Higher Education: Ethics of International Student Recruitment
In recent years, the number of students crossing national borders in pursuit of education has increased significantly. This phenomenon is also referred to as 'global student mobility' and it can be attributed to the students' desire for migration, the inability to find study opportunities in their home countries, and the desire to improve their employability in their home countries. According to the National Association for College Admission Counseling, NACAC (2014), enrolments of international students at institutions of higher learning have more than quadrupled over the last three decades, from a total of 1.1 million in 1985 to 4.5 million in 2012. In fact, global mobile population is expected to exceed 7 million in 2025. Wilkins and Huisman (2011) state that the United States, United Kingdom and Australia are the three most popular destinations for international students and they account for almost 44% of students who study overseas. Since institutions of higher learning and the governments of these countries largely depend on the admission of these international students to balance budgets, to promote diversity, and to add to their income stream; some engage the services of recruitment agencies and professional admission consultants in a bid to grow their international student enrollment.
Although paid agents facilitate the recruitment process by eliminating constraints related to financial resources, capacity and market intelligence, ethical concerns have emerged regarding their use. Enberg (2013) argues that they compromise the credibility of the student recruitment process, as well as the integrity of higher learning institutions....
This text takes a detailed look at the
ethics of international student recruitment and recommends
ethical practices that are essential in maintaining the integrity of the recruitment process.
Ethical issues in international student recruitment
Economic frustrations in many countries often affect public sector spending by governments, which leads to constraints in the budgets of majority of the institutions of higher learning and a resultant need to bring in more international students for more income. Huang, Raimo, and Humfrey (2014) explain that given the competitive nature of the market, the optimal use of agents makes it easy for an institution to meet its student intake target. The agents work for different universities and they receive a commission every time a student joins a
university.
In most cases, however, the agents put their financial interests ahead of the academic interests of the students (Enberg, 2013). For instance, NACAC (2014) reports that recruitment agencies receive payments from
parents and their
children, in addition to being compensated by the institutions of higher learning. Some agencies are paid as much as $10,000 by students and double the amount if the said students want access to highly ranked institutions. Zaretsky (2013) further explains that these agencies request for larger sums of
money to fabricate documents or to arrange for rogue test takers, even when…
