What this in essence means is that the patient would not be able to choose his own brands of medication; he must only buy what the committee has recommended, otherwise, he would lose out on his health insurance payments.
A woman who faced a problem similar to that mentioned above talks about her experience as a diabetic. She said that when the health insurance company stated that they would be able to pay for a higher priced drug to control diabetes, than the one that the committee recommended, she argued and fought it out with the company, until, eventually, they agreed, albeit reluctantly, to pay for the higher priced drug 'Glucophage.' Her experience was that as soon as she started on hits drug, she found to her amazement that her sugar levels had started to drop considerably, and that her vision, which had been deteriorating for quite some time, gradually started to return to normal. Her problems were not over, however. (Damocles; Bykin, 2004)
According to this woman, when her employers became aware of the fact that she had experienced a loss of vision because of her diabetes, they started to consider her more of a liability than an asset, especially in relation to the steep costs that the company would have to incur in term of health insurance payments and other benefits for her. She was fired, and she found herself with no job, and also no health insurance, and with a chronic disease to manage. Since she had already exhausted all her savings in trying to pay for her medications, and really could not afford to pay for her insurance premiums any more, she found that she was in a tight quandary indeed. There were no jobs available for an over-qualified fifty-five-year-old, and by the time she found a small job, she was off her all important medication for almost a year, because of which she lost her vision, and developed serious cataracts. (Damocles; Bykin, 2004)
In America today, there are almost eight percent children and adults, who live without life and health insurance, and it is a fact that the uninsured population will continue to grow steadily over the next few years, unless some sort of action is taken by the government and by health insurance companies. (Iom, 2004) It must be remembered that health care in the United States is considered to be one of the most expensive in the entire world today, and in general, access to health care is dictated and controlled by private and government based insurance companies. As far as the diabetic population is concerned, about 10% to12% is left uncovered by health insurance. (Ekoe; Zimmet; Williams, 2001)
For a diabetic, as mentioned earlier, the costs of managing the disease, seeking health care, and insurance can be prohibitive indeed, and a diabetic, on an average, spends about $13,243, when compared to a healthy person, who spends about $2,560. This is the reason why accessing health insurance is extremely important for an individual with diabetes; costs must not deter the person from seeking out the best medical care available to him. (Yu; Stjernholm; Munier, 2004) This is especially true where minorities, such as Hispanics and ethnic races are concerned. (United States Congress; Select Committee on Aging, 1992) The U.S. Health Care system is in general oriented towards the reactive treatment of disease, and as a direct result, the costs of providing health care is largely motivated by illness related care. (Clark; Cefalu, 2000)
Health insurance companies must gear up to deal better with diabetics, and in certain states, like for example in Montana state law allows health insurance companies to turn people who approach them for insurance, at will, based on the status of their health, and in most cases, diabetics are considered to be 'uninsurable'. (Montana: American Diabetes Association) Obtaining insurance cover can therefore be an uphill task for a diabetic, and some agencies, like for example, the Diabetes Federation of Ireland in conjunction with ERM Financial Services have managed to negotiate, with insurance underwriters, a number of schemes that a diabetic would find useful in managing his disease efficiently, as also in availing of health insurance benefits. Some of these are: Motor Insurance, Travel Insurance, Group specified Illness and life cover, Group Personal Accident Cover Mortgage & Mortgage Protection Facility and Household Insurance Cover. (Diabetes & Insurance: Diabetes Federation of Ireland)
Research has revealed the fact that among adults who have diabetes, almost 92.0% have some form of health insurance or the other, but at the same time, almost 640,000 people with diabetes do not have any health or life insurance. Of those diabetics wit insurance, 10.3% are covered under Medicare, 69.3% by private health insurance companies, 5.5% by military benefits, and about 14.1% through Medicaid. Among these people, there is absolutely no difference in the types of diabetes; the health insurance is...
Affordable Care Act What is the ACA? The 2010 Affordable Care Act or the PPACA (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - HR3590), nicknamed Obamacare, is the latest American healthcare reform legislation. The PPACA encompasses the Patient Protection Act, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, and portions of the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act and Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, connected with health care. Additionally, it encompasses revisions
Pre-Existing Condition and Denial of Health Insurance The focus of this work in writing is to examine whether the individual with a pre-existing health condition should be denied health insurance coverage. Toward this end, this work will examine the literature in this area of study. A pre-existing condition is "a medical condition that existed before someone applies for or enrolls in a new health insurance policy. It can be something as
5 billion in unpaid medical claims from 2005-2007 and there was a total of $80.6 million in unpaid interest owed to providers treating Medicaid patients between July 1999 and November 2007, despite the existence of an Illinois prompt-payment law. This interest is money that should not 'need' to have been spent, since money paid for interest does nothing to improve the quality of care for recipients. Another problem is a
Q1. Personal Fitness Trackers Even when personal fitness trackers present the same information, they can visually display the information in different ways. Regardless, the theory behind such trackers, and the ability to see how many steps, calories burned, and activity in relation to the activity engaged in the past, is that people are more motivated when they have concrete evidence of their improvement. What cannot be measured cannot be consciously changed.
" (National Conference of State Legislatures Forum for State Health Policy Leadership, 2007). However, regardless of state, the applicants have to meet certain qualifications. First, applicants have to be both uninsured and not eligible for Medicaid for other forms of state sponsored insurance. In addition, not all S-CHIP recipients have to be children; states can get waivers to use S-CHIP funds to cover adults. These other recipients are generally adults
Health Care in the U.S. And Spain What Can the U.S. Learn About Health Care from Spain? In 2009, Spain's single-payer health care system was ranked the seventh best in the world by the World Health Organization (Socolovsky, 2009). By comparison, the U.S. health care system ranted at 37 (Satiroglou, 2009). The Spanish system offers coverage as a right of citizenship that is constitutionally guaranteed. Spanish residents pay no expenses out-of-pocket, with
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now