Problem Statement
#2 The Problem
The problem with Hewlett-Packard’s (HP) vision of how to run a successful organization shifted dramatically in the 2000s, beginning with its plan in 2002 to outsource “PC manufacturing facilities worldwide, in keeping with its longstanding strategy to decrease operations costs and improve profitability” (Mourdoukoutas, 2014). By outsourcing its manufacturing, HP entered into a phase of self-destruction, inviting the collapse of its own supply chain through fragmentation inevitably caused by outsourcing. One of the big consequences of this, in turn, was its loss of market share, as the handicap that HP placed upon itself was welcome news for new competitors who now saw their opportunity for entry; HP’s product cycles were shortened, and its invested capital was strained—all as a result of outsourcing.
HP also made a number of unwise acquisitions in an effort to be relevant in the tech sector. However, the company was looking backwards instead of forwards. By purchasing Compaq, Palm and Autonomy in 2001, 2010 and 2011 respectively (at substantial cost to the company), HP thought it would be able to scale in the PC, mobile phone, and software markets. Instead of looking forward in terms of innovation to see how it could make the markets better for consumers through the development of new products, it was playing catch-up and the companies it purchased brought no real added value to the firm in the end; instead, they left HP with mounting debts (Mourdoukoutas, 2014). As Bandler and Burke (2012) point out, “the company didn’t boast a single hit consumer product even as 67% of its revenue stemmed from hardware.” Competitors like Apple, IBM and Oracle were forward-looking and innovation-focused, delivering products and services that consumers were clamoring for in the new Digital Age. HP was viewing the market as though it were still in the 1990s.
Finally, HP was suffering from a decline in the quality of its organizational culture, which stemmed from a lack of leadership. Under CEO Leo Apotheker, employees had become “disengaged” and the workplace felt “traumatized”—layoffs were just around the corner, creativity had been stymied, and workers were uninspired to perform. Indeed, workers were fatigued from more than a decade of lackadaisical leadership, from Carly Fiorina’s appointment to the top spot in 1999 to Mark Hurd’s tenure, Leo Apotheker’s aloofness, and Meg Whitman’s survivalist mode of cold, calculating cost-cutting.
Because of all this, profits were declining substantially. In the third quarter following its announcement that it would write off $8.8 billion because its acquisition of Autonomy was a essentially worthless, HP had already lost $6.9 billion (Kalb, 2012a). The company’s shares were sliding dramatically. Its leaders seemed clueless as to how to stop the hemorrhaging: From Fiorina to Hurd to Apotheker to Whitman, none of HP’s executives seemed to realize that the way to save the company was to get back to its innovative roots: this was the vision that had catapulted the firm to the top of the industry in the beginning. Now, innovation had stagnated, and the company’s culture was writhing. Executives were grasping for straws and trying a number of tricks to change the company’s image, cut costs, or focus on the bottom line. None of it mattered because HP was not addressing the most crucial issue: the matter of vision.
Manaement’s Dilemma. Management’s dilemma is that it has lost a sense of the vision needed to transform the company and pull it out of its downward spiral. Transformational leadership is about providing a vision and motivating workers to want to reach that vision. Management at HP was not implementing this style of leadership—namely because its vision had been lost and that was the fault of its CEOs, who set the tone and tenor of the company. Management did not want to continue to in the negative feedback loop the company was mired in, but it saw no way out because it was not paying attention to its core values—the principles that allowed the firm to thrive in the first place. As Mourdoukoutas (2014) put it: “Bad acquisitions drained resources that could have been used for R&D to foster internal innovation. And the lack of internal innovation fostered bad acquisitions and outsourcing as a way of catching up with competition.” Deciding how to break out of the cycle of bad acquisitions while playing catch-up with other competitors in the market was the matter management had to settle. If it did not return to its innovative roots, it would cease to have a compelling reason to exist at all. In order to get back to research and development, it would have to get its vision back. How to do that was the problem.
Research Outcomes
#3 Outcome statement
As a result of getting back to the company’s core founding principles and values, HP will be able to strengthen its organizational culture and become innovative and dominant in the industry once more as demonstrated by the method implemented by Apple in the 2000s when HP was looking backwards at past products instead of forwards at new possible product lines and services (like cloud computing).
Research Question. Why do the core founding principles and vision of a business serve as the most suitable foundation of stable growth and development in a firm and what causes organizational leaders to lose sight of that?
Research Hypothesis. It was hypothesized that core founding principles and vision of a business...
Bloomberg. (2017). HP revenue beats estimates as PC maker bucks industry declines. Retrieved from https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/11/21/hp-revenue-beats-estimates-as-pc-maker-bucks-industry-declines-2/
Hardy, Q. (2014). Meg Whitman finds a vision for HP. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/07/technology/meg-whitman-finds-a-vision-for-hp.html
Mourdoukoutas, P. (2014). What’s haunting Hewlett-Packard? Outsourcing, bad acquisitions, and lack of innovation. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdoukoutas/2014/05/23/whats-haunting-hewlett-packard-outsourcing-bad-acquisitions-and-lack-of-innovation/#29cfa2d7608c
Saintvilus, R. (2014). HP has plenty of problems and few solutions. Retrieved from https://www.thestreet.com/story/12717566/1/hp-has-plenty-of-problems-and-few-solutions.html
Zook, C. (2016). How Dell, HP, and Apple rediscovered their founders’ vision. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/07/how-dell-hp-and-apple-rediscovered-their-founders-vision
Hewlett-Packard Redefines the HP Way Learning Organizations "Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success." Henry Ford The case study, Human Resources at Hewlett-Packard, presents a portrait of an evolving organization that moved from its earliest base as a small privately owned company, with a single manufacturing focus, to a multinational conglomerate with multiple lines of business. Like many start-ups, in the early years, the company ethos exemplified that
Hewlett Packard Kittyhawk Case Analysis sub: enterpreneurship / innovation. Q1. DO YOU THINK KITTYHAWK TEAM HAD A STRATEGY OR WERE THEY DEPENDING ON LUCK TO SUCCED INNOVATION? Q2. ASSESS THE Do you think the kittyhawk team had a strategy or were they depending on luck to succeed innovation? The Kittyhawk team had a simple and usable strategy. It had three bullet points which had succinct meanings. These three points did not say what
There was also the dread of realizing that with so many associates leaving voluntarily or being let go all the work that was going to now need to be done by the remaining employees. What HP concentrated on was the redefining of processes within each business unit to be more customer-centered. Employees were specifically asked for their inputs and opinions of how to make processes within the jobs more aligned
Project Management Office Hewlett-Packard Company (HP) is one of the biggest information and technology (IT) corporations in the world. HP is a company that is well suited for the 21st Century as it employs its competencies and technological advancements to offer healing, education, and connecting individuals across the world. Hewlett-Packard Company is centered in the information systems industry and is a technology organization that specializes in storage computing, hardware, software as
Meg Whitman is the current Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Hewlett-Packard, the technology company that specializes in business and consumer electronic devices and services. She worked at a number of Fortune 500 companies and eventually found herself at the head of an Internet startup, eBay. Her leadership there allowed the company to grow rapidly and become one of the most important sites of the early Internet era. eBay remains important
Business Carley Fiorina arrived at Hewlett Packard in 1999 after having a successful career at Lucent and AT&T. Even before she moved into the CEO's office, she had several obstacles that she had to overcome. Fiorina took over HP at the height of the tech boom. Making money in technology industry had become a lot harder than it used to be and Fiorina knew that HP had to make some serious
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now