Legal Ethics
• Are there situations in which a company, for the common good, must give up the economic advantage accorded by intellectual property laws?
During a crisis situation, the common good can trump an intellectual property law. The threat of anthrax was at an all-time high, and though Bayer was producing as much as it could, it could not meet the demand and thus the price for their drug was artificially inflated. Under such circumstances, with a threat that impacts national security, I believe that the common good should come before intellectual property law.
• Should Bayer have followed its own credo more than it seemingly did?
Yes, of course. Although there goal is to maximize profit, it also needs to be a sustainable company. With its past history, sharing its intellectual property in a time of crisis could offer the company much needed intangible assets. The company could have worked with outside partners to ensure demand was met at a reasonable market price.
• Was it unethical in threatening litigation to those who attempted to thwart its patent rights?
It was illegal, but it could be considered unethical. Especially since their mission statement includes provisions for the common good and helping people. Therefore their threats violated basic human decency in a time of crisis.
• And was the United States and Canada unethical in using their governmental actions in ignoring patent law to gain a negotiating edge in getting the price of Cipro lowered during the crisis?
No, I do not believe that the U.S. And Canada acted unethically in this time of crisis. Their role is to serve the public's good, not to protect company profits; especially in a time of crisis. Therefore, it would have been unethical not to intervene in the market to potential save lives of their citizens.
• Would an International Code of Ethics have assisted in this scenario?
Yes, an international code of ethics and law could have provided guidance under this situation. Given that such threats maybe more common in the future, an international protocol possibly administered in the United Nations could help in resolving disputes in international property rights and ethical decision making regarding intellectual property.
The first two determine ethicality rationally, on the basis of intent and effect, respectively. Relativism and virtue ethics take into consideration cultural differences and morality in the case of the former, and personal character in the latter. Returning to school required an ethical trade-off for me, but in the long-term both the intent and benefits of this action make it worthwhile. 5) Intellectual clarity has always been a quality I have
Teleology asserts that what right is by definition what produces good, whereas deontology believes that intent or motive determines ethical value. Relativists insist that no rational morality is ever universally correct, and that moral value differs from culture to culture, and virtue ethics that morality depends on the character(s) of the person(s) involved. I once padded a time card in high school; though the effects of this were good
" The rest of the poem deals with the seeming artificiality of life in light of the spiritual death that led man out of the Garden and into the world of Nature to begin with. 4) How does "To His Coy Mistress" compare to Herrick's "Upon Julia's Clothes"? What theme(s) and images do the two poems share? How is the treatment of women similar? Both of these poems use contrast to
Branding Affects the Buying Decision "How Does Branding Affect Consumer Purchasing?." Using this research question, analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each research method (qualitative and quantitative) within the scope of the proposed dissertation topic. Identify which method you will select (or state whether you will use a mixed methodology) and explain the reasons for your choice. DBA Qs 1 Answer The marketing guru Philip Kotler perceives branding as a "name, term,
This level of the maturity model is a transitory one and is focused more on either small, incremental gains from the first level, which is Reacting. In the Reacting layer of this proposed Branding Maturity Model, the majority of brand departments have a decidedly "every department for itself" approach to process maturity and have information flow that is purely dependent on personal productivity applications only. That is to say
Social Responsibility Company Q's current attitude towards social responsibility is not positive. Social responsibility is "an obligation, beyond that required by law, for a business to pursue long-term goals that are good for society" (Riley, 2012). Company Q. has not demonstrated through any of its actions or policies that it subscribes to this philosophy. Its current approach demonstrates the company's policy with respect to the food bank is of particular concern,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now