Using Microsoft Excel, a regression test was administered for each individual independent variable as it related to the dependent variable of general unemployment in Detroit.
Data
Automotive Industry Employment rates in thousands
Year
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Annual
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
96.9
2009
79.5
86.6
86.2
85.4
77.2
73.4
73.5
80.5
84.3
83.9
82.8
83.9
81.4
2010
82.7
82.7
82.6
83.3
83.8
85.0
81.2
83.3
87.6
89.4
89.8
90.2
85.1
2011
89.4
90.4
91.2
93.1
93.4
94.1
83.3
92.0
94.7
96.3
96.7
97.4
92.7
2012
97.6
98.2
99.3
97.4
98.5
99.5
95.8
96.8
97.7
97.7(P)
P: Preliminary
(United States Bureau of Labor Statistics 2012)
Year
Period
labor force employment unemployment
OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R
0.872748
R Square
0.761689
Adjusted R. Square
0.7319
Standard Error
1.573775
Observations
10
ANOVA
df
SS
MS
F
Significance F
Regression
1
63.32986
63.32986
25.56956
0.000981
Residual
8
19.81414
2.476768
Total
9
83.144
Coefficients
Standard Error
t Stat
P-value
Lower 95%
Upper 95%
Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
Intercept
18.60066
1.703969
10.91608
4.4E-06
14.6713
22.53002
14.6713
22.53002
X Variable 1
-0.14215
0.028112
-5.05663
0.000981
-0.20698
-0.07733
-0.20698
-0.07733
RESIDUAL OUTPUT
Observation
Predicted Y
Residuals
Standard Residuals
1
6.432287
0.867713
0.584803
2
7.398934
1.201066
0.80947
3
0.652338
Standard Error
Observations
3
ANOVA
df
SS
MS
F
Significance F
Regression
1
1.35E+08
1.35E+08
4.752715
0.273788
Residual
1
28345534
28345534
Total
2
1.63E+08
Coefficients
Standard Error
t Stat
P-value
Lower 95%
Upper 95%
Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
Intercept
170848.9
19965.3
8.557288
0.074059
-82834.4
424532.1
-82834.4
424532.1
X Variable 1
-1093.39
-2.18007
0.273788
-7466.07
-7466.07
RESIDUAL OUTPUT
Observation
Predicted Y
Residuals
Standard Residuals
1
118365.9
-57.9129
-0.01538
2
132689.4
-3735.38
-0.99222
3
132470.7
1.007603
It is clear that there are significant factor that affect the unemployment rate. As predicted, the direct employment of the three major automakers has the biggest role in affecting unemployment. As the direct employment rate goes down, the unemployment rate increases. However, it was also shown that there is not a significant correlation between automaker profits rising and unemployment rates in the region going down. This is most likely explained because of the major outsourcing the three companies are doing, costing Detroit communities a rising unemployment level.
References
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Local area unemployment statistics: Detroit-Lionia-Dearborn. Databases, Tables, & Calculators by Subject. United States Department of Labor. Web. http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LAUDV26198003?data_tool=XGtable
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Motor vehicle parts manufacturing. Databases, Tables, & Calculators by Subject: State and Area Employment, Hours, and Earnings. United States Department of Labor. Web. http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/SMU26000003133630001?data_tool=XGtable
The big three could not afford to keep up production in the United States at levels previously seen and still make enough of a profit to lead them out of financial disaster. GM alone reduced its workforce to fewer than 45,000 workers (Feeley, 2011). Most of these jobs went overseas, where labor was cheap. As such, "the state of Detroit is not really surprising given the reorganization of the
"The Detroit, Michigan drop-out rate among black males is 50%, the Detroit unemployment rate among black males is 50%" (Kill 145). This demonstrates that education is very important when considering unemployment rates and that the auto industry is, to a certain degree, not the only institution responsible for the critical conditions currently faced by individuals in Michigan. Although it is difficult to determine what other factors are responsible for the
For example, one Pontiac Assembly plant in Pontiac, Michigan, "was running three consecutive eight-hour shifts, employing 3,000 people and making 1,300 trucks a day," in 2003, but in the summer of 2009, the plant had only 600 workers and "was running just one shift" (Mahler 2009, p.1). As a result of the failure of GM, the housing bubble, and the explosion of easy credit and 'creative' financing, many Michigan
With the clear decline of crime-related activities in New York City, it can be easily inferred that unemployment rate started to decline also. This is based in the regression analysis from a different study that shows that as the trend in property crime rates goes down (from 1979 to 1997), the unemployment rate goes down with it. Trends in Adjusted Property Crimes Standardized Wages and Unemployment Rate Source: Gould, Weinberg, and Mustard, 2002 Analysis With
It showed that financial hardship which is as a result of plant closing was the main factor in negative effect on family life, Broman, Hamilton, & Hoffman, (1990). Individuals who experienced loss of jobs were more likely to face financial hardship. It argued that financial hardship was the strongest intervening variable within the relationship between unemployment and family stress and conflict. As financial hardship level rise, so does tension and
What money was available went to the downtown area. The neighborhoods were left to rot. By the 1980s many of them looked like war zones. In 1975 my grandmother moved up north to escape the racial tension which had grown quite ugly. My grandmother had four children by that time and one of them was my mother Anna. My mother never liked it up north. She thought it was boring.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now