Verified Document

Employee Privacy Case Study

Employee Privacy The objective of this study is to read the case Deal V. Spears United States Court Of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 980 F. 2D 1153 (1992) and to answer the questions of whether it is lawful to monitor the telephone conversation of an employee if the employee has given prior consent and to answer if in this case whether Deal give her employer consent in this case? This study will additionally examine whether due to the recent burglary of the store, whether the employer had a legitimate business reason to record and review the employee's phone calls made or received at work. Finally, this study will consider what, under the Watkins precedent, is the extent to which an employer can monitor personal phone calls to employees within the ordinary course of business exemption of the federal wiretapping law where is no evidence of express consent here.

Background

The basis of the complaint filed in case Deal V. Spears United States Court Of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 980 F. 2D 1153 (1992) is Title II of the Omnibus Crime control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510-2520 (1988 & Supp. II 1990). It is reported that the Plaintiff, Sibbie Deal, and Calvin Lucas seek damages against Deal's former employers, namely the defendants, Newell, and Juanita Spears dba the White Oak Package Store, for the "intentional interception and disclosure of plaintiff's telephone." (United States Court Of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 1992) Following a bench trial in this case, the District Court made a statutory award to Plaintiffs in the amount of $40,000 and the request for attorney fees in accordance with Title III's fee-shifting provision was granted. The Plaintiff cross-appealed the case on the issue of the court having refused to award punitive damages. The decision was affirmed by the higher court.

The Issues & The Decision of...

Deal was not informed by the Spears that they were monitoring the telephone but instead only threatened to do so attempting to cut down on the personal telephone calls from work. Furthermore, the couple appeared clearly convicted that Deal would not know they the phone was being monitored and that they had hoped to catch her admitting some part in the store robbery that had occurred. Deal stated that whenever the Spears picked up on the telephone line that she knew someone was on the line because there was a click that could be clearly heard when they did pick up the telephone receiver. The court stated in its opinion of the case "Given these circumstances, we hold as a matter of law that the Spears have failed to show Deal's consent to the interception and recording of her conversations." (United States Court Of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 1991) The Spears failed to learn anything of the store burglary but did learn that Deal was having an affair with Newell and that Deal had sold Newell some beer at cost, which was strictly prohibited by store policy. It was for this act that Deal was fired on August 13, 1990. Mike Deal stated in his testimony that Juanita Spears had divulged information that was general in nature about the tapes. Pam Lucas stated in her testimony that Spears had related the tape contents to her but only after, she was specifically asked. Pam additionally stated in her testimony that Juanita Spears had told Sibbie Deal that she had better drop a worker's compensation claim she had made against the store lest things get really ugly. Interestingly Pam also stated that Spears never told her what was on the tapes and she testified that the tapes were discussed in general terms…

Sources used in this document:
References

Deal V. Spears United States Court Of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 980 F. 2D 1153 (1992)
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Employee Privacy Torts
Words: 7119 Length: 25 Document Type: Research Paper

Employee Privacy Torts Issues relating to employee privacy have been at the forefront of businesses for many years. This has been fuelled by the dynamic workplace which changes constantly and also by employees and employers being more litigation-conscious. Technology has also spurred on employee privacy issues with e-mail and the internet being related to heightened concerns about vulnerability of employers to litigation. Many employers have thus exacerbated their concerns relating to

Employee Privacy Torts
Words: 8246 Length: 25 Document Type: Research Paper

Employee Privacy Torts History of Employee Privacy Changing Trends of Employee Privacy Impact of Innovative Technology on Employee Privacy Role of Social Media towards Employee Privacy Impact of Changing Community/Society on Employee Privacy Adaptation to the new Environment pertaining to Employee Privacy Employee Monitoring and Surveillance Laws and Employer Policies for Text Messaging and Social Media Electronic Communication Privacy Act Monitoring of Employee Conversations over Telephone & Email Recommendations for creating Effective Policies Future Implications of Employee Privacy As years have passed and

Employee Privacy Balancing Employee Privacy
Words: 832 Length: 3 Document Type: Thesis

This will prevent visitation to illicit websites such as pornographic and gambling websites; prevent usage of ecommerce sites such as Amazon or Ebay; or to prevent the use of general recreational or social sites such as Facebook and Myspace. Other companies may elect, with all legal protection, to prevent any web navigation beyond those sites which are essential to conducting business. Why do companies implement e-mail and Internet use policies? Most

Employee Privacy Since the 1992
Words: 969 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Proposal

Employers may unequivocally monitor any message that utilizes company-provided email" (Sherman, 2007, pg. 649). Problems arise when the employer attempts other methods monitoring as Sherman notes; "The law is not clear, however, when an employer accesses an employee's webmail" (Sherman, pg. 649). Similar to the Deal v Spears case, the employer must take certain precautions in order to secure the right of monitoring. Many companies have developed policies and

Employee Privacy Business Report the
Words: 1224 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

This could be construed as a part of the atmosphere that exists in the work place. At which point, entity / individual can sue the employer for violating the law, by not properly monitoring their employees' email and internet activities. ("Workplace Privacy and Employee Monitoring" 2010) However, a larger concern that employers have is any email sent to someone by an employee can become a problem for them in the

Employee Privacy Avoid Liability Invasion Privacy Essay
Words: 546 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Employee Privacy Avoid liability invasion privacy Essay Question: List discuss ways employers avoid liability invasion privacy. Essay 350 words length APA format. There -text citation essay. List and discuss different ways employers can avoid liability for invasion of privacy Employers often justify intrusions into employee privacy based upon safety concerns: concerns about jeopardizing the health of the public can be used to allow drug and alcohol tests. Even lifestyle habits may be restricted,

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now