5 degrees Centigrade per century since about 1750, as the world recovers from the little ice age." (Evans, Global Research, 2009
Global temperatures cooled off from 1940 through the late 1970's, which refutes the casual relationship earlier defined by scientists between rises in CO2 levels and global warming. Tsonis also points to a Washington Post article from 1922 that reports Greenland glaciers to be fast disappearing and arctic seals not engaging their warmer waters. Subsequently the period from the 1980's to 2000 showed an aggressive rise in temperature. Tsonis does agree to an element of human activity and greenhouse gas that contributes to the MDO cycle but does not believe in predictions of catastrophe associated with Global Warming. He further states that we may see reports of an on setting ice age by the early 2030's, as the MDO's shift causing temperatures to rise once again. The politics of the prevailing Global Warming theory is evident in governmental budgets. Dr. David Viner, formerly of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit claims snow will become scarce to the U.K if not globally. "Children just aren't going to know what snow is." (Rose, Viner, 2000)
Conclusion:
The trend appears to be cyclical, with the cycles of warming and cooling exhibiting a higher standard deviation and variance every 20 to 30 years. The warming appears to push the extreme of warm temperatures globally, both as an annual average and the daily high temperature, and likewise for the cooling period. This most recent warming phase (1980 to 2000) appears to have involved a more severe warming phase that the previous warming phase, and the previous cooling phase (1940 to late 1970) evidenced as being more severe than its' previous as well, with winter's annually blanketing the northeast U.S. continuously with feet of snow. The multi-billion dollar notion of Global Warming appears to be only conditionally true and not linked statistically significantly to greenhouse gas emission. As nature often does act in cycles, the research linking global warming and global cooling as a "Ying/Yang" relationship does support the global warming idea under constraints as a function of time. However, this is inconsistent with the accepted notion of Global Warming defined. "Some scientists...
He sees it as a warming trend which will eventually reverse itself as the solar cycle's peak in the next 1500-year (Singer and Avery, 2007). This coupled with the fact that humans have never before been able to scientifically measure these cycles, shows that global warming is a theory without merit. Other scientists disagree with the global warming and cooling trend theory and posit that the recent warming in the
" Monitoring and enforcing a [CO.sub.2] treaty would be very difficult, if not impossible. Reductions in [CO.sub.2] emissions by rich countries could be negated by increased [CO.sub.2] emissions in fast-growing developing countries (Udall, 1990)." One of the issues facing the global warming crisis is the debate about who is most responsible for its creation and who should be financially responsible for its curbing. According to recently gathered data Americans are causing a much
These effects would be unfairly harsh on developing nations, who had little to do with creating the problem; this is one of the reasons that recent international talks in Copenhagen have stalled (WGW 2009). Not only would these countries not be able to develop as quickly and have healthier populations and more stable governments, but industrialized nations would also see negative economic impacts, making many wary of making any
What Marshall does to bolster his argument that Global Warming is a sham is quote from scientists and experts in the field who are doubters; for example, Dr. Boris Winterhaiter, a professor of marine geology in Australia, claims that Al Gore's movie is full of "circumstantial arguments." And those arguments, Winterhaiter is quoted as saying, "are so weak that they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that they, and his film, are commanding public attention," the
While we know that global warming would no doubt, at the levels Epstein cites, be conditions for increased disease and even death; there is no sufficient data to suggest that global warming is going to reach the levels that Epstein is suggesting in his article. His article is alarmist in nature. Schneider's (2002) article, in contrast to Epstein's, relies heavily on scientific data, pointing out that existing data is inconclusive
Specifically, it has risen a full degree since 1957 (Crittenden & White, 2010; Muller, 2008). Similarly, there is no doubt that carbon dioxide levels have also risen significantly, thirty-six percent since their first recording (Muller, 2008). Proponents of the global warming hypothesis argue that this increasing level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is a cause of the greenhouse effect that traps warmth under the lower layers of the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now