Verified Document

Griswold V. Connecticut Term Paper

¶ … features and facts of a lawsuit, which establishes the right to privacy as declared in the American constitution. It highlights a conflict between a statute of the State of Connecticut and various Amendments in the American constitution. Facts of the case

Griswold, executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut and Buxton, a licensed physician and a professor at the Yale Medical School, advised couples on the use of contraceptives for voluntary birth control. Ways and means to prevent birth control by the wife were prescribed. Fees were charged and sometimes the service was rendered for free.

Griswold and Buxton were arrested and found guilty for violating a Connecticut decree which was as follows: [1]

Any person who uses any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception shall be fined not less than fifty dollars or imprisoned not less than sixty days nor more than one year or be both fined and imprisoned." [1]

And

Any person who assists, abets, counsels, causes, hires or commands another to commit any offense may be prosecuted and punished as if he were the principal offender." [1]

Both were found guilty of going against the law and paid a fine of $100 each.

Panel

Justice Arthur Goldberg, Justices Earl Warren and William Brennan were on the panel and gave majority support to the judgment given by Justice William O. Douglas, when the case was appealed in the U.S. Supreme Court. [2]

Case History

Both plaintiffs filed appeals in the U.S. Supreme Court against the decision. Thomas I. Emerson was the counsel for the plaintiffs. The defendants'...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

Clark. The plaintiffs claimed that the Connecticut statute was in conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Appellate Division of the Circuit Court confirmed their claim.
Later the case was contested March 29-30, 1965 in the U.S. Supreme Court of Errors. In the Supreme Court judgment on June 7, 1965 delivered by Justice William O. Douglas, the convictions of the plaintiffs were reversed and the U.S. Supreme Court deemed the Connecticut law to be against the U.S. Constitution. [2]

Legal issue before the Court

The Connecticut statute, which forbade the use of counsel or any material or equipment for voluntary birth control was in conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The point specifically contested was whether a couple's right to marital privacy was protected by the U.S. Constitution if a state's law prohibits a couple from using any advise or material for preventing conception.

The Constitution did not explicitly spell out the right to married people on whether they could or could not exercise birth control using contraceptives. The underlying issue contested could be stated as this: if the Constitution did not protect a particular right, could the state government curtail that right of the citizens? [2]

Facts of the case

Indeed, the federal constitution did not specify a universal right to privacy. The right to voluntary birth control is not the only right not mentioned in the Constitution. Other rights, which have not been mentioned, include the parents' right to educate a child in a school of their choice whether private or public, the right to choose educational…

Sources used in this document:
References

1] - Accessed at http://www.thisnation.com/library/griswold.html. On October 3, 2003

2] - The Reader's companion of American History. Accessed at http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/rcah/html/ah_039000_griswoldvcon.htm. On October 5, 2003

3] - Accessed at http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=U.S.&vol=381&invol=479on October 5, 2003.

4] - Accessed from the World Wide Web at http://www.aclumontana.org/rights/griswold.html. On October 5, 2003
5] - Griswold v. Connecticut -- The Impact of Legal Birth Control and the Challenges that Remain Accessed at http://www.plannedparenthood.org/library/facts/griswolddone.html. On October 5, 2003
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Protection of Personal Rights. For Instance, in
Words: 1209 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

protection of personal rights. For instance, in the case of the U.S. Supreme Court on Griswold V. Connecticut, married couples should have the rights to privacy when it comes to birth control. PROTECTING THE RIGHTS TO PRIVACY Imagine the state telling people how many children they can have, what birth control methods they can use, and blasting the personal information of individuals on the television, computer, radio and etc. Personal information

Standard Joke About America in the 1960s
Words: 3939 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

standard joke about America in the 1960s claims that, if you can remember the decade, you did not live through it. Although perhaps intended as a joke about drug usage, the joke also points in a serious way to social change in the decade, which was so rapid and far-reaching that it did seem like the world changed almost daily. This is the paradox of Todd Gitlin's "years of

Abortion and the Right to Privacy It
Words: 2582 Length: 7 Document Type: Essay

Abortion and the Right to Privacy It is a summary of the most important elements of your paper. All numbers in the abstract, except those beginning a sentence, should be typed as digits rather than words. To count the number of words in this paragraph, select the paragraph, and on the Tools menu click Word Count. United States' law is descended from English common law. As it stands, the historical idea of

Hugo Black When One Considers
Words: 3200 Length: 10 Document Type: Research Proposal

On July 3, 1969, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals entered an order requiring the submission of new plans to be put into effect this fall to accelerate desegregation in 33 Mississippi school districts. On August 28, upon the motion of the Department of Justice and the recommendation of the Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, the Court of Appeals suspended the July 3 order and postponed the date

Law and Society
Words: 1060 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Law and Society Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) is a significant and highly controversial legal decision regarding Sodomy laws in which the U.S. Supreme Court by a 5-4 majority decision held that nothing in the Constitution "would extend a fundamental right to homosexuals to engage in acts of consensual sodomy." The decision meant that engaging in homosexual acts between consenting adults, even in the privacy of their homes, could be considered a

National Security and Privacy
Words: 725 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

right to privacy is wrongly assumed to be expressly protected by the Constitution; in fact no right to privacy clause exists but is implied in the Bill of Rights. Privacy is implied, for example, in the freedom of religious beliefs and practice guaranteed in the First Amendment. The Fourth Amendment's provision against unlawful search and seizure refers to the right to privacy, as does the Fifth Amendment right to

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now