

Hochschild, A. (2005) Bury the chains: Prophets and rebels in the fight to free an empire's slaves. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Sources used in this document:
References

Fiero, G.K. (2007) The humanistic tradition. New York: McGraw-Hill

Hochschild, A. (2005) Bury the chains: Prophets and rebels in the fight to free an empire's slaves. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Hobbes Vs. Locke Thomas Hobbes and John
Words: 1054 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Hobbes vs. Locke Thomas Hobbes and John Locke each provide intriguing opinions concerning the state of nature, but their thinking differs when considering the form of governing that each promotes as being the most effective. The individuals in Locke's example of a government appear to have greater security than those in Hobbes', as the latter considers that there would be nothing wrong with people renouncing some of their rights in order

Hobbes and the Intercession of
Words: 3820 Length: 12 Document Type: Essay

The second part of this book introduces the more central aspect of his argument's epistemological motive, with the prescription for proper leadership extending from a view that is ethically, intellectually and socially instructed. We can easily detect here the strands of ideology which would be invested into Hobbes view many centuries hence. This is to say that at the crux of his argument, Plato writes that "until philosophers are kings,

Hobbes Vs. Descartes
Words: 1184 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Philosophy Thomas Hobbes believed that all matter was in motion and would remain in that state until and unless another force changed it (Hobbes 1651). He saw that thought reflected the motion of things in the material world and affected the senses and the brain until this new motions degraded a previous one. To Hobbes, 1) everything, including the mind and the soul, is material; 2) man is born with a

Locke and Hobbes in Many
Words: 1747 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

And thus much shall suffice; concerning what I find by speculation, and deduction, of Soveraign Rights, from the nature, need, and designes of men, in erecting of Common-wealths, and putting themselves under Monarchs, or Assemblies, entrusted with power enough for their protection. Hobbes & Waller 143-144) There would then seem to be little question as to the divides between Hobbes and Locke, with Hobbes stating firmly that they are very different

Human Nature a Comparison of Hobbes' and
Words: 3703 Length: 12 Document Type: Essay

Human Nature A Comparison of Hobbes' and Plato's Philosophical Views Trying to understand how a philosopher arrives at the reasoned opinions they put on paper is essential to also understanding what they wrote. The how is often a matter of the people they have borrowed from, but that can be an unreliable method of determining the origins of their philosophy also. Two in particular are difficult to judge using the influences they

Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes Influenced
Words: 1373 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Furthermore, that the intent of all princes should be to use all means necessary to maintain their powerbase. The works of Thomas Hobbes were revolutionary during his time period. He used his understanding of human nature and extrapolated the need for absolutism within government. The Leviathan was revolutionary in that it expounded Hobbesian concept of a material universe. His essential premise is that everything in the universe consists only of

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now