Since that is the general rule and principle, why does it affect persons of color more fiercely?
Persons of color are disproportionately represented in the low strata of the SE ladder. Amongst the poor persons of color have higher percentages and are more likely to exist in extreme poverty. Since SES determines where you live to a large extent, and where you live will determine the schools to which your children can attend. Then SES becomes a limiting factor because person whose household income is low will live in government housing and may be on some government support program. These persons will also have their children attend schools within these communities' schools where there is high teacher absenteeism, poor results on standardized testing and generally poor conditions (Lee, 2002). Again, in this regard persons of color are over represented. So that a being a person of color with low SES you are very likely to not have access to quality education and there is an exacerbation of an already trying situation.
A lot of heavy weather has been made of the effect and projected effect of the digital divide. The reference to the digital divide relates to access to the internet, computers and other communicative devices with a microchip. The movement of much of the course content onto the internet and its supporting structures ensures that there is a widening inequality between those who have access and those who do not. At its most basic the initial separation takes place at the level of access to the internet and cloud computing. There are schools where the students are given computers and have ready access to internet facilities. These facilities are in the main provided through some wireless form of access. These schools pride themselves of being on the cutting edge of learning.
Within the school itself a significant part of the curriculum is delivered through the internet and assignments are turned in through a similar manner using the resources of cloud computing. Textbooks are made available digitally and tutorials are managed online. The extent of online computing at schools is such that students who fail to have internet access at home are placed in a disadvantageous position and will be trailing their colleagues in the class. It is important to underscore that this is not a question of intelligence or mental agility. It is simply a question of access to internet services. Students who have will have an advantage over those who do not have.
The access to internet services is also a function of one SES. Persons of higher incomes are able to acquire the relevant technology to have in their homes. This complements what is done in the schools. The children of these persons live in a digital world while others are on the outside looking in. Since SES differentiates access to internet facilities and persons of color are, overrepresented in the lower strata they are more likely to not go to schools with a progressive computer integration program and not have access at home. These persons will experience reduced achievement in educational pursuits. The gap is therefore widened by the digital divide.
Teacher quality is another issue that facilitates the widening of the achievement gap. Teachers are the backbone of any education system. Teachers are critical to the success of the schools and the impartation of quality education. The teacher in the school system functions more than simply to impart knowledge but the teacher is a mentor and an inspiration to many students. At this first level of mentor and inspiration, there are fewer teachers of color than there should be given the numbers of persons of color in the population. Therefore, students of color attending schools have a limited number of role models. Additionally, white teachers who have had a complete different experience from their charges of color are not always sympathetic to the challenges of students of color. Weissglass (2006) posits that white teachers often misinterpret the concerns of students of color as illegitimate and consider the students overly sensitive (p.269). What this means is that the relationship between the teacher and the student is compromised and student confidence in the teacher may be limited thus stunting the desire by the student to perform as they are not receiving adequate inspiration from the teacher.
Teachers also contribute to the problem by being poor teachers. This means that the teachers are not adequately trained to deliver the curriculum in a manner that is consistent with high quality teaching. These teachers may pass the...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now