Strategy Implementation: Introductory Instruction
I feel that new meanings for known words is not exactly what it sounds like. We are not giving new meanings to words, but rather expressing the same meaning using a new approach. I don’t like the idea of words taking on new meaning arbitrarily. If it happens organically over time, that is one thing—but for people to take words and announce that they are changing the meaning of the word is not something I like to do. In the classroom I try to get the students to think of new ways to express the meaning of certain words or to define certain words. We will acknowledge the known meaning, as Block, Gambrell and Pressley (2002) say to do, but when it comes to giving new meaning, I tell the students that we are putting the meaning into different words that make sense for us. So it is really an exercise in finding creative ways to express an idea by using a new approach. I think this is basically the essence of the exercise.
Afterwards, we discuss the similarities and differences between how a word is traditionally defined and how our definition sees it. We look at the words and ideas that we came up with and examine what they suggest and why they might work or not work. It is a good and fun exercise because it teaches the students to think more precisely and to be cautious about the way they use words when communicating.
The students enjoy the exercise as they view it as a kind of brain teaser. They are forced to think outside the box and to really consider what a word means. They find that when it is incumbent upon them to define the word and explain it, they must think about what they really know. Can they explain what a word means? And if they can’t, can they actually say that they know what a word means? These are the questions I ask of them in order to get them to think more deeply about the subject.
References
Block, C. C., Gambrell, L. B., & Pressley, M. (2002). Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice. Jossey-Bass: Newark.
Brevity is also necessary because reading for content and for linguistic problem solving is the focus" (Kruger). In contrast to the brevity of the intensive program the extensive program "consists of longer selections, that are assigned to be read outside of class, like novels or short stories" (Kruger). Of course a major goal of the program was English language knowledge and reading comprehension, but "Vocabulary building is an intrinsic part
They also use language to negotiate with parents and teachers for pocket money and extra time for assignments respectively, and so on. All these contexts can be used to provide students with a familiar and supportive environment of learning. The most important element that emerges from this chapter is the fact that students can no longer be seen as homogeneous automatons, who learn language in precisely the same way. Human
Music on Vocabulary Competence, Writing, Reading Comprehension and Motivation in English Language Learning in High-School EFFECTIVENESS OF MUSIC ON VOCABULARY The Effectiveness of Music on Vocabulary Competence, Writing, Reading Comprehension and Motivation in English Language Learning in High-School Most English language learners in high schools show poor vocabulary competence. The main reason for this is the limited level of exposure to the language. It is generally understood and practically acknowledged that words
Wardhaugh indicates that there is a problematic need in the field to reverse expectations about the capacity of this approach to instruct in practicable and usable linguistic ability. The author takes exception with traditionalist ideas the argue "the single paramount fact about language learning is that it concerns, not problem solving, but the formation and performance of habits." (Wardhaugh, p. 21) The linguistic theorist rejects this principle as failing
Phonetic reading methods are actually older than the whole language approach: "The traditional theory of learning established in the 19th century draws on the notion that children need to break down a complex skill, like reading, into its smallest components (letters) before moving on to tackle larger components (sounds, words, and sentences). Phonetic reading instruction applies this theory; children are taught to dissect unfamiliar words into parts and then join
ELLs frequently disappear in these comprehensive settings. Similar interpretations about mainstreaming have been made in other English-speaking countries such as Australia, Britain and Canada, where ELLs are also categorized and served under a larger authority of diversity education or literacy education intended for native English speakers who may have learning requirements very dissimilar from their own (Harper and de Jong, 2009). Teaching approaches are founded on theories. ESL teachers often
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now