Understanding Assessments
Assessments are essential in education because they serve as measures of student understanding (National Research Council, 2001). They can be also be used by teachers to make instructional decisions, and evaluate the effectiveness of educational programs (Stiggins & Duke, 2008). My personal and professional experiences with assessments range from high-stakes standardized tests to formative classroom quizzes, have shaped my understanding of their multifaceted nature.
The main purpose of assessment is to evaluate students' mastery of content and skills, and if done well the assessment can give valuable data that informs teaching and learning (National Research Council, 2001). Formative assessments can be anything from quizzes to discussions, but they are conducted during the learning process and help teachers see students' strengths and areas for improvement. They give immediate feedback so that teachers can make adjustments to their instruction if needed. Summative assessments, on the other hand, take place at the end of an instructional period and evaluate the overall understanding and proficiency of students. High-stakes assessments, like standardized tests, can serve accountability purposes, and are often used by schools to make sure they are meeting educational standards.
However, sometimes assessments can also hinder learning and student growth if they are not designed or implemented appropriately (Suskie, 2018). For example, high-stakes testing can create a high-pressure environment causing great anxiety for students and teachers (who may feel pressured to teach to the test), and this could detract from the learning experience. Plus, if assessments are not aligned with instructional content or are not culturally responsive, they might not accurately reflect students' abilities (Suskie, 2018).
Research and literature in education reveals the importance of using a balanced assessment approach, integrating both formative and summative assessments to support and evaluate learning. (National Research Council, 2001). Effective assessments should be valid, reliable, and fair, providing a comprehensive picture of students' learning and guiding educators in their instructional decisions. Teachers should thoughtfully integrating assessments into the learning process, so that they can maximize student potential to learn and contribute positively to their academic success.
References
National Research Council. (2001).Knowing what students know: The science and design of
educational assessment. National Academies Press.
Stiggins, R., & Duke, D. (2008). Effective instructional leadership requires assessment
leadership.Phi Delta Kappan,90(4), 285-291.
Suskie, L. (2018).Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Recognition of quality and lack there of should be a basic goal of the education system, as it strives to direct resources and change situations that are not meeting the demands of accountability, yet it is clear that High Stakes testing does a poor job identifying good schools and good teachers as it ignored, by default important information that is not available on the test scores. It has been clear
7). Although "one would expect higher quality assessment instruments that produce better information to make education decisions given NCLB-imposed penalties for districts associated with poor performance on the test...many states struggle with budget deficits and funding restrictions. They cannot allocate the funds necessary to improve the testing programs. States are forced to rely on large-scale assessments with too few questions and a narrow focus on skills and knowledge that are
Thus, students faced with fear and stress, are overwhelmed, concentrating on the test rather than on the goals of learning. They cannot concentrate on school work, understanding the importance of learning and education, because of stress that forces some to focus only on the test and others to drop out. III. High stakes testing disadvantages those with learning disabilities. In addition to lowering the teaching capacity of some teachers and students'
"Schools will not be able to attract high-quality teachers to a system that stifles richness and creativity and emphasizes a narrow band of knowledge and a very restricted set of tests to measure it." Consequently, struggling schools will get worse as teachers move to more affluent public or private schools to teach. The students will suffer the consequences of inadequate instruction the most. In the end, High Stakes Testing does
Because of this, students who had disabilities, low language proficiency, and who come from various ethnic backgrounds are viewed as such during the grading process. In addition, these kinds of assessments allow professors to not only assess whether the students have learned the subject matter, but also whether or not they have the skills to proceed in the academic realm. According to the Ohio Department of Education (n.d.), there
articles on high-stakes testing. Specifically, it will review the three articles, and include how the articles changed my personal views on high-stakes testing. Clearly, testing is a necessity in the educational environment, and yet, many forms of testing seem to be more a form of control and labeling rather than a way to accurately measure the student's expected and actual learning outcomes. High-stakes testing may help reinforce the school
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now