Government's Right To Spy And Command Our Life The Way They DoThe 9/11 attack saw over 3,000 Americans murdered by terrorists. The government was faulted, but there was a consensus that the U.S. government needed to take stern action. There was panic that made the congress to give the government fresh surveillance authorities. However, it attached an expiration date to the authority so as to allow for further deliberations after the end of the emergency. Decades later, the law has been extended on a number of occasions, yet there has been no public discussion on how the law can be interpreted. There has been an expansion of the surveillance at all fronts regardless of the freedom created by the founders of the United States. The surveillance should make us safer without violating the liberties of the American Citizens. This paper is a critique to the right of the government to spy on the lives of its citizens the way it is done by the security apparatus.
Reliance on government agencies as a secrete body of law has dire consequences. Americans are not interested in knowing the details of the ongoing sensitive intelligence and military activities. However, in their capacity as voters, they have a right to know what the U.S. government thinks and what they are permitted to do. This puts them in a better position to either ratify or reject decisions made on their behalf by the elected officials.
In a nut shell, Americans acknowledge that intelligence will at some point be forced to conduct secrete operations. However, they don't believe that the agencies ought to rely on secrete laws. It is amazing that the Americans learned that Section 215 of the USA Patriotic Act has on several occasions been secretly interpreted to authorize for collection of phone records for the American citizens on unprecedented scale. These are programs that help to identify the so-called dots. However, it is a fact that there will always be dots to collect, analyze, make connections and links. The government is in the process of collecting data from millions of Americans, based on secrete legal interpretation on statutes which do not expressly authorize such bulk collection. The question we ought to ask is what will follow next and when shall the Americans say enough is enough. Do these surveillance programs violate the Citizen's civil liberties?
The government draws a lot of powers from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. It uses the powers to monitor communication from its citizens. In fact,...
There are limitations on the destruction of wiretap records. The numbers of crimes for which wiretaps can be used, the types of judges who can authorize taps have both however, been expanded. What Does the Constitution Say? The United States Constitution states many principles of constitutional law that must be present in for Democracy to truly exist. Democracy is characterized by freedom and liberty to think and believe individually and the
Right to Privacy Being a citizen of the United States comes with many benefits in comparison to citizenship in other countries. Through the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights we are granted certain rights -- the right to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of assembly -- just to name a few. However, despite the 27 amendments the Bill of Rights that guarantee American protections
However, from the principles of the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the Revolution gradually changed its course when it was governed by the Committee of Public Safety. In what later became known as the Terror, Robespierre enforced a regime of revolutionary 'correctness.' While the original intention of the Revolution may have been to equalize the relationship between the estates (and did not even have the express intention of overthrowing
The contention that politics by innuendo, unethical conduct, and moral decay are somehow strictly modern phenomena is patently false. If anything, increased public scrutiny, partially made possible through new technologies, may make it more difficult for such ethical abuses to take place for long. Bibliography Adams, G.B. (1993). Ethics and the Chimera of Professionalism: The Historical Context of an Oxymoronic Relationship. The American Review of Public Administration, 117-139. Anechiarico, F. (1994). Visions of
Client server systems are a group of inter-related subsystems which collaborate together to provide a specific solution or service. This computing model structures diverse and distributed applications, which separates tasks between the providers (servers) and service seekers (clients). Keeping the purpose of this paper in view, the provider-server is the Geographical Informative System and the client is the U.S. government. This paper analyzes Geographical Informative System (GIS) as its client
Powers and Rights of the Constitution INSTITUTIONAL POWER: The Constitution gives the federal government the right to form a military service, including what is now the National Guard (Army National Guard, 2011), though it does so in cooperation with the states and localities to serve their interests as well. This section is important for a number of reasons, including the fact that it reinforces the differences between the state and
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now