Verified Document

Fiat, Tata, International Partnerships Essay

Fiat and Tata There are several different criteria by which a company can choose an anchor partner. An anchor partner is defined as one that "holds back the development of a successful strategic alliance because it cannot or will not provide its share of the funding" (p.357). If a partnership is struggling, typically a company will want to look at what it is doing, and what the partner is doing, to determine what factors are causing the partnership to fail. The first criterion for identifying an anchor partner is one that is not able to contribute the desired legal, local market or other expertise. Fiat's partnership with Tata sought to improve the Fiat dealer network and access to parts in India, whereas Tata perhaps would have been able to gain some access to Fiat's European distribution in the long run. If the partners, however, are for whatever reason unable to deliver the local market benefits that were part of the underlying logic for the partnership in the first place, then that becomes an anchor partner.

The second criterion for an anchor partner stability. The partner needs to have stability in things like finances and leadership in order to be able to deliver...

A company should, therefore, have a set of stability criteria that it uses to evaluate partners and potential partners. A company should look at partners as if they were an equity investor or a creditor, because ultimately there is a financial dimension to the partnership. For Fiat, Tata is a fairly stable partner, though arguably Fiat has much lower stability as a partner for Tata. Tata cannot even rely on the fact that GM took a stake in Fiat, because GM was not stable at the time, either. Thus, a partner whose stability is not certain has the potential to become an anchor partner.
The third criterion for determining an anchor partner is poor results. Plain and simple, partnerships are about results. While stability and synergy, the first two criteria, are about measuring inputs, the third criterion is about the outputs of the partnership. Even if the partner is stable, and fulfilling its obligations under the memorandum of understanding, this does not mean that the partnership is going to be successful. When a company puts effort and capital into a partnership, it needs to get returns, and those returns should be superior to other…

Sources used in this document:
References

Multinational Management, 6th Edition Cengage.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Fiat Case Study Fiat, Once
Words: 2120 Length: 7 Document Type: Thesis

In the case of Toyota they have focused on supply chain integration, collaboration and collaborative forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) workflows. What emerges from this SWOT analysis from a competitive analysis standpoint is that while Fiat was concentrating on product-driven strategies for differentiation, its competitors had embraced and were well on their way to making processes their core competitive advantage, especially those augmenting personal productivity (Porter, 2008). Fiat's opportunities however are

School of Engineering and Design
Words: 15360 Length: 56 Document Type: Dissertation

The last century has seen an increase in the level of international purchases which has been supported by the developments in transportation and technology. Goods can move faster than before with developments in logistics. The negotiation and forming contracts for purchase with companies and communicate with potential suppliers in distant countries is also easier than in the past with the internet and tools such as video conferencing and emails.

Influence of 2007 Economic Crisis on American Car Market
Words: 24230 Length: 88 Document Type: Thesis

2007 Economic Crisis on American Car market Effect of the 2008 global economic crisis on automotive industries Crisis in the United States Crisis in Canada Crisis in Russia Crisis in European markets Crisis in Asian markets Effects by other related crisis events In this paper, we will review the effects of 2008 global automotive crisis. Our main focus will be on the American car manufacturers and the negative impact they suffered due to the crisis. We will

Chrysler Group LLC SWOT Analysis
Words: 1321 Length: 4 Document Type: Research Proposal

The EVMI initiative will push the supply chain even more rigorously, requiring even greater financial investment. EVMI as a technology is an opportunity; the challenge for Chrysler is to transform their supply chain into a support infrastructure that can fully make this opportunity realizable. Additional opportunities for the company include the continual improvement of their quality management and compliance systems so they will be able to exceed CAFE requirement

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now