In looking at internal psychological states things like goals and self-efficacy beliefs are main determinants of behavior (Vancouver, More, & Yoder, 2008)
External factors influencing Jenny's personality, were her interactions socially within the environment in which she lived. Also contributing to her self-schema and how she viewed the environment was the development of knowledge structures. The different social and interpersonal experiences Jenny faced developed a self-schema that was different from those around her. Since Forrest was the only person she had that was positive in her life, her experiences drove her toward a negative self-schema. This would be the only way she might be able to understand the abuse she received throughout her lifetime.
Another external factor Jenny had to deal with was the stigma of being an abused child. She did her best to hide what was happening to her but it did not help her self-esteem. Pachankis (2007) proposes individuals with a concealable stigma may have a lower self-esteem, will not seek out groups who have a similar stigma, and may prevent them from disclosing and attaining support from others.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Jenny started in a negative environment that fostered her low self-esteem. By continuing to stay in these negative environments, she was reinforcing the negative self-schema she led herself to believe. Jenny had an ideal self that included being a good person and this is what she strived for in her life. Erikson (2007) suggests self-schemas are important to our formulation of possible selves and what we expect about the future is dependent on how we see ourselves.
As Jenny could no further she was able to take a step back and look at her life in a new way. She learned to deal with her emotions and behavior and put it behind her. Forrest played a large part in helping Jenny see the negative self-schema she had formed, by showing her how good he thought she was and providing a positive experience in her life, Jenny was able to stop the negative cycle.
In all Jenny still could have used some kind...
Within those sessions giving her a chance to utilize the guiding fictions of the Adlerian approach, she would have been shown how to change her negative self-talk and develop a higher self-schema.
Reference List
Anderson, S.M., Saribay, a., & Thorpe, J.S. (2008). Simple kindness can go a long way:
Relationships, social identity, and engagement. Social Psychology. 39[1], 59-69.
Diehl, a.S., & Prout, M.F. (2002). Effects of posttraumatic stress disorder and child sexual abuse on self-efficacy development. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.
72[2], 262-265.
Erikson, M.G. (2007). The meaning of the future: Toward a more specific definition of possible selves. Review of General Psychology. 11[4], 348-358.
Krause, N. (2007). Longitudinal study of social support and meaning in life. Psychology and Aging. 22[3], 456-469.
Mustanski, B., Viken, R.J., Kaprio, J., Winter, T., & Rose, R. (2007). Sexual behavior in young adulthood: A population-based twin study. Health Psychology. 26[5], 610-617.
Pachankis, J.E. (2007).The Psychological Implications of Concealing a Stigma: A Cognitive-
Affective-Behavioral Model. Psychological Bulletin. 133[2], 328-345.
Pervin, L., Cervone, D., & Oliver, J. (2005). HS814: Theories of Personality (Custom). New
York: Wiley.
Swann Jr., W.B., Chang-Schneider, C., & Larsen-McClarty, K. (2007). Do People's Self-
Views Matter? Self-Concept and Self-Esteem in Everyday Life. American Psychologist. 82[2], 84-94.
Tamir, M., John, O.P., Srivastava, S., & Gross, J.J. (2007).Implicit theories of emotion: Affective and social outcomes across a major life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 92[4], 731-744.
Vancouver, J.B., More, K.M., & Yoder, R.J. (2008). Self-efficacy and resource allocation:
Support for a nonmonotonic, discontinuous model. Journal of Applied Psychology. 93[1], 35-47.
