Verified Document

Federalists & Anti-Federalists Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists The Essay

Federalists & Anti-Federalists Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists

The contextual framework of the historic debate between federalists and anti-federalists involved major institutional expansion and reform as well as the political sphere. Although both groups of leaders embraced popular accountability as the standard of government legitimacy, their respective approaches differed quite significantly; reflecting different perspectives on the perils of citizen participation, concentrated power, and the need for effective and energetic government (Borowiak, 2007).

The leaders of the anti-federalists' movement, Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams and Thomas Jefferson purported that the constitution of the United Stated should not be ratified. The basis of their argument was contingent upon, in their opinion, ratification gave too much power to the national government; pre-empting state authority; there was no bill of rights; the executive branch would be too powerful; congress, due to the "necessary and proper clause" provided too much power, and the national government could maintain an army even in times of peace...

A principal component of the anti-federalists argument was against the government merging into one nation as it would serve to summarily undermine state authority, and in their minds, individual freedoms and the "end of any legitimate government" (113).
Conversely, the federalists countered all of the complaints registered by the anti-federalists. The leaders of the federalists' movement, namely Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison argued that by separating the powers into three distinctive and independent branches, the rights of the people were protected, and because all three branches were equal, no one sect could assume control over another; having a list of rights could be prohibitive as any right that was not expressly listed could be constitutionally violated and protected by the laws of the land. By not listing a limited number of specific rights, then all the inherent rights of all citizens stood a better chance of being protected (Madison & Hamilton, 1787).

For the anti-federalists, the lack of a bill of rights was the most effective argument, as evidenced by the…

Sources used in this document:
References:

Borowiak, C. (2007). Accountability debates: The federalists, the anti-federalists, and Democratic deficits, Journal of Politics, 69(4), 998-1014.

Hamilton, A., & Madison, J. (1787). The federalist papers. New American Library: Penguin Group.

Storing, H. (1981). What the anti-federalist were for. The University of Chicago
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Federalist and Anti-Federalist Review Federalist Papers Were
Words: 1217 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Federalist and Anti-Federalist Review Federalist papers were written in support of the ratification of the U.S. constitution while anti-federalists were written in opposition of the same. The most important papers in federalist series were paper 10 and 5 both written by James Madison on the subject of power distribution within the federation. Anti-federalist paper 3 was written under the pseudonym Brutus and meant to oppose the arguments raised by Madison on

Federalist What Is a Faction Where in
Words: 2847 Length: 7 Document Type: Research Paper

Federalist What is a faction? Where in modern American politics do we see factions? How does Madison propose to quell the impact of factions in government? In Federalist 10, James Madison discussed the types of factions, parties and interest groups that result from differences in wealth and property, as well as differences of opinion in religion, politics or ideology. He thought that differences in wealth and rank, at least those not

Lesson Plan Amp; Reflection I Didn't Know
Words: 857 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Lesson Plan Amp; Reflection I didn't know what state you are in so was unable to do state/district standards! Lesson Plan Age/Grade Range; Developmental Level(s): 7-8/2nd Grade; Below grade level Anticipated Lesson Duration: 45 Minutes Lesson Foundations Pre-assessment (including cognitive and noncognitive measures): All students are reading below grade level (5-7 months) as measured by standardized assessments and teacher observation Curricular Focus, Theme, or Subject Area: Reading: Fluency, word recognition, and comprehension State/District Standards: Learning Objectives: Students will develop

Branding New Service Dominant Logic
Words: 12522 Length: 50 Document Type: Dissertation

Branding in Service Markets Amp Aim And Objectives Themes for AMP Characteristics Composing Branding Concept Branding Evolution S-D Logic and Service Markets Branding Challenges in Service Markets Considerations for Effective Service Branding Categories and Themes Branding Theory Evolution S-D Logic and Service Markets Branding Challenges in Service Markets Considerations for Effective Service Branding Branding Concept Characteristics Characteristics Composing Branding Concept Sampling of Studies Reviewed Evolution of Branding Theory Evolution of Marketing Service-Brand-Relationship-Value Triangle Brand Identity, Position & Image Just as marketing increasingly influences most aspects of the consumer's lives, brands

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now