Part I
Three concepts presented by Palmer (2012) that can be used to help explain the type of culture that contributed to the Columbia disaster are: 1) general endorsement of wrongdoing (Palmer, 2012, p. 69); 2) the stipulation of extenuating circumstances (Palmer, 2012, p. 72); and 3) denial of responsibility (Palmer, 2012, p. 73). In the Columbia disaster, the shuttle had been shedding foam which damaged the craft and led to its breaking apart. Engineers were aware of the issue and expressed concern to their superiors; however, the superiors let it be known that they believed the project to be in a good state overall—so the engineers accepted the opinion of the superiors and did nothing to prevent the launch. It was an example of collective rationalization and self-censorship with engineers trusting that their superiors knew what was best. Instead of blowing the whistle on the program, the concerned engineers kept quiet. The culture at NASA was such that there was an acceptance of the general endorsement of wrongdoing, the assumption that what was wrong could actually be right, and a basic denial of responsibility.
The first concept, the general endorsement of wrongdoing, could be defined as an overall acceptance within the culture of a willingness to look the other way whenever a problem occurred. If no one is raising an alarm of an issue then it must be that the issue is not really an issue at all. This type of thinking is akin to burying one’s head in the sand: it creates a culture of permissiveness that is ruinous because it allows wrongdoing to proliferate. In the case of the Columbia disaster, the tragedy could have been prevented had a handful of people been willing to buck the trend—but the culture of general endorsement of wrongdoing had already been put in place and as a result no one was willing to lift his head out of the sand to really prevent the mission from proceeding onward.
The second concept, the stipulation of extenuating circumstances, could be defined as the assumption that even if something is wrong if the higher-ups are unwilling to address it then there must be good reason for it so perhaps what seems wrong to the lower-level workers is actually okay. It is a type of self-censorship based on the assumption that the superiors know best so lower-level workers should just be quiet about problems that the superiors do not want to be bothered by. After all, there are targets to meet and...…as this is the only way that they can actually have a sense of what is happening at all levels. Oftentimes it happens that leaders are far removed from the front lines of the operation. An HR manager can help to improve an organization’s culture by promoting the concept of openness and hosting meetings in which all participants are encouraged to provide their two cents without fear of reprisal or of being shamed. Everyone should be thanked for his or her participation because by contributing to all discussions, everyone plays a part in keeping leaders informed about what is happening. Whenever an employee takes responsibility to bring an issue up at the top, that employee should be rewarded for being responsible and for facilitating accountability. The HR manager could also implement a whistleblower hotline for individuals who are still fearful and wish to remain anonymous when delivering news that they fear might be upsetting. The whistleblower hotline could be used as a tool to facilitate a culture of transparency in the workplace, which would further promote the concepts of openness, accountability, and respect for dissenting voices. By providing workers with every available means to feel that their opinions are welcome, HR can create a culture of responsibility and ethical decision making.…
References
Palmer, D. (2012). Normal organizational wrongdoing. UK: Oxford University Press.
Industrial Relations Employment Relationship Industrial Relations and HRM Globalization and Industrial Relations Industrial Relations in United States of America Current Response to Globalization The paper critically examines the effects of global trade expansion on national industrial relations and how USA has responded to the changing business environment to meet its economic targets. In order to understand the impact on the national industrial relations from the rise in global trade we need to study the historical factors and
Ethics Must Be Global Not Local Ethics Must Be Global, Not Local International Business Requirements Global Operations Global Business Ethics The large business units expand their operations in global markets through their own presence as well as franchising and distributors. The business operations are expanded on the basis of various standard practices. The business freedom provided by countries and various global practices are utilized as a basis for taking global operational decisions. The business also
Ethics, Corporate Governance and Company Social Responsibility OCED state-owned enterprises and Privatized companies In the past few decades, emerging economies have launched ambitious plans to privatize their state owned enterprises (SOEs). The volume of privatization in emerging economies has increased from $8 billion in 1990 to about $65 billion in 1997 (Dharwadkar, George, & Brandes, 2000). In privatization, ownership is transferred from the state to new private and public owners, which may
Upper Big Branch Mining Disaster Industrial Calamities Can Be Avoided if Companies Respected the Law Abiding by federal or state industrial laws is necessary since genuine minded legislators have processed the laws and not the profit-minded shark operating as a company executive. Laws provide a framework at which companies should follow. In most cases, laws specify the necessity of appreciating human life. Furthermore, laws provide an equal balancing of social expectations and
Employment Relations Factors affecting 'Fairness' in the Determination of Salaries Perhaps the first point to discuss is: What is 'fairness'? While historical roots of the word 'fair' mean 'beautiful' in German and Old English, with respect to salaries, the definition 'treating people in a way that does not favor some over others' (Merriam- Webster 2010) would be more consistent with the mental definition of fairness that most of us have. Further
Therefore, corporations have had to change their viewpoints and start looking at the long-term consequences of their behavior, as well as looking at the bottom line. Businesses also have to be concerned because consumers have also become aware of environmental concerns, and many consumers are demanding earth-friendly products and have shown a willingness to pay more money to competitors who observe environmentally-friendly practices. Interestingly enough, this demand has given rise
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now