Verified Document

History; War And Peace In Term Paper

There are several different perspectives on this. First of all, the Roman society was essentially a society using extensively slave labor as the most important form of labor in existence. This basically ranged from constructions to simple chores around the house and often to farming as well, entertainment of its citizens and in other battles. A society relying so much on slaves for its own economic benefits could only necessarily force wars and battles in order to constantly keep a thorough supply of slaves available for work.

Indeed, in general, the population of a nation that had been defeated in battle would have either perished in the fights or would have been enslaved. Enslavement meant not only work in the city of Rome (or elsewhere in the empire), but also the possibility of being sold in exchange of money or products. What this virtually meant was that the slaves became a source of richness themselves.

Further more, the economic necessity of war also came from the economic added-value wars provided, even besides slaves. For example, Dacia was invaded by Trajan solely because of its enormous deposit of gold. It was essentially, a looting campaign, despite the fact that the country was then colonized (however, this lasted only until 271). This is not a singular case, Gaul was also attacked on similar looting grounds. As we can see, the economic motivation implied the necessity to wage war on other rich nations.

Perhaps a reasonable explanation for this lies in the limited capacity of the Ancient world to produce wealth outside a country. As such, despite the fact that commerce was extensively used during that time, a nation could not solely rely on that for its survival. Generally, it was either national production or, in the case of stronger states, looting campaigns. Basically, expansion and, thus, war was a possibility for the Romans to gain new resources.

Further more, especially towards the end of Rome's existence, but also before its affirmation as a world power, there was a very strong incentive of the need to show to...

The incapacity to show this would have naturally led countries to revolt against Roman leadership and to overthrow its governance. In Antiquity, a power was forced to show the other competing entities that the respective nation was stronger than any of the other and that it had the power to crush virtually all potential rebellions.
This was also the case with Rome: any sign of weakness, manifesting itself in the incapacity to wage wars on its opponents, could be interpreted as a sign that Rome was not capable of facing its enemies and would have meant its extinction. This actually happened in the 5th century, when war was no longer able to successfully wage war, bringing about its decline.

In the end, we also need to point out that this was essentially a very brutal and violent society and where survival could only be ensured by war. Historians report of entire cities being wiped to the ground (including Carthage), with the entire populations being slaughtered or, in the best case, sold into slavery across the vast empire. Such a violent society virtually encouraged war for the survival of a nation and Rome made no exception.

As such, following the argumentation previously presented, we can strongly conclude that, for all political, military, economical or social reasons, war was fundamental to Rome's very own existence and, as such, was a pure necessity during its history. Without a society thus constructed to encourage war and to successfully fight off its neighbors and other regional powers, Rome would have not been able to survive and would have most likely ended up conquered by a third party.

Bibliography

1. Millar, Fergus. Emperors, Frontiers and Foreign Relations, 31 BC to AD 378.

2. Harris, William. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome. Clarendon Press. Oxford Millar, Fergus. Emperors, Frontiers and Foreign Relations, 31 BC to AD 378.

Harris, William. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome. Clarendon Press. Oxford

Sources used in this document:
Bibliography

1. Millar, Fergus. Emperors, Frontiers and Foreign Relations, 31 BC to AD 378.

2. Harris, William. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome. Clarendon Press. Oxford Millar, Fergus. Emperors, Frontiers and Foreign Relations, 31 BC to AD 378.

Harris, William. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome. Clarendon Press. Oxford
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

American History War and Peace
Words: 876 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

As was the nature of the Cold War, the United States responded by quashing new governments that were likely to lead to communism, even where this constituted an undemocratic or even brutal instituted government (Kort 80). Democratically elected officials from Brazil, Guyana, and Uruguay were overthrown by internal revolutionaries who were funded and trained by American forces (Parenti 44). These and other leaders and governments in Latin America were targeted

War in Defense of the Status Quo
Words: 2191 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

War in Defense of the Status Quo The ironic thing about the Korean War is that it was begun (by North Korea) in an attempt to change a status quo that no party involved was particularly satisfied with, in search of an end result that all parties agreed would be ideal (the unification of Korea), and millions of deaths later ended by reestablishing the same static situation it had originate to

War and Business Talking About
Words: 1964 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

" In addition, the war in Iraq has been another opportunity to see the effects of the weapons of mass destruction, which have caused the death of approximately 300 Americans and of a countless number of Iraqi people, in the American Government's point-of-view. Even though it has been sustained for many times that "the War of Terror" is useless and meaningless, many scholars, such as David Tufte, sustain that "The short-run

War and Peace
Words: 808 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Sociologists do not see war as something humanity is genetically programmed to do, but the result of social forces. Why do they believe this? What is the evidence? If war is not caused by biology, what are some of the social forces that sociologists argue have contributed to it? Illustrate your points with concrete examples from the readings. According to Howard Zinn, there is no evidence that human beings are innately

History of Economic of the 4 Periods in Ancient Civilization
Words: 5166 Length: 16 Document Type: Literature Review

Economics in Ancient Civilization It is said that "Rome was not built in a day." Indeed, the Roman Empire was the last of a series of civilizations to emerge in the Mediterranean by the First Millennium, B.C. Precursors to the culture most identified as the seat of Western political economy, the Ancient Egyptians, Etruscans, Greeks, Syrians, Carthaginians and Phoenicians all had contact with the Romans, and eventually were incorporated through territorial

War Society Modern World War Has Been
Words: 1559 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

War Society Modern World War has been an integral part of the development of our civilization from the earliest times. It is estimated that there are more than 14,000 wars that have occurred since events began to be recorded and this has resulted in the death of billions of people. It was an essential part of the survival and behavior of human beings and the society at large. This attitude continued

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now