Overlapping Model of IGR Presentation Preparation
1 Introduction
This presentation describes and discusses Deil Wrights seminal work on IGR. It identifies the model, describes three types of IGR, explains how they relate, and what is meant by cooperation, conflict, competition and fragmentation.
2 Deil Wrights Seminal Work
Deil Wright's seminal work on intergovernmental relations (IGR) proposed a model that has been widely influential in both academic and policy circles. In his view, IGR can be understood as the ways in which different levels of government interact with one another.
This interaction can take many forms, including cooperation, conflict, competition, and fragmentation (Hamilton & Stenberg, 2018).
3 Three Types of IGR
Wright's model identifies three main types of IGR: horizontal, vertical, and diagonal. Horizontal IGR occurs between units at the same level of government, such as between two provinces. Vertical IGR takes place between units at different levels of government, such as between the federal government and a province or state. Diagonal IGR involves interactions between units that are not at the same level of government, such as between a municipality government of one state and the government of another state.
4 How They Interact and Overlap
These three types of IGR are not mutually exclusive; in fact, they often overlap and interact with one another. In reality, these types of IGR are often intertwined. For example, horizontal IGR may involve negotiations between different provinces in Canada, while vertical IGR may come into play...
8 Coordination
Coordinated IGR exists when there is some degree of coordination between different levels of government, but not necessarily a full consensus.
9 Fragmentation
Fragmented IGR occurs when there is little or no communication or coordination between different levels of government.
10 Conclusion
Wright's model has proven to be a valuable tool for understanding the complex ways in which different levels of government interact with one another. Interestingly, Deil Wright's intergovernmental relations (IGR) model can be used to help us understand both the potential for conflict and the potential for cooperation between different levels of government. But as we can see, then, the IGR model provides a helpful way of understanding the potential for both conflict…
References
Burke, B. F., & Brudney, J. L. (2018). Why We Fight: Conflict and “Coping” in Twenty-First-Century Intergovernmental Relations. In Intergovernmental relations in transition (pp. 58-74). Routledge.
Hamilton, D. K., & Stenberg, C. W. (2018). Introduction: Intergovernmental Relations inTransition. In Intergovernmental Relations in Transition (pp. 1-12). Routledge.
Kincaid, J. (2018). Why coercion and cooperation coexist in American federalism.
In Intergovernmental relations in transition (pp. 37-57). Routledge.
Stenberg, C. W., & Hamilton, D. K. (2018). Back to the Future?: The Road Ahead.
In Intergovernmental Relations in Transition (pp. 276-284). Routledge.
governance namely federalism, centralized and unitary but mainly focusing on federalism as practiced in America. We will be looking at what federalism in the context of its inclusion on the America's constitution and the effects it had on the country. Lastly the paper will discuss the other two forms of governments and why they are different from federal model. For this first question, the paper will attempt to look at
Public Administration in Brazil PUBLIC ADMINSTRATION IN BRAZIL The grassroots and rural development happen to be the main concern and responsibility of any responsive government in a political system. This because the power of political participation is significant in any developmental process of a country which has persistently eluded many people at the grassroots level. Brazil as a developing country needs to take into consideration the significant of efficient administrative responsibilities in
Partisan Politics At the time the U.S. Constitution was ratified, the new America of the 19th century saw its indigenes with varied political opinions. Those in favor of a powerful central government and therefore, a restraint of the powers the states possessed were part of the Federalist Party; those with the belief that interpretation should be given to the Constitution in order to reduce the powers the national government wields, which
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now