Verified Document

Fallacies In Frederick Douglass' The Essay

Related Topics:

Douglass asks, "Must I undertake to prove that the slave is a man? That point is conceded already. Nobody doubts it" (Douglass, 1852). However, this statement was simply not true; the humanity of blacks was a seriously debated point at that period of time. He repeats this phrase in two more phrases, "For the present it is enough to affirm the equal manhood of the Negro race" and "the manhood of the slave is conceded" (Douglass, 1852). Furthermore, he provides a significant amount of evidence that supports his proposition, but those statements only highlight his circular argument, because he always begins not with the proposition that a slave is human, but with the proposition that nobody doubts that slaves are human. The third fallacy that Douglass employs is the appeal to belief. "Appeal to Belief is a fallacy that has this general pattern: Most people believe that a claim, X, is true. Therefore X is true. This line of 'reasoning' is fallacious because the fact that many people believe a claim does not, in general, serve as evidence that the claim is true" (Nizkor Project, Description of appeal to belief, 2011). Douglass states, "There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven who does not know that slavery is wrong for him" (Douglass, 1852). However, this does not mean that slavery is necessarily wrong. For example, the same statement could be made of prisoners, but the majority of the population would argue that prison is appropriate for criminals.

To a modern audience, Frederick Douglass' famous speech the Hypocrisy of American Slavery, which he delivered after being asked to speak on the Fourth of July, seems like a reasonable argument...

However, it is important to keep in mind that Douglass was not speaking to a modern audience, but a country where roughly half of people supported the institution of slavery. This audience would have been very aware of any errors in Douglass' argument. In his speech, he employed three logical fallacies, which actually weakened his very strong condemnation of slavery. He used an ad hominem fallacy when suggesting that God would never approve an inhumane practice like slavery; a begging the question fallacy when he suggested that nobody doubts that slaves are men; and an appeal to belief when suggesting that because slaves all find slavery objectionable, it must be morally wrong. These arguments would not have been persuasive to people who were invested in the idea of slavery, given that the inhumanity of slaves and divine providence were two common arguments people made in favor of slavery. However, for an audience that supported Douglass, these fallacies would not have been as evident, because they would have taken the statements as true without requiring Douglass to support them.
References

Douglass, F. (1852, July 4). The Hypocrisy of American Slavery. Retrieved February 20, 2012

from the History Place website: http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/douglass.htm

The Nizkor Project. (2011). Description of ad hominem. Retrieved February 20, 2012 from http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ad-hominem.html

The Nizkor Project. (2011). Description of appeal to belief. Retrieved February 20, 2012 from http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-belief.html

The Nizkor Project. (2011). Description of begging the question. Retrieved February 20, 2012

from http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/begging-the-question.html

Sources used in this document:
References

Douglass, F. (1852, July 4). The Hypocrisy of American Slavery. Retrieved February 20, 2012

from the History Place website: http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/douglass.htm

The Nizkor Project. (2011). Description of ad hominem. Retrieved February 20, 2012 from http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ad-hominem.html

The Nizkor Project. (2011). Description of appeal to belief. Retrieved February 20, 2012 from online
from http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/begging-the-question.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Slavery Narratives Basing Their Arguments
Words: 924 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Both religion and the law purport to advocate human rights, freedoms, and liberties. Yet neither religion nor the law can offer any justification for the dichotomy of slavery. No logic can sustain the argument that slavery is humane or just, and the brilliance of Jacobs' and Douglass' lsave narratives is their mutual ability to expose the fallacies in both religion and the law. The optimism with which the authors

Awakening, Which Might Have Been More Aptly
Words: 2043 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Awakening, which might have been more aptly titled, The Sexual Awakening shocked the delicate and rigid sensibilities of Kate Chopin's contemporaries of 1899, although many of those contemporaries were slowly experiencing awakenings of their own. In telling the story of a married woman who begins to realize that she is an individual human being, rather than a nonentity made up of female roles assigned by a male-dominated society, Chopin immediately

Africa and the Anthropologist
Words: 1903 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

Africa and the Anthropologist Literature Review AFRICA AND THE ANTHROPOLOGIST: LITERATURE REVIEW The work of Lefkowitz (2012) and the work of Bernal (1996) oppose one another on the history of Greece as it relates to the history of Egypt with each of these authors making valid points for their argument however, Lefkowitz stubbornly refuses to consider that anything good or worthy could have arisen out of Africa while the evidence is clearly

How Mark Twain's Use of Social Commentary and Satire Was Received...
Words: 1202 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Mark Twain's use of Social Commentary and Satire was received by African-Americans How African-Americans received mark twain's use of social commentary and satire Mark Twain (real name Samuel L. Clemens) is famous for his masterpiece Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, which was the sequel to The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. In this essay, I examine the reception of African-Americans to satire and social commentary within the work. This is, therefore, a question

Vincent Vinikas' Review of Dominic J. Capeci's
Words: 1204 Length: 4 Document Type: Case Study

Vincent Vinikas' review of Dominic J. Capeci's The Lynching of Cleo Wright takes a critical stance toward Capeci's account of the case of Cleo Wright, a black man who was lynched in Missouri in 1942. Rather than examining the underlying causes concerning why lynching took place (particularly as late as 1942), Vinikas restricts his focus to elucidating logical fallacies that hinder Capeci's article. Vinikas argues that it is lamentable

Brown V. Board of Education
Words: 1959 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

When Brown vs. Board of Education came to the courts the judges ruled that the school law allowing "separate but equal educations" was unconstitutional which set the stage for the later examination of special education students being "separate but equal" in the district's treatment of their education. I agree with the decision that was handed down and believe that one justice decision summed up the facts when it comes to any

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now