¶ … Future Trends for Civil Aviation
The importance of a viable civil aviation sector to national security has been well documented, but the aviation industry continues to struggle with skyrocketing fuel prices and highly regulated operational environment. In this setting, it is not surprising that some civil aircraft engine manufacturers have fallen by the wayside while others have prospered by achieving a competitive advantage of some sort. To identify what strategies have worked and those that have not, this portfolio explores the extent of internationalization in both global retailing and the manufacture of aircraft engines for civil aviation, followed by a review of successful and failed international strategies around the world for these industries including an evaluation of the importance of joint ventures on their respective outcomes. Finally, a summary of the research and important findings are presented in the portfolio's conclusion.
Review and Analysis
Internationalization of the Global Retailing and Civil Aircraft Engine Manufacturing Industry
The internationalization of global retailing became intensified as innovations in information and communications technology and transportation facilitated the globalization of the marketplace followed the end of World War II (Dawson 2003). One of the driving forces of global retailing has been the "globalisation of taste and the commodification of services" fueled by the proliferation of international franchise in the retail sector (Dawson 2003, p. 105).
During the period 1972 through 1991, for example, Kronemer and Henneberger (1998) report that productivity in the civil aircraft engine manufacturing sector increased 3.2%, but the overall growth rate for the industry itself began a sluggish decline during the early 1980s. This assessment is congruent with the observations made by Kister (1999) who suggests a number of factors contributed to the general decline of aircraft engine manufacturers during this period. For instance, Kister (1999) reports that at that time, "Airplane manufacturers may have overestimated their market when more than 14,000 single-engine aircraft were built in 1978. This oversaturation of the market, added to the generally poor economic conditions of the early 1980s, combined to decrease demand while supply was high" (p. 109).
Besides market oversaturation, other factors that contributed to the decline of aircraft engine manufacturers during the 1980s and 1990s that reflect the extent to which internationalization was affecting the industry included the following:
1. Increased tax burdens -- the imposition of a luxury tax and the elimination of investment tax credits;
2. Increased manufacture of homemade airplanes from kits that lessened the liability of the manufacturer;
3. The rise in the price of oil in the early 1980s;
4. The reduction of fares by the major passenger airlines after deregulation;
5. The concentration of the civil aviation industry on jet aircraft because of higher profit margins; and,
6. The aircraft built in the 1960s and 1970s were proving to be durable and made for good bargains as used planes (Kister 1999, p. 110).
In addition, the costs of flight training and the costs of the continuing education requirements needed to remain proficient contributed to further declines in civil aviation aircraft engines (Kister 1999). Besides the foregoing external factors, though, Kister (1999) suggests that there were some problems endemic to the civil aircraft engine manufacturing industry itself that were responsible for part of the decline, including decreasing productivity compared to foreign competitors and escalating labor costs, particularly in unionized facilities, with the failure of Piper Aircraft to respond to the changing times by becoming leaner and more agile as a primary example. For instance, Kister emphasizes that, "The manufacturers themselves also were part of the problem. When Piper Aircraft went into bankruptcy in the early 1990s, it was grossly overstaffed. In the late 1980s, it employed more than 1.5 indirect employees for every member of the production floor team. . . . During the period of overstaffing, Piper was losing about $30,000 on each Piper Cub sold" (p. 110). The costs that are associated with overstaffing are well documented, and are frequently compounded when the industry is heavily unionized (Tzannatos & Aidt 2006).
With respect to the underlying theory involved, Tzannoatos and Aidt (2006, p. 258) suggest that civil aircraft engine manufacturers that are unionized tend to experience a competitive disadvantage because of the following:
1. Unions prevent scarce resources from being allocated to the production of goods and services wanted and needed by consumers (for example, by affecting relative union / non-union wages between sectors and types of workers);
2. Unions prevent firms from producing the maximum output they could produce with...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now