Verified Document

Exegesis Gospel Of Mark: Background Essay

Jesus was aware that he was a subversive power. Matthew does omit the part about Jesus needing to go into hiding. This suggests that the author had less of a need to emphasize the theme of persecution than Mark did. Mark makes sure this story is told from the perspective of the oppressed. Matthew also recounts the tale of Jesus forgiving the paralyzed man, calling into question his divine authority. As with the story of the leper, Mark's version is far more dramatic than is Matthew's. In Mark's version, the aides had to cut a hole in the ceiling to deliver the man upon a stretcher. Matthew simply says that some men brought over a paralyzed man on a mat. Similarly, Matthew only has the crowd yelling once and not over and over, "This fellow is blaspheming!" (Matthew 9:3). It is almost as if the author expects that the audience will already be familiar with the story told by Mark. Moreover, Jesus appears more confident in Matthew's version. Jesus tells the angry crowd, "Why do you entertain evil thoughts in your hearts?" And then asserts his "authority" as the Son of Man (Matthew 8:4; 6). It becomes clear that Christianity itself was being increasingly viewed as mainstream by the time Matthew delivered his Gospel.

Luke 5

If Matthew's Gospel is filled with a more confident tone than was Mark's, then Luke's is even more so. The confidence with which Luke tells the stories of Jesus's healing does not preclude the author from using a deft narrative style. Luke resurrects the anecdote about Jesus retreating after he healed the man with leprosy. Only in Luke, the author does not imply that Jesus did this to hide from the authorities. Instead, Jesus simply "withdrew to lonely places and prayed," (Luke 5:16).

When Jesus forgives and heals the paralyzed man, Luke tells the story quite differently from Mark and Matthew. In Luke's version it is not just a crowd of Jewish onlookers who are perturbed by Jesus's proclamation of forgiveness. Now, the angry mob includes "The Pharisees and the teachers of the law," who "began thinking to themselves, 'Who is this fellow who speaks blasphemy? Who can forgive sins but God alone?," (Luke 5:21). The difference between the Mark and Matthew accounts and the Luke accounts is politically...

Here, Luke is purposely interjecting the Jewish authorities as being directly antagonistic towards Christ. Any lingering anti-Semitism present in the Gospel of Matthew has come to fruition in the Gospel of Luke.
Conclusion

Mark, Matthew, and Luke convey the life and teachings of Jesus in their respective gospels. However similar the stories may seem on the surface, close textual readings reveal striking differences in the authors' accounts. These differences may be traced to the historical, social, and political contexts in which the Gospels were written. Biblical exegesis clarifies the canonization of the Christian gospel and traces the evolution of Christianity from a divergent Jewish sect into a full-fledged, self-assured religious authority.

References

Aherne, C. (1910). Gospel of Saint Luke. In the Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved November 30, 2010 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09420a.htm

Donahue, J.R. & Harrington, D.J. (2002). The Gospel of Mark. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.

"The Gospel of Mark" (n.d.). Retrieved online: http://www.abu.nb.ca/courses/ntintro/mark.htm

Harrington, D.J (1991). The Gospel of Matthew. Collegeville: Liturgical.

Jacquier, J.E. (1911). Gospel of St. Matthew. In the Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved November 30, 2010 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10057a.htm

Johnson, L.T. (1991). The Gospel of Luke. Collegeville: Liturgical.

Kirby, P. (2006). Gospel of Luke. Early Christian Writings. 2 Feb 2006. Retrieved online: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/luke.html

Kirby, P. (2006). Gospel of Mark. Early Christian Writings. 2 Feb 2006. Retrieved online: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/mark.html

Kirby, P. (2006). Gospel of Matthew. Early Christian Writings. 2 Feb 2006. Retrieved online: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/matthew.html

MacRory, J. (1910). Gospel of Saint Mark. In the Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved November 30, 2010 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09674b.htm

Sources used in this document:
References

Aherne, C. (1910). Gospel of Saint Luke. In the Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved November 30, 2010 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09420a.htm

Donahue, J.R. & Harrington, D.J. (2002). The Gospel of Mark. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.

"The Gospel of Mark" (n.d.). Retrieved online: http://www.abu.nb.ca/courses/ntintro/mark.htm

Harrington, D.J (1991). The Gospel of Matthew. Collegeville: Liturgical.
Jacquier, J.E. (1911). Gospel of St. Matthew. In the Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved November 30, 2010 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10057a.htm
Kirby, P. (2006). Gospel of Luke. Early Christian Writings. 2 Feb 2006. Retrieved online: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/luke.html
Kirby, P. (2006). Gospel of Mark. Early Christian Writings. 2 Feb 2006. Retrieved online: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/mark.html
Kirby, P. (2006). Gospel of Matthew. Early Christian Writings. 2 Feb 2006. Retrieved online: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/matthew.html
MacRory, J. (1910). Gospel of Saint Mark. In the Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved November 30, 2010 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09674b.htm
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Exegesis to Understand 2 Corinthians As a
Words: 2363 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

Exegesis To understand 2 Corinthians as a letter, one must first understand the context in which it was written. This was Paul's second letter to the Christian church at Corinth. His first letter had been less than kind, admonishing the Corinthian church for what Paul saw as many deficiencies in their manner of living and worship. As might be expected, the original letter was not exactly welcome by the Corinthians, and

Gospels the Bible Is Probably
Words: 8212 Length: 30 Document Type: Term Paper

Much literary criticism assumes that the gospels are not necessarily historical or else it plays down theological or religious context. However, these assumptions are not inherent in the method; a well-crafted piece of historical writing also promotes certain ideological concerns in an artistic and aesthetically pleasing (Bloomberg)." Now that we have garnered a greater understanding of the climate of Israel at the time of Jesus Christ and the criticisms that

Exegesis of Pauls Letter to Philemon
Words: 1752 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Socio-Historical Background: Book Of Philemon The epistle of Paul to Philemon has often been called a captivity epistle because it was written when Paul was imprisoned because of his Christian faith. The frequent references to the Church and to Philemon's house underline the fact that Paul likely intended this to be a public, instructive letter, not simply a private document conveying information (Witherington 54). Philemon is usually studied in conjunction with

Exegesis of the Book of
Words: 2360 Length: 7 Document Type: Research Paper

6). For the early Christians, the Holy Spirit was experienced as a real power in their lives . The Holy Spirit empowered them to continue the work of Jesus. When a person received the Holy Spirit, they experienced a difference in their lives -- and others noticed it. That is still true today.Although all Christians receive the Holy Spirit through Baptism, God's Spirit works in many ways in the world, in both

Deity of Christ in the Gospel of John
Words: 8534 Length: 25 Document Type: Research Paper

Deity of Christ in the Gospel of John In John's Gospel, the term Son of God is used very frequently but people do not derive the spirituality of Jesus from this title, in fact they refer this title to the messianic position of Jesus. Such a belief has put forward a number of interesting questions, because according to John (20:30-31), in order to obtain an eternal life one needs to have

Explaining the Parable of the Great Dinner
Words: 2503 Length: 7 Document Type: Research Paper

Exegesis of Luke 14:14-21 Luke 14:14-21 is situated within the larger context of the Messiah's time teaching the Pharisees and attempting to get them to understand why He would "eat with sinners" (Luke 15:2) and spend time in their company. It is connected to His overall Divine Mission, and MacArthur notes that this mission can be found in Scripture, where one sees the whole of the Will of God.[footnoteRef:1] The main

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now