¶ … failed state is never able to sustain itself as a members of the international community (Helman & Rathner,1993).Rotberg (2002) pointed out that state failure can occur in various dimensions. These dimensions include security, political representation, economic prosperity as well as the distribution of income (Rotberg,2002,p.85).His argument is that nations that failure of states occurs as a result of their failure to deliver positive political gains to their citizens. These governments therefore end up losing their legitimacy and amidst the growing citizens plurality, they become illegitimate. Rotberg further pointed out that the collapsed state / failed state marks the final stage of a nation's failure (he gave Somalia as an example).The failure can occur simultaneously on all dimensions.
The role of Western nations and multinationals in state failure
The role of western nations and multinational corporations in the failure of states has been noted.A normal and functional sovereign state is expected to effectively perform certain minimal functions aimed at ensuring that both security as well as the well-being of the citizens is ensured. The state should also ensure the smooth running within the international system. Extant literature has been dedicated to the identification of the factors that leads to a state not being able to perform its main Weberian functions. The states that do not meet the minimum are deemed 'weak', 'poorly performing' or 'fragile' as pointed out by Torres & Anderson (2004,p.5). The failed states are the most dangerous states to international security and stability. This is because they served as perfect incubators for war and terrorist related activities that seem to affect the global security negatively.
Various western and non-western as well as multinational corporations have been noted to aid the slip of natural-resource bearing states to anarchy and state failure. This is through the concept of resource curse" that aff3ects countries that derive a huge portion of their total income from the exportation of high-value natural resources like oil, metals as well as gems. This is more notable in African countries such as Sierra Leone in which the "blood diamond" caused a decade of civil war. Wenar (2011) pointed out that there exists a correlation between the natural resources in failed states and pathologies such as corruption, authoritarianism, economic dysfunction and civil conflicts as noted in the five main African exporters of oil; Nigeria, Sudan, Angola, Algeria and Libya. This trend is not only in Africa. It can be noted in non-African states such as Burma, Turkemistan and Yemen. At the moment, there is not empirical study or evidence to directly link the western nations and corporations with state failures. All that exists are a myriad of conspiracy theories (Becker,2002).
Colonialism
The Western former colonial masters have also been noted to be responsible for state failure through their massive natural resource grab (Murray,2006).These colonial masters use destabilization and demonisation in their quest to grab minerals in these states.The consequence is a failure or weakening of these states. Example is the destabilization of Timor Leste by the Australian government and other western powers through class collaboration.
The security concerns due to a failed state
The security risks and threats posed by a failed state can be shown to occur at different levels. These threats to security can be noted at local, regional and international levels. The international studies of states that are fragile are usually aimed at the examination of the potential conflict in these states. This is due to the effects that these stability concerns have on the international systems and relations. This is to say that the poor state of security in fragile states is of concern to the international community due to the security threat that they pose to other states. Carment et. al. (2010) pointed out that the interest of the citizens living in the fragile states is never of primary concern but the effect that the threats pose to the international community. Hededam, Van Der Aa Kuhle and Olsen (2010) pointed out that the study of the fragile states should contain an analysis of the threats that they pose to the international...
Cold War was a period of great danger and international tension, brought on by the power struggles between the United States and the Soviet Union. The communist ideology -- which the Soviets were aggressively trying to spread through Europe and elsewhere -- was seen as an enormous threat to the U.S., while the capitalist / democratic ideology was seen by the Soviets as a threat to their way of life
Deterrence in the Post-Cold War Era The same types of deterrence strategies that were used to good effect in the Cold War may not be as effective against non-state actors as with nation states in the 21st century. This paper discusses the factors involved in developing timely and effective responses to non-state actors to determine whether the concepts of cumulative deterrence and/or tailored deterrence can also be effective against non-state actors
America and the Post Cold War World This work of non-fiction authored by Chollet and Goldgeiger chronicles a pivotal epoch in United States history, which was marked by the end of the Cold War and the beginning of the purported War on Terror. The authors dedicate most of the manuscript to the foreign policy and international developments that America faced during this interim between major, time-consuming wars. Nonetheless, there are some
Cold War Polarity constitutes a system-level notion which associates with the distribution of power, actual or apparent, within the international system. For roughly the first 350 years of its being which means from about the culmination of 16th century to the middle part of 20th century -- that system had been a multipolar, with five, or six or seven powers of approximately analogous might continually manipulating for gains. Thereafter, since the middle
S.S.R., which would ostensibly eliminate the threat posed by the U.S.S.R.'s capabilities. The report takes on a tone almost encouraging that to happen. It was very much the public mood of the time that would have supported that initiative. That the world came so close to the use of nuclear confrontation during the Cuban Missile Crisis is indicative of this, and it was only the ability of JFK to resist
That intervention considered, it is fair to say that on the one hand, the fact that the U.S. came out as the winner of the Cold War was obvious, and on the other hand that a certain change had occurred in terms of the rule of the international law. The following years saw an increase in the intrastate violence, taking into account the Somalia crisis, the situations in South Africa,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now