Verified Document

Employment Law Term Paper

Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services STATUATE SUMMARY

The case presents the question whether workplace harassment violates Title VII's prohibition to "discriminate . . . because of . . . sex" when the harasser and the harassed employee are of the same sex.

COURT DECISION BRIEF

The Petitioner, Joseph Oncale worked as a roustabout on an eight-man crew for Sundowner Offshore Services on a Chevron U.S.A oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico from August to November 1991. The crew included the respondents, John Lyons, Danny Pippen, and Brandon Johnson.

Lyons, Pippen and Johnson on several occasions, forcibly subjected Oncale to sex-related, humiliating actions in the presence of the rest of the crew. Pippen and Lyons also physically assaulted Oncale in a sexual manner, and Lyons threatened him with rape. Specifically, Lyons placed his penis on Oncale's neck on one occasion and on his arm on another occasion. Lyons also forcefully pushed a bar of soap into Oncale's anus while Pippen restrained Oncale as he was showering on Sundowner premises. ("Oncale v Sundowner ... " Equal Rights Advocate 2005)

Oncale complained to company's supervisory personnel but to no avail. In fact, Sundowner's Safety Compliance Clerk told Oncale that Lyons and Pippen picked on him too, calling him a name that suggested homosexuality. Oncale finally quit his job, requesting that his pink slip indicate that he voluntarily left due to sexual harassment and verbal abuse. During his deposition, Oncale stated: "I felt that if I didn't leave my job, I would be raped or forced to have sex."

Joseph Oncale filed a Title VII action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The District Court, relying on the Fifth Circuit's decision in Garcia v. Elf Atochem North America (1994) held that "... A male, has no cause of action under Title VII for harassment by male co-workers." On appeal, the Fifth Circuit affirmed. Oncale filed his petition for certiorari to the United...

sex" even if consisting of same-sex sexual harassment is actionable under Title VII. The Court thus reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and the case was remanded to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. ("U.S. Supreme Court No. 96-568," 1998-Text of judgment from FindLaw)
IMPLICATIONS ANALYSIS

Being the first case in which same-sex sexual harassment was held actionable under Title VII, Oncale v Sundowner is considered to be a landmark ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to Oncale, the state and federal courts in the United States had taken "a bewildering array of stances" while ruling in sexual harassment cases. Some decisions, like Garcia v. Elf Atochem North America, flatly rejected the application of Title VII to same-sex sexual harassment. Others, like McWilliams v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors (CA 4, 1996) ruled that claims of same-sex sexual harassment are actionable only if the plaintiff can prove that the harasser is homosexual. Still others suggested that workplace harassment that is sexual in content is always actionable, regardless of the harasser's sex, sexual orientation, or motivations. ("U.S. Supreme Court No. 96-568," 1998)

Hence, the decision in Oncale at least made one thing clear: Title VII applied to same sex sexual harassment. It also clarified that sexual orientation of the harassed or the harasser was not an issue in cases of sexual harassment. The parties involved may be heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual and whether the motivation behind same-sex harassment is sexual desire or not; if sexual harassment has taken place, it is actionable under Title VII.

The ruling clarified that recognizing liability for same-sex harassment will not transform Title VII into a general civility code for the American workplace since Title VII does…

Sources used in this document:
References

"Oncale v Sundowner Offshore Services." (2005). Equal Rights Advocates. September 15, 2005.<http://www.equalrights.org/publications/reports/briefing/oncale.asp>

"Oncale v Sundowner Offshore Services." (2005). From Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia. September 15, 2005. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oncale_v._Sundowner_Offshore_Services>

"Same Sex Harassment." (2002). Employer-Employee.com. September 15, 2005. <http://www.employer-employee.com/sexhar4.html>

"U.S. Supreme Court No. 96-568" (1998). FindLaw for Legal Professionals. Text of the judgment. In Joseph Oncale, Petitioner v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. September 15, 2005. <http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&; vol=000& invol=96-568>
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Employment Law
Words: 2872 Length: 10 Document Type: Research Paper

Employment Law Case One: A. Ms. Riyadh is employed as an account executive with ABC Advertising ("ABC"). ABC is a national marketing and advertising firm specializing in domestic and international advertising. ABC has its corporate headquarters in this state and represents many major public and private corporations throughout the United States. Ms. Riyadh began working with ABC as a summer intern during her senior year in business school, and was hired

Employment Laws
Words: 1031 Length: 4 Document Type: Research Paper

Employment Laws The purpose of this research report is to find out the employment laws which are most important to be considered for a Human Resource Department. This research also aims to provide the solutions to avoid the litigation in hiring and firing processes. The role of a Vice President in the HR department brings along a number of responsibilities. One of the most important is to make sure that all the

Employment Law
Words: 1380 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Employment Law Hypothetical Case: John is an employee in a private sector organization. He wants to file a discrimination complaint against his employer. How will he proceed? Laws Prohibiting Job Discrimination There are several U.S. federal laws that prohibit job discrimination. These include Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: The law prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Equal Pay Act of 1963: Prohibits sex-based wage discrimination. Age Discrimination in Employment

Employment Law
Words: 691 Length: 2 Document Type: A2 Coursework

Employment Law Role of Employers and Government Agencies Roger Karnes (2009) cites Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol" as an intellectual template for thinking about employer and employee relations, with the inherent warning that the boardroom will always put profits first, even at the expense of an employee's health and safety. During the 20th century, a social contract emerged between employees and employers that provided long-term employment, fair wages, and in some cases

Employment Law
Words: 3443 Length: 13 Document Type: Term Paper

This decision overturned the previous decision in Atkins v. Children's Hospital which held that a state maximum hour law was an unconstitutional infringement on the right of freedom of contract and hence a violation of the Due Process Clause. The justification of the Court's reversal was based upon the declaration that a public interest was vested in ensuring an adequate level of wages for working individuals; 2) Jones and Laughlin

Employment Law
Words: 1038 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Employment Law Business Law As the HR Manager for the software development company MicroSonic Inc., I was required to retain the services of a headhunter in order to quickly fill the position of a project manager for a federal government contract to develop within one year software for the military. Unfortunately, halfway through the project the position became available because the previous project manager had died of a heart attack. The headhunter produced

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now