Composition II
Frankenstein Application Essay
Option #4: Personal Perception
Mary Shelleys Frankenstein presents the story of a fictitious brilliant scientist, Victor, who is obsessed with the idea of life and death, and the relations between the mortal life and the supernatural. His desire leads him to create a monstrous creature from the organs of dead humans. At first, the creature is sensitive and gentle, but soon becomes a victim of societys alienation because of its appearance. It develops frustration and anger as a result, and seeks revenge against mankind by killing its creators wife, best friend, and little brother. Victor goes after the monster in order to avenge the deaths, but the monster fatally wounds him and accuses humans of lacking compassion as it disappears into the Arctic Sea (Frankenstein n.pag). Seemingly, the creature does not consider itself a monster, but people push him into being one when they alienate him. This assignment outlines a real-life case where an individual acts as a reaction to the abuse inflicted on them and uses sociological theory to determine who is accountable in such cases. Through the creatures character, Mary Shelley Frankenstein, exceptionally demonstrates that societys alienation fosters negative peer perceptions among victims and increases the risk of negative personal development.
The Case of Cho Seung-Hui
On April 16, 2007, twenty three-year old Cho, an Asian immigrant, entered the compound of the Virginia Tech Campus and shot indiscriminately at students, killing 32 people and injuring 25 others (Virginia Tech Review Panel Report N-4). He then shot and killed himself (Virginia Tech Review Panel Report N-4). In the wake of the incident, Chos teachers and classmates described him as a loner and a troubled student obsessed with violence (Virginia Tech Review Panel Report M-1). However, investigations into the incident indicated that Cho had a troubled past characterized by severe racial discrimination, bullying, and harassment, from middle school through high school (Virginia Tech Review Panel Report 37). Cho mailed a package to the NBC prior to the incident, indicating that throughout middle school, his...
…society. Thus, in the case of Cho and the creature, society is accountable for taking decisions and actions that foster discrimination and drive feelings of alienation among victims. Both Cho and the creature in Frankenstein acted negatively because they felt detached and alienated from family and peers. In Frankenstein, Victor animates the creature and was supposed to serve as its family but abandons it for its horrifying appearance. This denies the creature the love of family. The society discriminates against the creature for its scary appearance. At the same time, Cho has the support of his family, but the bullying and rejection by peers at school drives brews hatred that leads him to punish them. Chos peers discriminate against him because of his race. The murders in both cases could have been avoided if the victims enjoyed more love and felt like part of the society within which they lived.In conclusion, through the character of Victors creature, Shelley accurately demonstrates that feelings of alienation among victims foster negative personal…
Works Cited
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or the modern prometheus. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998.
Thornberry, Terence. “Towards an interactional theory of delinquency.” Criminology, vol. 25, no. 4, 1987, pp. 863-91.
Thornberry, Terence, et al. “Testing interactional theory: An examination of reciprocal causal relationships among family, school, and delinquency.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol. 82, no. 1, 1991, pp. 4-35.
Virginia Tech Review Panel Report. Mass Shootings at Virginia Tech. Virginia Tech Review Panel, 16 Apr. 2007. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/prevail/docs/VTReviewPanelReport.pdf. Accessed 22 October 2022.
Frankenstein and Enlightenment The Danger of Unregulated Thought in Frankenstein Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; Or, the Modern Prometheus, considered by many to be one of the first science-fiction novels written, is rife with anti-Enlightenment undertones. Shelley's novel, first published in 1818 and republished in 1831, examines the roles of science and religion, and provides a commentary on the dangers of playing God. Considering that Mary Shelley was the daughter of two prominent Enlightenment
Frankenstein An Analysis of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley wrote in her 1831 introduction to the reprint of Frankenstein that "supremely frightful would be the effect of any human endeavour to mock the stupendous mechanism of the Creator of the world" (x). These words not only indicate the manner of her thought on the night she conceived the idea for her gothic novel, they also reflect, as she notes, the ideas
Her list includes the following: culture / Nature reason / Nature male/female mind/body ( Nature) master/slave reason/matter (physicality) rationality/animality ( Nature) human / Nature (non-human) civilised/primitive ( Nature) production/reproduction ( Nature) self/other At first glance, this list seems to capture the basic groupings and gender associations that are at work in Mary Shelley's novel. The Creature exemplifies animality, primitiveness, and physicality, whereas Victor represents the forces of civilization, rational production, and culture. Victor is part of a happy family
Frankenstein & Romanticism How Romanticism is Demonstrated in Frankenstein In less than six years, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein will be 200 years old. This novel, indicative of the romantic period, is a compelling narrative with numerous themes and vivid imagery to consider. In the context of romanticism, Frankenstein is a worthwhile piece of literature to examine. Literature and art of the romantic period is characterized with an emphasis on intense emotional reactions, specifically
Frankenstein's creation of the monster is rendered as a kind of horrific pregnancy; for example, where a pregnant woman expands with the child she is bearing and usually eats more, Frankenstein wastes away during his work, depriving himself "of rest and health" (Shelley 43). Rather than expressing any kind of paternal (or maternal) love for his creation, Frankenstein recoils, as "breathless horror and disgust filled [his] heart" (Shelley 43).
Frankenstein Geneticists are the modern-day versions of Victor Frankenstein, maverick scientists who, in pursuing their personal dreams and ambitions cross over ethical lines. Mary Shelley was deeply concerned about the potential of science to blur humanitarian issues. In her classic novel Frankenstein, Shelley depicts a driven scientist who, for the love of knowledge and power, creates life. The ramifications of what is commonly called "playing God" include an inhumane mistreatment of
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now