Abstract
Social power dynamics can have a profound impact on the way people view and interact with each other. Specifically, the objectification of social targets is a common phenomenon that occurs when individuals in positions of power approach others solely based on their usefulness, without regard for their other human qualities. This phenomenon has been studied extensively by scholars such as Gruenfeld et al. (2008) and Van Kleef et al. (2008), who have demonstrated that power can lead to a lack of compassion for the suffering of others. The present research study, seeks to further investigate the relationship between power and objectification, and to explore the underlying psychological mechanisms that drive this phenomenon. The study involved 24 participants from Texas Tech University, aged 18 to 27, randomly assigned to two groups of 12. The participants were given a consent form and asked to answer a question about power dynamics before completing two tasks, which involved snapping their fingers and drawing a capital letter E on their forehead. The researchers took note of whether each participant was in a low or high power situation during the study. The study aimed to examine the relationship between power and objectification, specifically whether individuals in a high power situation would be more likely to objectify others than those in a low power situation. By shedding light on this important topic, the researchers hope to contribute to a greater understanding of the ways in which power dynamics shape our social interactions, and to identify potential avenues for intervention and change. This study could have significant implications for understanding the relationship between power and objectification and contributes to a deeper understanding of how power dynamics impact objectification experiences.
Keywords: power dynamics, objectification theory, social targets, lack of compassion
Introduction
The issue of power and its impact on social perception is important because it affects how people view and treat one another in various social contexts. When powerful individuals objectify others, they may treat them as means to an end rather than as individuals with inherent value and dignity. This can have negative consequences for the objectified individuals, leading to feelings of dehumanization, decreased self-esteem, and even physical and mental health problems. Furthermore, objectification can perpetuate and reinforce social inequalities, with powerful individuals using their status to maintain dominance over those who are less powerful.
The problem of power and its effect on social perception has been a topic of interest in social psychology for decades. The idea that powerful individuals may be more likely to objectify others, focusing on their usefulness rather than their inherent human qualities, has been explored by several researchers...
The study is justified because it seeks to provide insights into the relationship between power and objectification, an important issue in social psychology. Specifically, the study aims to test the idea that power leads to objectification of social targets, regardless of their other human qualities. This is an important issue to investigate because objectification can lead to negative consequences, such as reduced empathy and increased aggression towards social targets.
Hypothesis
It is expected that participants in high power conditions will demonstrate a greater tendency towards objectification of social targets than those in low power conditions.
Contribution
This study is an important contribution to the literature on power and objectification, and has the potential to inform interventions aimed at reducing the negative consequences of objectification. The findings from this study could potentially inform interventions aimed at reducing the negative consequences of objectification, such as promoting awareness of power dynamics in social situations or providing education on healthy communication and relationship-building. There is also the potential for this study to inform broader social and cultural shifts towards reducing the prevalence of objectification and…
References
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understandingwomen's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of women quarterly, 21(2), 173-206.
Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and theobjectification of social targets. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(1), 111.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, andinhibition. Psychological review, 110(2), 265.
Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2013). Compliant sinners, obstinate saints: How power and self-focusdetermine the effectiveness of social influences in ethical decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 635-658.
Van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., Van Der Löwe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008).
Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological science, 19(12), 1315-1322.
Power and Organizations a Case Study Power and Organizations: A Case Study Who is in charge is a huge element that determines the organizational structure of a company. Part of understanding this notion is examining the bases of power and the delicate balance between dependency and power. The bases of power are important in understanding the organizational structure of a company and how its leadership delegates authority over the subordinates and other
Power and Weakness Robert Kagan's 2002 article entitled "Power and Weakness" which appeared in the journal Policy Review is a fine example of an argument that takes advantage of its assumptions without discussing them. The purpose of this essay is to critically analyze this source which represents a sustained reflection on the detractions, merit and implications of the author. This essay will first summarize the article by discussing the explicit and
Power Elite Then and Now A half-century after it was written, C. Wright Mills's The Power Elite remains relevant to American society. Mills's analysis of the ways in which powerful people in different sectors of society share economic interests and so share concepts and access to power remains true of the United States now. We can see many of the same dynamics at work in this election year, for while some of
Pluralism is a theory that states "…groups with shared interests influence public policy by pressing their concerns through organized effort." (Edwards, 2010, p.14) and the many linkage groups across America would seem to indicate that this theory is being carried out in practice as opposed to the hyper-pluralist theory in which pluralism runs wild and no one can agree with anyone else. Those institutions that can become organized in
However owners of this people were highly prohibited to mistreat them as it was against the customary law of the community to do so. The following is the list of the title given to different people in Lao community depending on their job and duty performed in the community. Huu muang (transl. "ear of the muang") - head of foreign affairs, diplomat Taa muang (transl. "eye of the muang") - scholar, wise
Power of Media in American Values Contemporary Discuss the power of the media in shaping contemporary American values. The online oxford dictionary defines media as "the main means of mass communication (television, radio, and newspapers) regarded collectively" (oxforddictionaries.com). This implies that the public globally are highly dependent on media to get information regarding what surrounds them, so is the American public (Edwards, 2001;9). In any case, the most efficient way of transmitting information
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now