Ford Motor Company was the only one of America's Big Three automakers to turn down government assistance in 2009. The company wanted to maintain its independence, and believed that the strategies that were in place were going to be sufficient to bring about the financial recovery of the firm. In the past couple of years, the company has revamped its product line, cut its expenses, and sought to take advantage of the growth in overseas markets.
What this presentation will show is that for the most part, Ford has experienced something of a renaissance in the past couple of years as the result of these strategies. The analysis will consist of a ratio analysis, an examination of the current economic climate and how that affects Ford's strategy, and a qualitative analysis of both Ford and the auto industry in general. But there is a bigger question that must be answered. Before the changes of the past couple of years, Ford was a mess and its stock was almost worthless. The market has rewarded the company for its recent efforts, however. Given that, is Ford actually a good value? If you are an investor today, do you want to buy Ford? Or is the new, revamped, Ford still a company that faces a lot of challenges that continue to make it unattractive to investors?
Slide 2: The first step to analyzing Ford's financial performance is to conduct a ratio analysis. This includes an analysis of Ford's liquidity. When the company rejected the government bailout, a lot of observers panned the move, noting the company's burn rate and predicting that Ford would need government money sooner or later, so they should probably take it sooner. But this isn't what happened at Ford.
The company's current ratio today is 2.6, compared with 1.7 in2007. The quick ratio is 2.44 today, compared with 1.59 in 2007. The cash ratio today is 0.39, compared with 0.37 in 2007. The current ratio probably looks better than it really is in all three of these years because much of Ford Credit's assets are counted as current while its liabilities are recorded as long-term, but the improvement in the company's liquidity is evident.
Slide 3: The company has also undertaken steps to improve its margins. Big Auto is a high-volume, low-margin business so any margin improvements that the company can make will have a significant impact on the bottom line.
The gross margin in 2010 was 15.6%, up from 6.8% in 2008 and 2.1% in 2006. This reflects superior pricing power over both buyers and suppliers. The operating margin was 4.4%, compared with operating losses in 2008 and 2006. To achieve this improvement, the company cut its selling, general and administrative expense from 16% of revenues in 2008 to just 9.1% of revenues in 2010. In 2010, the company recorded a net margin of 5.1% after taking huge losses in 2008 and 2006. These margin improvements reflect a comprehensive effort on the part of Ford to address areas of weakness across the organization.
Slide 4: The next category of ratios is the operating performance ratios. Ford has recorded strong performance here as well. The company's receivables turnover is 17.7 times, its inventory turnover is 19.9 times and its asset turnover is 0.7 times. The first two figures are well above the industry average. The latter is a low number mostly because of the high fixed costs associated with the automaking business.
Ford's investment return ratios have also demonstrated improvement. The company earned an ROA of 3.7%. This beats the industry average. Return on invested capital is 5.6%. This beats the industry average. Unfortunately, Ford's equity value remains negative, so there was no ROE to record last year. What is interesting is that while Ford is beating the industry average in 2010, it lags the industry in its five-year averages. This reflects the degree to which Ford has improved -- from laggard to leader in just a few years.
Slide 5: Ford's recovery is strong, and has a lot to do with its own internal performance, but the company is still subject to prevailing economic conditions. Ford struggled in 2008 and 2009 when the economy went into a tailspin. Consumers either delayed purchases, bought used cars or bought smaller cars. While Ford has recorded goods results from its Chinese subsidiaries, the company is still dependent on economic conditions in the West -- North America and Europe account for 72% of volume sales.
The economic prognosis is lukewarm. The Congressional Budget Office is...
Ford Motor Company Business Analysis Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company is 4th on Fortune 500 List and 4th on Global 500 List and is the 2nd largest auto manufacturer in the world. Ford Motor Company has the advantage of Ford Motor Credit however, due to Firestone tire recalls the prices are the lowest prices in years with cash reserves sunk to $4.1 billion and $13 billion on acquisitions with $3.5 billion
Based on the data presented in the Table 2, it is revealed that Ford is a company that is good for the investment opportunity. The profitability ratios are one of the key ratios to determine the financial health of a company. Based on the data in Table 2, Ford Company demonstrates the increase in the profitability ratios between 2008 and 2011. For example, the ROA increase from the loss of
Ford Motors Company Ford Motor Company is an American Multinational company that was founded by Henry Ford in the year 1903. Ford's headquarter is in Dearborn Michigan in the United States where it specializes in the production of automobiles both commercial and luxury. Under its commercial category of vehicles, it trades under the Ford brand while its luxury cars trade under the Lincoln brand. Ford Motors is a well established company
Ford faces many threats. In terms of operational/strategic threats, the company faces intense competition in all of its markets. There is no product or geography where Ford does not face intense competition. This drives down margins and exposes Ford to the possibility of declining sales. The competitors in the industry are innovating at a rate faster than Ford generally is. This creates new and unique competitive threats. Ford is under
Ford Motor Company: The future of HR What are the key business strategies? Of all of the troubled 'big three' automakers, Ford was the only one not to need major financial help and government-supervised restructuring. This was seen partially as a result of Ford's commitment to incorporate sustainability into its car designs far earlier than either General Motors or Chrysler. "Ford's current strength stems from what was a literal bet-the-company decision in
Ford Motor Company -- Flowchart Analysis Ford Motor Company is one of the largest manufacturing companies in the global marketplace. Fiscally, Ford has had two major recent periods; one of prosperity, one of decline. Period #1, the late 1980s to 19979, showed a steady pattern of growth, about 5-7% per annum. Sales in 1998 were down 6%, up 14% in 1999, giving the decade an average of 5.4% growth and a
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now