¶ … High Speed Rail
With greater economic and population growth, there is crowding issues on existing rail lines, poor journey times, areas that have been neglected with existing rail ways, and a greater carbon issue. In efforts to reduce the CO2 emissions, the government has encouraged less car usage, less air travel usage, and more train travel. In these efforts a new high speed rail line has been proposed.
The proposed High Speed Two project is intended to reduce CO2 emissions and provide measures to accommodate future growth in the train travel industry. By reducing road usage and air usage, the train travel produces less CO2 emissions to further harm the environment. The HS2 project is designed to operate with existing lines to produce greater capacity and efficiency in services to new and local users.
The HS2 (London-West Midlands) project case alone will provide 13 billion more in benefits than the cost in benefits to users and wider economic benefits. With the new high speed rail, passengers can enjoy reduced crowding with greater end to end journey times and reach destinations in a timelier manner. The reduction in carbon emissions from train travel will enable the government to meet goals concerning a low carbon future.
Chapter 1: Introduction
There has been a growing trend in rail way use over the last decade. It is forecasted by 2026 that train travel will increase three to four times what it is at present (Anon., 2010). Passenger numbers have increased 50% and freight numbers have increased 40% (Anon., 2009). This has caused an overcrowding problem on existing trains and railways where some passengers may not reach their destinations in a timely manner. The growth in travel has stemmed from economic and population growth. Transportation has been making major contributions to the CO2 emissions problem with a 24% of the total in 2007 (Anon., 2010). The government has encouraged less car usage and a clear desire to transfer air travel and long distance travel to train services.
Chapter 3: Summary of Articles
Some studies are opposed to a new high speed rail because of the high costs that taxpayers would have to pay and feel there are more sufficient measures of reducing waste in business process. Others feel there are higher benefits than actual costs when all measures are compared. The financial analysis shows higher benefits than costs with some benefits that cannot be measured.
Chapter 4: Arguments in Favor
The High Speed Two project permits restructuring and extensions of existing services (Anon., 2011). One of the benefits of HS2 is the effective reuse of capacity. It would allow new and local passengers and new freight trains to operate as well as all services to operate without constraints. HS2 would allow for expansion of services on existing and future rail without higher frequencies and connections to places previously neglected. Services that have been lost can be regained with HS2. Revision of existing timetables would allow for expansion with a reduction of road usage and carbon emission.
The West Coast Main Line, between London and West Midlands, could reach its capacity by mid-2020s, even after upgrade (Anon., 2009). Increasing the non-carbon energy generation will increase energy efficiency with a new high speed rail line. A new high speed rail would provide increased capacity to relieve overcrowding through longer trains and provide faster, more efficient, services. The HS2 has the capacity to deliver valuable economic, environmental, and social benefits by providing additional capacity, reducing overcrowding and predictable end to end journey times, support for housing and population growth, and improving links to key international gateways.
Chapter 5: Arguments Opposed
The challenge in making substantial improvements is to increase ease and convenience without adding infracture cost and increase in the CO2 emissions problem. "There is a need to prioritize…
As the report, is highlighting several key points that are outlining the strengths of the system. The most notable include: it will reduce congestion, there will be greater levels of productivity, it will integrate the English rail system with the rest of Europe and it can improve the nation's ability to remain competitive. These different elements are important, because they are showing how this strategy will address Britain's current
Public and mass transit are issues confronting nearly every nation as well as many individual municipalities. The UK is no exception and there are currently many proposals on the docket than attempt to resolve mass transit for distance and commute that are rapid and more environmentally sustainable than individual automobile transportation. One of those transportation proposals is HS 2, a high speed train network that would connect many locations,
HS2 proposal is a government project to build a one hundred mile long High Speed Rail (HSR) line between London and Birmingham, England that, once completed, will have the capacity of carrying 28 trains per hour. These trains will be capable of 220 -- 250-mile per hour. It is projected by some experts that this line will reduce journey times from London to other cities by up to 30 minutes.
people using rail in the country has grown by 50 per cent and is mainly driven by sensitivity to the environmental. As a result the government has introduced an investment in a railway network and service improvements that will sustain the growth. This project has triggered some debate where some feel that the network is necessary and that it will benefit those who are inclined to use rail as
HS2 The British government is set to spend billions of dollars to build a High Speed Rail (HSR) line that will run between London and Birmingham. Opinions on this project have been as varied as they are vitriolic. For every person that sees the enormous benefits of the project, an opposite member of society sees the huge drawbacks that such a project can entail. There has already been a large amount
Great Depression was the single most significant economic catastrophe of the 20th century, brought on by a lack of the ability to control monetary pricing as well as a period of sustained high unemployment. Unlike modern economies, pre-Great Depression governments did not have many tools to sway the economy one way or the other, there was a long standing belief in "laissez faire" capitalism, with the premise that all markets
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now