¶ … Equity and Weighted Average Cost of Capital
The cost of equity is defined by InvestorWords.com as follows.
The rate of return required by a company's common stockholders.
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital, on the other hand, is defined by Ofcom as follows.
The weighted average cost of capital measures the rate of return that a firm needs to earn in order to reward its investors.
From these two elements, the reason why financial managers don't use as little debt as possible to keep the cost of equity down can be derived. Usually, a company makes debts not because of negative causes. It is frequently due to a strategy of a company to use debts as capital on investments where there can be a high rate of ROI. If a company will use as little debt as possible, then the chance of increasing its investments and gaining returns will similarly lessen. Consequently, this can lessen the cost of equity (shareholder's rate of return expectations) because there is lesser investments from which the shareholders can expect earnings. As the cost of equity lessens, the weighted average cost of capital (company's needed rate of return to reward to investors) will similarly lessen. A company will require lesser WACC when the expected rate of return of the shareholders decreases. Despite of this proportional requirements in rate of return, it is however not an advantage for a company to have a decreasing cost of equity and decreasing weighted average cost of capital because it will only mean that the company's earning also decreases. As what accounting principle indicates, as a company earns less, the shareholders also earn less; and, as a company's income increases, the shareholder's income similarly increases. Therefore, using as little debt as possible is not considered by financial managers because it will cause lesser income for both the company and its investors.
References
Office of Communication
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/mofaq/telecoms/costcapital2/?a=87101
Cost of Equity
http://www.investorwords.com/1156/cost_of_equity_capital.html
Calculate Touring Enterprises' weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Work as follows: first, compute the after-tax cost of debt, then compute the cost of equity. WACC = E/V x Re + D/V x Rd x (1 - Tc) Re = cost of equity Rd = cost of debt E = market value of the firm's equity D = market value of the firm's debt V = E + D = firm value E/V = percentage of financing that
Capital Structure A project should not be evaluated in terms of capital structure. The financing of a project is a decision that is independent of the decision to undertake a project. This flows from the Modigliani and Miller Theorem where the choice of financing is irrelevant to the returns of the asset, all other factors being equal (Investopedia, 2012). The firm may have a preference for one type of financing or
Capital Structure A company's capital structure is the balance of different methods of financing that provides funding for the company's operations. The basic breakdown is between debt and equity, but preferred shares may also factor into the capital structure. Debt includes all forms of liabilities, including both long-term debt and current liabilities. Equity includes both the book value of shares issued and the company's retained earnings. The market value of the
Approximately 19% of the short-term liabilities in the form of notes payable and other short-term debt. The long-term liabilities consist of long-term debt and other miscellaneous liabilities. The debt portion of this represents approximately 39% of the total long-term liabilities. Johnson & Johnson has issued notes onto the market that mature in 2017, comprising the bulk of the long-term debt. The calculate the market value capital structure of JNJ, we need
Capital Structure Analysis: Mattel, Clorox and MGM Resorts According to a report in the Journal of Applied Economics, companies with earnings/price ratios that are higher than their estimated after-tax borrowing costs, like Mattel, demonstrate that managers of publicly traded companies are in fact reluctant to make capital structure changes. Clorox, and MGM Resorts International also fit into this category, per my hypothesis. I suggest a radical move for these risk-averse managers
But even with no cost savings whatsoever, this project has a positive NPV. We can see, therefore, that the greatest area of sensitivity is with the terminal value. The terminal value at present is worth $143 million of the NPV. If we break down the variables that go into the terminal value, however, we notice that the cost savings are critical. If SGA expense is not reduced, then the terminal
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now