¶ … Great War of 1914-1918. The writer answers the question "Why was there so much initial support for the war and what did that do to the soldiers in the trenches?" The writer details the world's mindset at the time and the factors that escalated the situation, which in turn garnered initial support for the violence that ensued. There were three sources used to complete this paper.
Wars have been a fact of life since the beginning of time. Historically, wars have been about religious disagreements, political power, or economic need. Most wars can be traced to one of these causes with little underlying secondary foundation. The Great War of 1914-1918 is an exception to this rule of thumb. The Great War on the outside appeared to be founded in an assassination but if one peels the top layer away and examines the underpinnings one will discover a deeper, more broad reaching meaning. The Great War initially received a tremendous amount of support worldwide because mankind had recently industrialized to the point of being able to manufacture weapons of mass destruction and violence. The governments of the nations fighting in the Great War were initially enthusiastic with their new found "toys" and like little boys lining up in the yard with their toys, the nations rushed to display and show off their ability to create wide spread destruction. This new ability and eagerness to show off the ability caused men who were in the trenches to die in mass numbers. The Great War and the opportunities it presented triggered the initial enthusiasm by the involved nations and presented trench solider as fish in a barrel for the weapons to target.
THE WAR
The Great War will forever be known as the war which led mankind into the future. The Great War years separate the world into two eras. The era before the Great War was lacking industrialization and modernization while the years following the Great War were modernized and marching forward in progress (Fussell, 1975). The Great War stood at the brink of change. The world had spent its history working to develop necessities that would allow survival, while the after math of the Great War saw the world launched into an era that allowed leaps and bounds technologically.
During the Great War the initial support of many world nations for the war had more to do with that era change than the war itself. The Great War allowed various nations to flex their industrialized muscles and demonstrate the technological advancements they had discovered. Weapons such as hand grenades, machine guns, aircraft bombers and poisonous gases created a mindset of power that escalated during the initial months of the war (Fussell, 1975).
The war provided more than weapons however (Ellis, 1991). The same technological advances that provided the new weapons of destruction also provided the ability to invent the wristwatch, daylight savings time and other positive contributions to society. It also gave the world the ability to kill in mass numbers.
As the world discovered just what it was capable of the men in the trenches during the war were used as target bait to prove the power (Ellis, 1991).
WEAPONS OF DESTRUCTION
For the first time in history weapons reached technically superior heights. There were hand grenades, gases, aircraft and machine guns. These weapons had not been used in widespread capacities previously therefore the war strategies that various nations had developed were designed around more primitive methods of defensive and offensive actions. One of the most tried and true war strategies that had worked in the past had been a trench (Chickering, 1998). Service men would go into trenches, which were holes or pathways dug into the ground. They could duck and hide, as well as shoot toward enemy lines with the safety of being in...
The stench of heat and death was almost unbearable: "We lay there in the mud and retched from the stench of dead animals and watched the rats crawl over us" (Farwell 279). Farwell thus shows profound empathy for ordinary soldiers, forced to fight in a land far away from home under brutal conditions, amongst people they barely understood. Yet despite his willingness to acknowledge the role of Africans fighting
WWI and Literature World War I was certainly one of the most productive periods in literature with millions of poets and authors emerging on the scene and each one contributing tremendously to the growth and progress of literature. It is quite strange that while WWI was a deeply disturbing and a largely horrifying experience for most countries, it inspired writers and poets around the globe and this resulted in significant growth
New Deal and the Great Society The stock market crash of 1929 brought an economic crisis worldwide, and unemployment in the United States rose from 3% in 1929 to 25% in 1933 (New Deal pp). When Franklin D. Roosevelt was nominated as the Democratic nominee, in July 1932, he promised "a new deal for the American people" and thus this phrase came to label his administration and its many domestic
The world would now be required to accept socialism, Leninism, and eventually Stalinism, as part of the European landscape. With the defeat of Germany, Austro-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire; the shift in the balance of power moved toward the only major participant not devastated on its own soil by war -- the United States. The U.S. grew in economic power after Versailles, assisting not only its former allies in rebuilding,
These young men were not immersed in the high modernist traditions of Virginia Woolf and T.S. Eliot: rather, they were immersed in the experience of war and their own visceral response to the horrors they witnessed. Thus a multifaceted, rather than strictly comparative approach might be the most illuminating way to study this period of history and literature. Cross-cultural, comparative literary analysis is always imperfect, particularly given the linguistic challenges
Larissa Mom. Can I interview you for my class? Mom Sure, but aren't you getting a little desperate if you're stuck with me? Larissa Oh no. It fits the assignment. I have to interview my mother. So, first, where were your parents born? Mom My mother was born in San Francisco, and my father was born in Kansas City, Missouri Larissa Ok, and where were you born? Mom San Rafael, California Larissa All right. So what differences did you notice between your mother
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now