Gender Communications
The research question examined in this study poses the following question: "How does one person's behavior affect another person's behavior?" Specifically, this study is intended to assess the various mechanisms through which people communicate, both verbally and non-verbally. The study is intended to examine the different methods in which males vs. females communicate, and explore whether a difference in gender correlates with a different approach to communicate. Also examined is whether or not males or females are likely to be influenced by each others communication cues, and whether one gender is more influenced by certain settings/cues than the other.
Non-participant observation was the methodology selected for this study. Specifically, in order to best assess and observe gender relationships, our group decided to split the observations between two social settings: bars where people might "hang out" casually and the student center. Four members of our group went to Pete's Bar/Scarlet Pub in New Brunswick on Thursday, January 29, 2004 at eleven o'clock p.m., and three members of the group went to the College Avenue Student Center at one o'clock in the afternoon on Friday, January 30th. Each group member at the bar dispersed into separate sections of the bar in order to allow observation of various aspects of gender relationships. Observers either focused on specific people and relationships occurring in the bar, or the entire bar as a social setting. At the student center, three group members dispersed themselves about the food court to observe specific gender relationshiops.
The non-participant observational methodology was appropriate for use in this study for several reasons. As Herbert Spiegelberg described observations and demonstrations, reflections acquired through observation "produce reflections through which the strangeness of an obstinately familiar world can be detected" (Source 2: 38). The purpose of non-participant observation is to entitle the persons being observed the right to "conduct their common conversational affairs without interference" (Source 2: 42).
A departure from this methodology might elicit an attempt by an observer to "restore a right state of affairs" or engage observers in a manner that would disrupt the normal course of events. Participation by observers might in fact result in "skewed" results, and the participant is likely to inflict some of his or her own insights regarding the potential outcome of observations whether intentionally or unintentionally amongst group members or individuals being observed.
PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS
The two patterns that emerged from the data collected by observers are as follows:
1. Nonverbal communication such as touch and eye contact is the factor that traditionally initiates a conversation between males and females.
2. Individuals are heavily influenced by the behavior of their friends and the reactions of friends when they are in the presence of the other gender.
Several examples of communication initiation via non-verbal cues were evident throughout the observational period. This was most apparent in observations gained from strangers in a bar setting. The observations made in the bar are most appropriate to this theme, because the majority of individuals of opposite genders interacting in the bar were strangers at first. When observing males and females that were not together in the bar, including those sitting at opposite ends of the bar, it became immediately apparent that eye contact and other non-verbal cues were traditionally the first point of contact. Conversation between males and females often seemed to start with a touch, gaze or smile which was subsequently followed by verbal communication of some sort.
Perhaps the best example of this is perhaps made by observing the bartender at the bar, who required eye contact as the initiating factor before serving a customer, regardless of whether that customer was male or female.
One observation noticed that supports the premise of non-verbal cues as the initiator of conversation between the sexes is a situation where males consistently "accidentally" or "innocently" touched the bodies of females passing by in an attempt to engage them in conversation. Case in point: in one instance, a group of three males were waiting to be served some drinks at the bar. One of the men was ordering and paying for drinks, and serving them to friends who all drank simultaneously. A woman was attempting to push her way through the crowd to the bar, and had to pass by this group of men. One of the guys had mentioned to his friends that he found her attractive. This individual, when noticing that the attractive woman was trying to move past him, only moved just enough for her to squeeze by while he rubbed up against her slightly. This while initially might appear to be an accident, was staged,...
In a situation where the domain of the opposite gender is simply different than that of the other this can occur. Using the previous stereotypical example when a woman drones on and on about some aspect of cooking that is important to her but not to the male listener in the room, the quite participant may simply "tune out" and the same is true of a man speaking within
Men tend to talk more than women do and have habit of talking over them or interrupting them when they are speaking. In the nonverbal sense, some the differences from men and women are the majority of men do not interpret body language, a nod from a woman means to a man that she agrees with what he is saying and that she is listening to what he is saying.
Gender Communication and Language In the "enlightened" age of the 21st century, it appears logical to assume that men and women are finally accepted as equally competent and intelligent, both in the workplace and social settings. It is therefore interestingly shocking that communication studies reveal wide-ranging differences in the way in which men and women communicate. Many of these communication styles date from social systems where women were seen as incompetent
This means that in so much as a direct and solution-oriented conversational style is preferred in the business setting, it does not mean that this style is the most efficient. There are "cultures" or other sectors in the business environment that uses female communication style because they are able to appeal more to the people or audience. A woman handling a focus group discussion on a product may be
Communication and Gender in Movies Cinematic Gender Communication Gender plays a fairly important role in regards to communication and its effectiveness and nuances. This fact is largely due to the immense value which people have always placed upon language, which can be thought of as a means of identifying and, in some instances, even defining what it means to be of a particular gender since "communication is thought to be, at once,
Communication theory is described as any systematic explanations of the nature of the communication process. It's important for businesses and organizations to understand communication theory because they can't accomplish their objectives and goals without effective communication between workers. Since it focuses on analyzing the processes with which information is transmitted from the sender to the receiver, communication theory also focuses on the various ways with which information is transferred from
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now