Europe After World War II
Historical Development Unification
Historical Development of Unification Ideas in Europe after World War II
Europe was torn to shreds by the ugly forms of national and ethnic hatred after World War II (1939-1945). Europe is geographically situated in middle of such a global power system, where failing of peace means global annihilation. After World War II, the Europeans established such a framework that can allow peace and regional cooperation to be fostered. They wanted to establish a "Common Market," that got established by 1957. The purpose of writing this essay is to highlight the historical development of Unification ideas in Europe after World War II.
Historical Development of Unification Ideas in Europe after World War II
Europe suffered both economical and political crises after World War II. The creation of European Union took place, various treaties were signed and some effective movements came in to being. Functionalism and federalism took place. This essay discusses some of the historical development of unification ideas in Europe after World War II.
Treaty of Paris (1951)
In the year 1950, Robert Schuman, the French Foreign Minister proposed the placement of production of German coal and steel under common High Authority. He wanted all the European countries to participate in this production that could take place within a framework of an organization. This challenge was accepted by the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, France and Germany. These countries began negotiating a treaty. The simple idea of this development was inspired by Jean Monnet, who was the senior French civil servant. He had given the original proposal in the year 1950. Although his idea was simple but the countries that accepted this challenged wanted a complex whole. The Treaty was for the establishment of European Coal and Steel Community and it was signed on 18th April 1951 in Paris. It had a valid time period of fifty years and it had an expiry date on 23rd July 2002. The Treaty of Paris opened on 10th of February 1953 for iron core, scrap and coal. For steel, it opened on 1st of May 1953. The objective of this treaty was to contribute for steel and coal through the common market. "The treaty was seen as producing diplomatic and economic stability in Western Europe after the Second World War" (Surhone, Tennoe, & Henssonow, 2010, p. 60). It was expected that this treaty will bring economic expansion and the employment rate will increase. Also the standard of living will rise. The working conditions were to improve, the access to sources of production will be equally provided and lowest possible prices were to be established. This Treaty brought a free movement of the products without taxes and custom duties. The Treaty included two important protocols. The overall achievements of this Treaty were very positive. The Community dealt with all the crises and ensured a balance production development as well as the distribution of resources. The steel production increased and it became better and cheaper. This Treaty expired in the year 2002. Later it was amended several times by some other treaties including the Merger Treaty, Treaty on Greenland etc.
David Mitrany and the Functionalism
David Mitrany (1988-1974) spent most of his adult life in United States and Britain. He was born in Romania. He had no interest in becoming a theorist of the European integration. According to him nationalism was the root cause of the war. He wanted all the nations to get tied more closely so that the mistake of the happening of World War II should not repeat again. Mitrany was not in favor of agreement with the idea of federation. In simple words he did not want to use federation as a mean of tying all the nations. He also opposed the regional federation creation. According to him this only reproduces the national rivalries and that on a larger scale. He proposed the unique idea of creation of series of separate international functional agencies....
World War II WW II Manhattan Project: Begun in 1939, this project was the codename for the United States' secret Atomic Bomb project. With America's entry into the war, the project grew substantially and ultimately involved more than 125,000 people, 37 separate installations, 13 university laboratories and a number of the nation's top scientists. (History.com: "World War 2: Atomic Bomb") In 1942 the project was put under the control of the U.S.
Diversity -- with the exception of homophobia -- was beginning to be commonly accepted and praised. Technology -- such as the use of DNA in criminology and the introduction of the PC -- was becoming more prominent in the lives of everyday Americans. In the Cold War, President Gorbachev asked for openness and economic freedom, while President Reagan asked him to tear down the Berlin Wall, which he did.
The generally accepted reasoning behind that bombing is that thousands of United States troops would have died in a protracted war and a clear message had to be sent. Regardless of how one assesses the issue, the fallout, no pun intended, from Japan's choice was massive. Depending on how one perceives Weinberg, he did cover all of the normal bases but perceptions of his worldview may lead some to believe
The components of nuclear prevention have a physical and a psychological character. On the physical level, deterrence necessitates a series of military instruments, sufficient to threaten the opponent in a way that it would not even think of attacking. Successful deterrence is certain, however, only if the will is there to use these weapons. Deterrence is plausible only if a nation is able to successfully convey the first two points
Sonar Research and Naval Warfare: 1914-1954 During both World War I and World War II, there were a number of informational tactics used by the Navy in order to gain ground on enemy troops. One of those was sonar research, because it provided them with knowledge they would not have otherwise had (Hackmann, 1984). Sonar is not perfect, but a great deal of work has gone into it since its creation,
The demonstration in Tiananmen Square showed that there were alrge semgnets of the population that wanted change, but Deng's response was to crush the movement with violence and to assert the supremacy ofm centalzied rule once more.. These actions show some of the difficulties of independence and of developing a new political structure when many adhere to older political structures and ideas. One response is to try to wipe out
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now