Russia's National Security Strategy
According to Isabelle Falcon, in Russia's view, it was necessary to update its national security strategy following the events that unfolded in Ukraine and the crisis that followed in Moscow. Russia adopted a new military doctrine on 25th Dec 2014, was signed by the president a year later and Russia adopted the new foreign policy concept on 30 of November 2016[footnoteRef:1]. [1: Isabelle Facon, "Russia's national security strategy and military doctrine and their implications for the EU," European Parliament, 2017, doi: 10.2861/635490.]
The updated documents highlight several key issues that reflect the traditional view that Russia holds about the world and its vision. They underscore the country's status as world powerhouse; and that its sovereignty must be respected. They also point out that Russia's foreign policy must be independent of the outside world. The general message that the documents send is that the outside world is full of chaos, dangerous, volatile and marked by stiff competition for resources including competition for Russia's resources control, trade routes and political power over its associates and major world powers. The documents emphasize Russia's need to maintain its political influence in the post-soviet times. The implication here is that Russia must control the political and military set up around its borders, including that of its neighboring countries[footnoteRef:2]. [2: Ibid., 6.]
Keir Giles, points out newer elements observed in the documents updated. The prospect of making Russia stronger comes at a price. There is formidable opposition from other world powers. These powers reject the stance taken by Russia's new foreign policy documents. Part of the security strategy, interestingly, is to educate children in school to become responsible Russian citizens based on traditional, cultural and social values of the state of Russia. Traditional Western powers have lost their grip on the economic front and are now making persistent attempts to reposition themselves and maintain status quo in the new world. Such moves cause instability in international relations, turmoil regionally and on the global front[footnoteRef:3]. [3: Keir Giles, "Russia's National Security Strategy to 2020," ETH Zurich, June 2009, https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/154909/RusNatSecStrategyto2020.pdf..]
Russia has actively conducted operation in what were the former states of the Soviet Union in order to deter NATO and EU from influencing these countries. The analyses of the conflicts by westerners have highlighted the various forces that Russia and the Russia Federation Armed Forces has used to achieve its ends in these states. It has been reported to exploit cyber forces in such countries as Estonia, conventional military forces in Georgia and its Special Operations Forces in the Crimea region of Ukraine. They also sought to establish how SOF, Airborne and naval divisions worked as rapid response units.
FRAF has shifted its offensive approaches and adopted an operational style so as to achieve its intentions in countries nearby. It has established regions in which it has spread its influence within the countries that were part of the former Soviet Union. They seek to protect Russian interest and that of Russian minorities abroad. Russia, in 2003, drafted and released a white paper that supported the policy. It indicated a shift in the way the military thought and defined a new concept for its operations on the military front. This new concept was powered by the need to integrate operational, strategic and tactical elements of the force. An important aspect of the strategy was the swift disruption, destruction, and control of economics, communications, political and infrastructural elements. These moves are meant to disable the enemy…
Not surprisingly, permanent membership on the UN Security Council is a coveted international plum, and those countries that enjoy membership are empowered to virtually veto any substantive action on the part of the Security Council single-handedly (Carlson 9). In the alternative, if the Russian foreign policymakers accepted Germany's bid for membership, it might swing the balance of power from the existing China-Russia (and sometimes France) cabal that exists today
Foreign Policy Nixon's Detente Description Detente was a cooling down, or thaw, among America, Russia and China's arms' race (Detente). The United States and Russia could either slow their weapons production or continue the arms race, which, people feared could end in a devastating war (Detente, CNN). Nixon and Henry Kissinger worked secretly on Detente at summit meetings in Beijing and Moscow. President Gerald Ford signed on to Detente in Helsinki in 1975.
The U.S. And Russia reportedly have about 90% of all the nuclear weapons in the world. So if this treaty makes sense for both sides, and shows a newfound sense of cooperation between the two nations that were Cold War enemies, why would there be dissention in the U.S. Senate? That question can be answered a couple different ways. For one, there is a very divided and hostile political situation
Foreign Policy of President Reagan Before the disastrous Vietnam War, the U.S. held an undisputed dominant position worldwide, recognized locally as well as by other nations. The nation's historic actions towards defending freedom, by restraining the fascist faction during the Second World War, followed by organizing a large free-state coalition for combating communism, were supported by profound and sweeping domestic consensus. This consensus was destroyed by America's decision to wage war
Ronald Reagan Foreign Policy: Annotated Bibliography Tucker, Robert W. 1989. "REAGAN'S FOREIGN POLICY." Foreign Affairs 68, no. 1: 1-27. The author of this article maintains that Ronald Reagan assumed the Presidential role rebuking the 70s' arms control attempts. As a majority of Reagan's fellow politicians were highly suspicious of any arms control pacts with Russia, the general belief was that the newly sworn-in President shared the same view. The cold-war agreement with
Foreign Policy of China (Beijing consensus) Structure of Chinese Foreign Policy The "Chinese Model" of Investment The "Beijing Consensus" as a Competing Framework Operational Views The U.S.-China (Beijing consensus) Trade Agreement and Beijing Consensus Trading with the Enemy Act Export Control Act. Mutual Defense Assistance Control Act Category B Category C The 1974 Trade Act. The Operational Consequences of Chinese Foreign Policy The World Views and China (Beijing consensus) Expatriates The Managerial Practices Self Sufficiency of China (Beijing consensus) China and western world: A comparison The China (Beijing
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now