Frankenstein & Romanticism
How Romanticism is Demonstrated in Frankenstein
In less than six years, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein will be 200 years old. This novel, indicative of the romantic period, is a compelling narrative with numerous themes and vivid imagery to consider. In the context of romanticism, Frankenstein is a worthwhile piece of literature to examine. Literature and art of the romantic period is characterized with an emphasis on intense emotional reactions, specifically emotions such as horror, terror, and awe. These emotions are central to the narrative of Frankenstein. Such emotions act as catalysts in the narrative and they serve to push the story on long after in has begun. This movement is also characterized by a return to the scientific and what is rational. Victor is, among other things, a devoted scientist.
Nicole Smith sees Mary Shelley as an author who retained a deep understanding of romanticism and also sees her as an author who pushed the envelope with her writing within the movement. Smith describes Victor as the "ultimate dreamer, who is preoccupied by otherworldly concerns and unattainable ideals. In this sense, he is highly romantic." (Smith, "Elements of Romanticism in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley") Victor is but a single example of romanticism at work in the novel. Smith considers that nature is an important symbol of the romantic in Frankenstein. Several landscapes are described throughout the novel including that of the Orkneys and of Switzerland. The ways in which these landscapes are described is romantic, besides nature having an inherent romantic quality about it already. Smith furthers points out the romantic in Victor's quest to design and create the perfect human. Victor is pursuing a romantic ideal in his creation of Frankenstein; he purses the romantic, scientific ideal that there is such a thing as a perfect human being and that he can make that person. Smith contends that what makes Shelley's piece an exemplar of romanticism is how nearly every character has and expresses deeply romantic desires that are both possible and impossible in conjunction with the characters concern for and engagement with the fantastical rather than the real. The characters fight against the roles they perceive society has outlined for them. Their romantic struggle is against preconception, the struggle for emotional truth, and to push themselves through what they are to what they wish to be.
Paul H. Fry writes to clearly define and explain the parameters of romanticism as he claims that too often the term is used without clear definition or regard for the true meaning. One of his key points directly responds to the character Frankenstein. He writes that a trait of romantic writers was to incorporate the use of prelinguistic sounds that comes off to the modern ear as rude, is a poetic metaphor. The lack of language, for Fry symbolizes the romantic urge to express what cannot be expressed and/or that what is romantic may be misunderstood or not understood at all by those not struck by the movement. Frankenstein, the creature, notably, has no language. He, like an infant, is unable to articulate his emotions or desires with words and faces challenges when attempting to connect with other creatures including animals and people.
Detailed Notes on the Sources
From Romanticism and Colonialism
"…Romanticism's relationship with colonialism has been relatively little studied, although a wealth of critical writing has been devoted to the connection between both early modern and nineteenth-century literature and the histories of colonialism and imperialism." (Page 1 -- 2)
"The other is always the 'uncanny Other' and othering is a process of alienation and of epistemic violence (often a prelude to material force) whereby an exclusionary distinction is made between the white westerner and the colonized subject [who in this case is Frankenstein]. The essays demonstrate how the many and various peoples subject to Western colonial and imperial processes [symbolized by the townspeople who force Frankenstein away] in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, underwent a process of estrangement, frequently being homogenized and often demonized [Victor and Frankenstein]. Imaginary borderlines were constructed on the bases on imputed savagery, cannibalism, and so on." (Page 6 -- 7)
These quotes help contextualize the themes and symbols from the novel into the greater movement of Romanticism as well as connect Romanticism as a reflection of world events in art.
From British Romanticism and the Science of the Mind
"Things are not much different now, although a half-century of psychoanalytically inspired literary analysis has piqued scholarly interest in Mesmerism and other Romantic-era anticipations of depth psychology. Most work on the Romantic mind continues to be informed by a disembodied version of associationism, by psychoanalysis, or by epistemological issues that link Romantic literary figures to a philosophical tradition running from German idealism to phenomenology and its
Her list includes the following: culture / Nature reason / Nature male/female mind/body ( Nature) master/slave reason/matter (physicality) rationality/animality ( Nature) human / Nature (non-human) civilised/primitive ( Nature) production/reproduction ( Nature) self/other At first glance, this list seems to capture the basic groupings and gender associations that are at work in Mary Shelley's novel. The Creature exemplifies animality, primitiveness, and physicality, whereas Victor represents the forces of civilization, rational production, and culture. Victor is part of a happy family
Frankenstein An Analysis of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley wrote in her 1831 introduction to the reprint of Frankenstein that "supremely frightful would be the effect of any human endeavour to mock the stupendous mechanism of the Creator of the world" (x). These words not only indicate the manner of her thought on the night she conceived the idea for her gothic novel, they also reflect, as she notes, the ideas
Thus Shelley's novel provides a third solution of sorts, an acknowledgement of the imperfect and estranged nature of humanity that is not comforting, but seems more realistic to modern readers, perhaps, as the monster seems like a modern anti-hero, from a 21st century point-of-view. Even to 19th century readers, Shelley's ambiguous views of science and religion were likely to resonate. The analogies of creator and created are deliberately ambiguous in
However, he also chooses isolation in his desire to explore the North Pole. And yet, to Brannstrom, the character of Robert Walton balances Victor Frankenstein who deliberately chooses to isolate himself from society and the creature who longs to belong to society. According to Brannstrom, "Walton is someone who can strive for distinction but at the same time turn back when his actions might harm others." Tied to the theme
Finally, it is worth briefly mentioning that even if there were some inherent quality to human beings that existed prior to experience and influenced their personality and behavior, then the monster's experiences would seem to suggest that this human nature is inherently violent, cruel, and petty, rather than representing the kind of pure ideal suggested by Victor. In Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein, the idea of nature vs. nurture is explored
It has "… taken on a life of its own independent of Mary Shelley's text, and indeed even independent of certain parts of her narrative." (Goodall 19) This has resulted in film and stage play versions of the novel. The reason for this continuing popularity lies largely with the relevance of the themes; particularly with regard to the theme of man 'playing God' through his application of scientific knowledge and
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now