Fall of the Roman Empire Due to Christianity
The fall of Roman Empire due to Christianity
The research paper first makes a brief general overview of the ancient Roman Empire mainly looking at its' leadership structure, division of regions, senatorial and equestrian order in the empire, the religious history detailing its earlier religious practices and beliefs. The highlights or the transformations that took place before the empire finally collapsed shall also be mentioned from the third century up to the fifth century where it finally collapsed.
The research topic which is Christianity as the reason for the fall of the empire is in the third section of the paper. Various factors that were brought along with formalization of Christianity as an official language of the Roman Empire and contributed to its' downfall will be critically analyzed. Other documented causes that led to the fall of Roman Empire will also be briefly mentioned before the research is concluded.
Introduction
The research explores a topic that has being widely studied and researched upon by other authors such as Bury, J.B., History of the Later Roman Empire, (New York, 1958), 23-57[footnoteRef:2], but unlike the other studies and researches earlier done, this paper will primary look at Christianity as the main cause of the fall of the Roman Empire and try to answer questions such as; [2: Bury, J.B., History of the Later Roman Empire, (New York, 1958), 23-57,]
Was Christianity being practiced even when the Roman Empire was still united?
What were some of the changes brought about by Christianity to the Roman Empire?
Did any of these changes cause the fall of the Roman Empire?
Roman Empire
The study and research conducted by Bury, J. B and printed in his book, History of the Later Roman Empire (New York, 1958), 23-57[footnoteRef:3], show that the Roman Empire was under the rule of an Emperor appointed either by the empire's senate or his successor which was mostly the case. The emperor was the leader of Roman's civil government including the Roman Empire's senate. [3: Bury, J.B., History of the Later Roman Empire, (New York, 1958), 23-57]
The emperor exercised excessive authority and in the modern civil world the powers endowed to him could be regarded as those of an autocratic leader. The Empire's army was also under his full control and entrusted with ensuring that there was no threat to the leadership, he had the powers to decide who goes to the senate and who does not, his office could declare war against an enemy and even in religious institutions where he had membership in all the major priesthoods they were all under his authority.
Hierarchy of authority was lead by the emperor, senators came at second in command but were viewed as just sideshows they never had any real authority as compared to senators whom are in the present governments, they merely acted on emperor' mercy and at times on order given by him. To be appointed as a senator one was supposed to be a rich person coming from a well-known family. The equestrians were third in command but never had as much prestige as those above the hierarchy however their appointment criteria were similar to those of the senators.
The Empire was divided into two provinces namely; the senatorial and imperial provinces. Senatorial provinces were strategically located inland far from the borders where the ruling government had strong influence and control over them. The imperial provinces were majorly located at the borders of the empire mainly because of the fact that they were newly conquered territories that were governed by the imperial governments Sources Pirenne. Henri. The Holy Roman Empire (Walter Hamilton. London. 1957), 77-112.[footnoteRef:4] [4: Pirenne. Henri. The Holy Roman Empire (Walter Hamilton. London. 1957), 77-112.]
Important to note about these imperial provinces was the Aegyptus province that's today's modern Egypt, the Aegyptus province was a very important part of the Roman Empire as it was the major supplier of agricultural produce to the entire empire. The Roman capital of Rome also mostly dependent on it for grain supplies thus it was treated in a special manner such that Senators from other regions of the empire were restricted in entering the province. Commanders and governors in authority at this province were appointed by the emperor himself from the equestrian arm of the government and not from the traditional senatorial arm of the government.
Studies devoted to Roman Empire's religious history have reported conflicting findings; however most studies have collectively shown that...
Christianity as a Prime Reason for the Fall of the Roman Empire Some scholars place the founding of Rome to April 21, 753 B.C., but others dispute that date. As to Rome's demise, one scholar of note, historian Edward Gibbon, places the date of the fall of Rome on September 4, A.D., 476. Gibbon, who published what is considered the most authoritative book on Rome's downfall (The History of the Decline
Decius had come to the throne at a particularly crucial time. Rome had just celebrated its one thousandth year of rule in 247, but the Goths had attacked Rome in 248. Decius had forced the Goths out of the Danube provinces and in return had been hailed emperor by his troops (he would die fighting the Goths in June 251). In the midst of this crisis, Decius appealed to
E. The voices who argue that America should and could be an imperial superpower, but lacks sound practical judgment. The thesis of this paper is that the history of the Roman Empire can be matched to that of the United States in terms of economy, political power, as well as aspirations. In this sense, present day America is very similar to fourth of even fifth century Rome; this poses one stringent
fall of the Roman Empire? The decline and eventual fall of the Roman Empire happened in the third century. Rome had made many enemies and grew from a revered unchallenged leader of the Mediterranean to a rather weary empire surrounded by a myriad of enemies. Rome experienced a number of significant military defeats over the time. The most significant contributor to the fall of the empire though was the economic
Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire According to historians, the key to the establishment, survival and fall of historical societies is their use of resources and surplus income (Perkin 2002). Except for the most primitive, no society "would be able to afford the protection, law and order, administration, defense, spiritual advice, personal services, cultural production" and other essentials without "the extraction, by the elite, of products surplus to immediate requirements,
Fall of Rome Through the years, students have been taught that Roman Civilization and the Fall of Rome took place 476 A.D. when really the empire kept going for another two centuries. When considering such an event it is important to define the framework of examination. First, it is important to define "fall" in this context. Second, it is important to discuss the factors of emperors, Barbarians and Christianity and how
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now