Aim or Scope (problem being addressed)
To investigate whether air pollution causes harmful health effects on populations with inequitable income distribution in US.
To estimate the impacts of particulate matter air pollution on longevity and health.
Participants,
when and where
Two datasets observations
First dataset conducted from 2000-2010.
Second dataset included three yearly observations; 2000, 2005, and 2010.
Study conducted in 49 states of District of Columbia and US.
Entire population bordering United States at county and national level.
Study conducted from 1999-2015 in the United States
Context and framework
The study was based on US context.
Three theoretical principles were used, i.e. physiology, proximity, and power whereby a two-way-fixed effects model and regression estimation techniques were used.
Context was the United States.
Four models of bayesian spatiotemporal models were used, i.e. an integrated geographical regression model, covariate model, unadjusted model, and regression model.
Main results
or findings
The results showed that low-income states with high levels of fine particulate matter had lower life expectancy.
Particulate matter pollution was associated with an increased risk of unintentional injuries, malignant neoplasms, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, cerebrovascular disease, and heart disease - all of which are associated with higher mortality.
The results indicated that loss of life expectancy was high in counties with high poverty rate and lower income.
Particulate matter pollution was associated with cardiorespiratory diseases which led to high death rates in the said counties.
Implications Practice or Research
Future research should be carried out in environmental justice and social epidemiology to explore the health implications related to air pollution and income inequality.
Lowering the levels of particulate matter air pollution will likely lower health inequalities and have significant benefits on health in US population
Your comments (include limitations)
Data from the study was only limited to ten years, i.e. 2000-2010. In addition, only one indicator was used. Essentially, air quality was indicated by fine particulate matter, health was only based on average life expectancy, and inequality in income was based on top 10% income shares. Further, the model used resulted in conservative coefficients. Therefore, the results of the study are conservative estimates.
The study was based on observational studies which cannot be guaranteed as being causal. There was no annual data at county-level and other determinants of mortality such as diet, quality, and access to healthcare.
Reference
3. Finkelstein, M. M., Jerrett, M., DeLuca, P., Finkelstein, N., Verma, D. K., Chapman, K. & Sears, M. R. (2003). Relation Between Income, Air Pollution and Mortality: A Cohort Study. CMAJ, 169(5), 397-402.
4. Reddy, K. S. & Roberts, J. H. (2019). The Impact of Air Pollution on Deaths, Disease Burden,...
…determinant in terms of how the community was exposed to air pollution. In addition, most of the persons in low-income neighborhoods were unemployed. Moreover, the rate of disease burden in the said families was high - including diseases such as cardiovascular diseases and respiratory diseases.Common Frameworks
Common framework used to estimate mortality was the regression model
Common Findings
From the four articles, it was observed that low income families with high exposure to air pollution were at a higher risk of mortality.
Implications or Recommendations
It is important to explore the implications of air pollution to the community. In addition, low-income families should be educated on various methods of preventing or reducing air pollution so as to reduce its effects. The said families should be provided with employment so that they can prevent indoor air pollution.
Discrepancies or Limitations
The studies in both articles were conducted in urban areas. Therefore, communities from rural areas were left out and thus it would be hard to determine whether air pollution leads to lower life expectancy in low income families across the board. Adequate research requires that these areas be included.
Was your focus maintained?
Yes?
No?
Partially?...
Yes
Based on your work, how would you modify or reframe your initial research question?
How does air pollution cause diseases that lead to lower…
Environmental Health Website Review Environmental Health In today's technologically complex society we are all exposed to potentially harmful agents at work, home, school, and in the great outdoors. Tracking the levels of exposure in the United States is the responsibility of the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), but other non-governmental organizations have been formed in response to this concern and are providing complementary information
LD50 values are not always given on the pesticide label; rather, the relative toxicity of a pesticide product is exposed by one of three signal words: DANGER, WARNING, or CAUTION. The rationale for signal words is to alert the user to the level of toxicity of the product. The signal word is usually assigned based on the pesticide's inhalation, oral or dermal toxicity, whichever is the most toxic" (Lethal
Environmental Science In the late 1970s and early 1980s after her son, James Anderson, was diagnosed with leukemia, Anne Anderson discovered that a number of other children in her neighborhood also had the disease. Concerned about what seemed like an unusually high number of leukemia cases, Anderson and other Woburn, Massachusetts families set out to find a possible source of their children's illness. In 1986, personal injury lawyer Jan Schlichtmann and
Environmental Health Administration The objective of this study is to examine methods of controlling agents that cause disease, communicable disease control, wastewater treatment, swimming pool guidelines, solid waste management insect and rodent control, radiation control and environmental management. Environmental health is described as "the art and science of protecting against environmental factors that may adversely impact human health or the ecological balances essential to long-term human health and environment quality." (Gordon,
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH: LOW INCOME FAMILIES/PEOPLEEnvironmental Health: Low Income Families/PeopleMy health promotion program involved environmental health among low income families. Environmental health happens to be a critical issue among low income families owing to poor conditions the said population live in. For instance, low-income families tend to be more susceptible to environmental conditions owing to poor housing conditions. According to Kriegler and Higgins (2002), housing happens to be a major predictor
Environmental HealthProgram evaluation refers to the systematic assessment of data on outcomes, characteristics, and activities of a program with the aim of improving the effectiveness of the said program (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, n. d.). Program evaluation can also help demonstrate the impact of a program in order to make decisions about the program. Different stages or aspects of a program are assesses by various types of evaluation.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now