Verified Document

Gays In The Military Coming Research Paper

It also incorporated the findings of scientific literature on group cohesion, sexuality and relevant health and legal issues and their implementation. Only one policy would fulfill the President's directive. It would consider sexual orientation as not inherent in determining who may serve in the military. It would set a standard of professional conduct for all personnel in the pursuit of good order and discipline. And it would be enforced in every level of the chain of command so as to maintain effective unit performance (Rostker et al.). Policy for Ending Discrimination

This policy binds all service members to the same standard of professional behavior (Rostker et al., 2000). It draws upon actual conduct, not behavior from presumed sexual orientation. It elicits tolerance and restraint for the good of the group without endorsing homosexual preference or lifestyle. The Standard of Professional Conduct has four features. The first requires all members of the military services to conduct themselves in ways, which accrue to good order and discipline. These include respect and tolerance towards others. While heterosexuals are asked to tolerate homosexual behavior, the military environment is not the appropriate setting for it. The second feature is that inappropriate conduct could undermine order and discipline, and hence service members should avoid such conduct. The third is a list of inappropriate conduct. This list includes personal harassment, abuse of authority, show of affection and explicit talks about sexual practices or experience. And the four is the observance of these standards by leaders of every level with the end-view of maintaining maximum performance (Rostker et al.).

Lifting the ban on homosexuals would require the modification of the enclosed Directive 1332.14 on administrative separations (Rostker et al., 2000). If sexual orientation were not a determinant on who may serve, neither would decisions on assignment, pay, military specialty or benefits be a determinant. And in issues, such as homosexual marriages or granting benefits to homosexual partners, there would be no need for the Department of Defense to change the current policy or be the lead federal agency to address the issues. How policy change is implemented instead determines how it will be accepted with minimal disruptions (Rostker et al.).

The RAND research team identified five key elements to an effective implementation strategy (Rostker et al., 2000). The first is the clear and consistent communication of the change in policy from the top. Senior military leaders frequently oppose change. Others will need to make their acceptance and commitment to it known to insure successful implementation. The troops must understand that behavioral dissent is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. The second is the immediate implementation of the change. Experimenting or uncertainty will invite continued resistance from its opponent. The third is the emphasis on conduct rather than tolerance or sensitivity. Behavior should be consistent with a change in policy and remain that way. The fourth is the leadership's constant messages of reassurance to the troops. This is needed in the presence of other stressful experiences. The troops must be made to feel that the change...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

And the fifth is empowerment of leaders at all levels to implement the new policy. Training may be called for to clear understanding and rapid implementation a monitoring process should also be put into place to detect problems early in the process and resolve immediately. The RAND team believed that this implementation strategy promised high probability of ending discrimination involving sexual orientation. It is practicable and realistic and insures that unit cohesion and performance can be preserved at the same time (Rostker et al.).
Summary and Conclusion

Homosexuality bias, especially in the military, has long existed. The U.S. Articles of War of 1916 expressly prohibited it until the initial but failed attempt by then Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton to lift the ban. A compromise was reached with the 1993 "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, which allowed homosexuals to get enlisted as long as they kept quiet about their gender preference. Times have changed and now 75% of Americans favor the enlisting of gays in the military. In his first State of the Union address, President Obama vowed to work on the lifting of the ban. He set Defense Secretary Gates and Admiral Mullen to the task of repealing the "Don't Ask" policy. Former President Clinton and his Defense Secretary Aspin in 1993 commissioned the RAND National Defense Research Institute to prepare a comprehensive study on the issue. The Institute came up with a policy that would end homosexual discrimination in the military in a practicable, realistic way and insure troop cohesion with minimal disruptions. Society now accepts gays in all its ranks as equals. A workable policy can replace the current one to respond to the new public sentiment. A nation built on the principle of equality needs to recognize the fact and adapt to it by introducing appropriate changes for a stronger, more cohesive military.#

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Burrelli, D.F. And Feder, J. (2009). Homosexuals and the U.S. military: current issues.

CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service: Federation of American

Scientists. Retrieved on March 5, 2010 from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL30113.pdf

Roberts, R and Roberts C. (2010). Society ready to accept gays in the military. Topeka Capital-Journal: ProQuest Information and Learning Company. Retrieved on March 5, 2010 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4179/is_20100222/ai_n50180056

Rostker B.D. et al. (2000). "Changing the Policy towards Homosexuals in the U.S.

Military." Sexual orientation and U.S. Military Personnel Policy. Rand National

Defense Research Institute: RAND Corporation. Retrieved on March 5, 2010

from http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB7537/index.html

Thompson, M. (2010). Congress resumes battle over gays in the military. Time: Time,

Inc. Retrieved on March 5, 2020 from http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,85951958253,00.htm

Webley, K. (2010). A brief history of gays in the military. Time: Time, Inc. Retrieved

on March 5, 2010 from http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1958246,00.html

Sources used in this document:
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Burrelli, D.F. And Feder, J. (2009). Homosexuals and the U.S. military: current issues.

CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service: Federation of American

Scientists. Retrieved on March 5, 2010 from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL30113.pdf

Roberts, R and Roberts C. (2010). Society ready to accept gays in the military. Topeka Capital-Journal: ProQuest Information and Learning Company. Retrieved on March 5, 2010 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4179/is_20100222/ai_n50180056
from http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB7537/index.html
Inc. Retrieved on March 5, 2020 from http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,85951958253,00.htm
on March 5, 2010 from http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1958246,00.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Gay/Lesbian Studies - Intimacy Intimacy
Words: 1618 Length: 6 Document Type: Thesis

To the extent either men or women all identified strongly with their prescribed gender roles, that could be an obvious problem anytime same-sex individuals entered into a relationship. Each partner would seek to fulfill his or her perceived role. In actuality, many homosexual couples do adhere to basic elements of traditional roles within relationships, wherein the partners fulfill reciprocal roles. However, in many cases, homosexual couples don not define their

Gay/Lesbian Studies - Discrimination in
Words: 1265 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

As of August 2001, 12 states, as well as the District of Columbia, had laws banning discrimination based on sexual orientation" (Horvath & Ryan 115). In the case, High Tech Gays v. Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office (1987), a district court held that lesbians and gay men constituted a quasi-suspect class because "homosexuals have historically been the object of pernicious and sustained hostility, and it is fair to say

Gay/Lesbian Studies - Marriage Issues
Words: 2476 Length: 9 Document Type: Thesis

61). In principle, adults tend to be drawn to potential romantic partners at least partly because part of the so-called chemistry between them reflects familiar aspects of their psychological pasts. Therefore, as pertains to marital communication issues, they are quite frequently direct consequences of the initial choice of partner more than anything else. When researchers examine the specific communication issues arising within unhappy marriages and other committed intimate relationships, one crucial

Gay/Lesbian Studies: Sexual Education the
Words: 1607 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

The traditional approach to sexual education in the United States has emphasized anatomy, physiology, and the mechanics of reproduction and birth control to the virtual exclusion of more meaningful aspects of human sexuality. A modern comprehensive sexual education program should begin before most students have already begun experimenting sexually rather than afterwards. Likewise, it should include appropriate focus on ethical values and moral concepts that relate directly to sexual patterns

Queer Literary Studies
Words: 914 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Queer Theory and Oscar Wilde Analysis of "Queer Theory" by Annamarie Jagose in relation to Dorian Gray's character in "The picture of Dorian Gray" by Oscar Wilde In her discussion of "Queer theory," author Annamarie Jagose provides a distinction between the concepts 'queer' and the dichotomous relationship between 'lesbian' and 'gay.' Jagose argued in her discussion of this theory that queer was a concept that had politically evolved through the years in

Gay Lesbian Civil Rights
Words: 1626 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

passing of the civil rights protection of homosexuals. This paper presents the views and reasons of the people who oppose the passing of this act. This paper then demonstrates the importance of the passing of this act and how it would benefit the society at large. The paper also highlights certain quotes to support its claim. Civil Rights Protection of Homosexuals Human beings claim to represent a society that is

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now