Indeed, all rights, basic or not, are removed when the inmate enters the prison system. This is part of the system that destroys the former identity of the prisoner completely. Not only all self-respect, but also all respect from others, are removed from the prisoner. This destruction of respect is used by the prison system in order to keep control over the inmates. The only way in which inmates can the react is to become part of the subcultures, where they can at least earn respect from their fellow inmates, and perhaps regain some sense of self-respect.
Finally, the ideal of hope is also completely destroyed within the prison, and it is directly related to the prison sentence. A person with a life sentence for example, has little hope of release, even on parole. The destruction of hope is part of the destruction of the other basic elements of humanity. It is also one of the tools that officials use to keep control of the prisoners. Together with fear and a lack of respect, the prisoner's dehumanization is complete when removing his sense of hope. And indeed, hope is the one element that cannot be regained by joining a subculture, unless it the hope for advancing to a leadership position, or the hope of not being injured or killed by one's rivals.
Every human being has a basic need for respect, hope and safety. The correctional policy at the facility where Inmate is housed is particularly aimed at the destruction of all these in order to keep control of the prison inmates. The policy is therefore not aimed at any form of rehabilitation, but rather at punishing prisoners in the most senseless way possible for their crimes. This punishment relates to dehumanization, and the ultimate effect is that prisoners who do manage to reenter society, find it very hard to readjust to the world outside of prison.
d. In the light of the above, I would suggest several changes to the facility, and indeed to the entire prison system. Firstly, I would advocate the preservation of a prisoner's dignity and sense of safety. I would then use these as a basis for rehabilitation rather than control. As it is, officials are focused on control, based upon a paradigm of assumption. Officials assume that prisoners will reoffend once they reenter society. They also assume that prisoners will never change and therefore do not give them the opportunity to do so. The current system is therefore locked into a cycle of ineffectual and overcrowded prisons.
The first change I would therefore suggest is better treatment once prisoners enter the system. The shower, searching and other procedures should be handled with more respect towards the...
Oshinsky, "Worse Than Slavery" David Oshinsky's history of "convict labor" in the Reconstruction-era American South bears the title Worse Than Slavery. The title itself raises questions about the role played by moralistic discourse in historiography, and what purpose it serves. Oshinsky certainly paints a grim picture of the systematic use of African-American prisoners at Parchman Farm -- the focus of his study -- and throughout the South after the Civil War.
Over 1,000 Chinese witnesses came forth to testify in the trials which lasted until February of 1947 after the Chinese government posted notices in Nanking regarding the need for credible witnesses, (Chang 1997:170). Unlike the Nuremburg Trials, however, much of the case against the Japanese fell apart thanks to faulty prosecution and a lack of true concern for justice in the region. The events which conspired in Nanking during the
Good Man is Hard to Find by Flannery O'Connor. Specifically, it will focus on the use of comedy/humor, foreshadowing, and irony in the work. Flannery O'Connor is one of the South's most well-known writers, and nearly all of her works, including this short story, take place in Southern locales. Her work embodies the Southern lifestyle, which includes close family ties, attention to family roots, and a more laid-back and
The U.S., however, is the only industrial democracy, common law or otherwise, in which courts must throw out tainted evidence in criminal trials. The U.S. Supreme Court decisions establishing and expanding on this principle have collectively come to be known as the "exclusionary rule." Although the rule had its origins in arguments about the morality of obtaining a conviction while relying on improperly obtained evidence, its primary modern justification
ethnicity influences courtroom proceedings and judicial practices. The law making against racial discrimination has reduced the intensity of ethnical influences on courtroom proceedings yet the judicial practices are not free from the impurities of racist impact. Some ethnic backgrounds offer less educational facilities due to poverty that leads to criminal activities. Thus these ethnic groups are more involved in criminal judicial practices than the others. The minds of police are
controversial than a person could ever imagine. Historical interpretations must be questioned so that faulty historical thinking can be identified. One of the most complicated aspects in historical interpretations is that they are precisely that -- interpretations. This means that people cannot help but look back at history through the lens of today's history; this affects interpretation and today's interpretation will be different than yesterday or tomorrow's interpretation because
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now