Feminism Both Bell Hooks and Cherrie Moraga point out weaknesses and omissions in feminist theory in their respective articles, "Black Women Shaping Feminist Theory," and "La Guerra." Each feels that mainstream feminist discourse neglects to address certain groups of women, especially women of color and for Moraga, lesbians as well. Hooks' premise is that "White women who dominate feminist discourse ... have little or no understanding of white supremacy as a racial politic, of the psychological impact of class, of their political status within a racist, sexist, capitalist state." Similarly, Moraga states, "Within the women's movement, the connections among women of different backgrounds and sexual orientations have been fragile at best," (30). In their critiques, Hooks and Moraga both use the language of the oppressed, linking feminism with the empowerment of all disenfranchised groups. The authors' vision of feminism as an inclusive doctrine that applies to women of all backgrounds, classes, and...

Hooks notes, for example, "When I participated in feminist groups, I found that white women adopted a condescending attitude towards me and other non-white participants." She provides numerous other examples and anecdotes attesting to the neglect of women of color from feminist discourse. Likewise, Moraga too speaks from personal experience. "When I finally lifted the lid to my lesbianism, a profound connection with my mother reawakened in me," (28). Just as Moraga links her reconnection with her Chicano roots to her sexual orientation, so too does Hooks link race and class. Both women, though they refer to different types of oppression and speak from different experiences as members of oppressed groups of people, find such connections…