Enron (Movie) analysis
The Smartest Guys in the Room-Enron
The film is pitched around the America's seventh largest corporation that was in charge of distributing electricity and natural gas. The company was worth over 70 billion dollars in assets built over years with over 22,000 employees, it became bankrupt within 24 days. The employees lost their jobs and medical insurance, 1.2 billion in retirement benefits while the retirees lost 2 billion dollars in pension funds. The company collapsed so fast in a scandal of complicated transactions and accounting practices that shocked the corporate America. Before its bankruptcy, it was viewed by many as the new business model and the future of energy and power in America, voted six consecutive years by Fortune magazine as the most innovative company in America.
The film reveals how unethical the executives were by walking away with billions of dollars and leaving investors and pensioners with nothing. The president of the company Mr. Louis Burquet took 3 million dollars of the corporate funds and diverted it to his personal offshore account. The top executives Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling are being referred to as "The Smartest Guys In The Room" and "captains of a ship, too strong to go down." They pushed for the deregulation of the energy markets and Kenneth Lay became part of the crusade to shield the businessmen from the rules and regulations of the government. Jeff Skilling came up with a brilliant idea that transformed Enron into a stock market where energy supplies could be transferred into financial instruments that could be traded like stocks and bonds, hence the beginning of problems at Enron. He further introduced an accounting method known as "mark to market" a technique used by the brokers where the calculation of profits or losses were done on a daily basis. This technique was used to view future contracts of the company as current income and used to inflate revenues by manipulating numbers. The film shows how the numbers...
" While there are factors like peer pressure and authority that come into play, some research claims to have isolated significant features of an individual's character that make them more likely to commit acts of fraud, bribery and falsification in the corporate context (27, 2009). For example, those people with "high levels of ambition were more likely to transgress moral codes, competitively stab colleagues in the back and make dubious
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now