Verified Document

Henrietta Lacks And Privacy Essay

Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks Many ethical concerns arise in the story of Henrietta Lacks. Privacy is perceived as an ethical dilemma in the present times, however, at the time it occurred it might not have been seen as unethical. Skoot (2010) in the book discusses the unintentionally inconsiderate reporters and researchers who were in violation of the family's privacy by printing and distributing all aspects ranging from the medical records of Henrietta to the genetic information of the family. Such divulgence raises unethical concerns contemporarily, as the disclosure of patient information is not allowed.

Common Morality

In accordance to Gert et al. (2000), a moral agent based on common morality can be delineated as an individual who completely comprehends what is demanded, prohibited, permitted, and affected by moral rules and an individual who can reasonably accepted being guided and also judged by such moral rules. As is known, common morality is a public system and it comprises the moral justifications to which every individual conforms commonly. In particular, there are ten various moral rules that are demanded or forbidden of moral agents. These are essentially the basic components of common morality employed through the formulation of norms, which act as guiding principles for all moral agents (Gert et al., 2000). In the case of privacy violation, particularly with regard to the story of Henrietta Lacks, certain moral rules may have been violated. These rules include do not cause pain, do not deprive of pain to another. Therefore, in the case of privacy violation in the story of Henrietta lacks, the conclusion is that privacy has been violated. This violation of an individual's right to privacy is a violation of an elucidation of the rule that prohibits moral agents from causing pain (Gert, 2004).
Secondly, every individual has rights and freedoms. As ethics dictate, an individual should express their own rights without violating the rights of others. In this case, Henrietta and the family have the right of ensuring that their personal information is not disclosed without their…

Sources used in this document:
References

Bauer, K. A. (2009). Privacy and Confidentiality in the Age of E-Medicine. J. Health Care L. &Pol'y, 12, 47.

Gert, B. (2004). Deciding What to Do. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gert, B., Culver, C. M., & Clouser, K. D. (2000). Common morality versus specified principlism: Reply to Richardson. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 25(3), 308-322.

Skloot, R. (2010). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
The Business Scholar. (2014). Data Privacy: A Deontological Perspective. Retrieved from: http://the-business-scholar.blogspot.co.ke/2014/06/data-privacy-deontological-perspective.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Belmont Report to the Case of Henrietta
Words: 623 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Paper

Belmont Report to the case of Henrietta Lacks and how they were violated The three principle keys in the Belmont Report (1974) involving Henrietta's case were the respect for people, beneficence, and also justice. In respect of the people, two important elements are involved which include all people being treated as autonomous while the other persons with lesser independent autonomy be protected. With beneficence, the researchers should minimize profits while

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now