Already the rapid acceleration of audit fees indicates oligopolistic behavior on the part of the Big Four (Ascher, 2008). As a result of this situation, a series of potential solutions was developed, including liability limitations that would allow auditors to avoid financial ruin in the event of another Enron-sized scandal. However, no action was taken on these options. Nonetheless, evidence has showed that audit quality has improved post-SOX, especially with respect to high-risk companies and companies formerly audited by lower-independence auditors (
Real Life Examples
When the SEC began its campaign to overhaul the auditing industry in 1998, the idea was not to change the role of auditors in corporate governance. The SEC merely wanted to enforce the role that it felt already existed. With the sweeping structural changes to the external audit industry, however, the role did change for some firms.
This was particularly in evidence at Tyco, one of the companies whose scandal prompted the SOX legislation in the first place. One of the major governance issues at Tyco was that the company paid its auditors millions of dollars in consulting fees. The company responded by ending the consulting relationship, allowing their auditors to simply conduct that task independently (Cope, 2002). The role of the audit in corporate governance shifted from that of a cursory, rubber-stamp situation to one where the audit's traditional role as a strong governance tool was restored.
Other companies, however, are not willing to make such changes. Each nation has its own version of Sarbanes-Oxley (Bhisham, 2009). Yet when they list their stocks in the United States, they must adhere to all of the terms of SOX. This dramatically increases their auditing costs. While SOX was designed to improve the role of auditing in the corporate governance function, for foreign firms it is often viewed as an expensive redundancy. English company ICI, for example, chose to delist from the New York Stock Exchange rather than deal with the added burden of modern auditing (Madigan, 2007). In essence, for firms such as ICI, the role of auditors was not changed by the structural overhaul of the industry. The cost, however, was changed. If one believes that SOX is more stringent than the rules of the London Stock Exchange, then it could be argued that by increasing the auditor's role in governance, the level of governance actually decreased.
Conclusion
For all of the changes to the auditing industry in the past ten years, the basic functional role of the external auditor has not changed much. Auditors are still not directly involved in corporate governance, but they still play an important ancillary role. Auditors are a check on the corporate governance system, operating independently, just outside of the system.
In this respect we can see the most significant change to the role of auditors in corporate governance -- the increase in importance. The audit function has become more complex in the past ten years. Poor auditing was not known to have high risks until...
" This project is considered to be the first major update to the Smith Guidance. It was felt that the update was required to shore up some of the deficiencies in the Smith Guidance that have emerged since it was published. There were characteristics of the market that it was felt needed to be addressed, in particular the oligopolistic nature, which exposed the market to considerable uncertainty in the event
boards of this type of organizations accountable? The boards of this type are accountable to the company and its stakeholders/shareholders. They are responsible for the company's overall success. Such a board has to ensure the integrity of its own actions as well as those of the company and should make every effort to present a factual and frank presentation of its current outlook to the company's stakeholders. Shareholders, thus, are the
Audit Quality and Agency Cost Since the advent of industrialization, there has been the presence of a bond between the people who invest and the people who manage those investments, forming a vital relationship amongst the two groups. Although with the rise of such relationships, the soaring issues of trust and confidence have been a hindrance in economic growth. Viewing the high percentage of the capital of investors or shareholders in
In other words, if the financial difficulties they encounter are the fault of the auditing firm, they will have protection from any legal ramifications they may have encountered from faulty accounting or auditing measures. Preventive measures are also part of the internal controls of the auditing firm itself, so that each person who works with that firm knows the measures that are to be taken to make sure auditing
Contract global employment under the Nike Code of Conduct has been altered significantly, as diversity of legal and social standards for employment come into play in Nike factories all over the world. Nike also actively seeks to allow contractor managers and employees visits to domestic operations of both management and manufacture and hires within these pools when they can to increase domestic diversity. Ethics are an essential aspect of the
Auditing function has undergone several transformations from the periods when it was simply a function of giving opinion but also to an error where auditors are looked upon to offer advisory roles. The auditors should therefore advice the government on the impacts of their operations on the public and on other improvements that can be made to maximize on the service delivery. In pursuing their taxation policies and fiscal
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now