School Voucher System
WHY WAS IT WRITTEN?
Proponents - believe voucher systems increase parent choice regarding school attendance for their children. (AFT, accessed 2002b).
Opponents - voucher systems do not give parents full choice - they are limited by size of tuition and fact that private and parochial schools can choose their students and may not admit the child in question
AFT Position - Supports the right to use private schools; opposes the use of public funds to help pay for it.
Reasons (AFT, accessed 2002b):
That money could go to public schools that are available to all children
That public school is essential to democracy
That public schools are more accountable to taxpayers than private or parochial ones
That private and parochial schools often pick their students in biased ways
That voucher systems do not improve student education
D. What research shows improves educational outcomes (AFT, accessed 2002b)
reducing class size
using best practices to teach
II. WHAT VALUES DOES IT ENDORSE?
A. This bill endorses the idea of parental choice for parents regarding how they raise their children, including the choice of educational setting for them.
B. The bill argues that parents with limited financial means by definition have fewer educational choices, since they can't afford private school tuition.
C. Critics argue that since such bills provide limited amounts of money, such a program doesn't really increase choices for most places.
1. Only $2,000 - will not cover all tuition
2. Can provide $500 for such things as tutoring, but in many places, good tutors charge $35 an hour. That would be only about 14 hours of tutoring, not enough to make much of a difference for most struggling students.
III. WHAT WOULD BE THE IMPACT OF THE BILL IF ADOPTED?
A. Overview. Although in
The reality is that our congressional representatives struggle to provide a balanced budget.
2.When they look at how much money is being spent on education, they will include the voucher program.
3. Money that goes to voucher programs cannot go to any kind of educational benefits that all students could benefit from.
B. This is of great concern to educators because many school districts are already strapped for money.
C. McCain glosses over these concerns
1. "The solution to what ails our [educational] system is not simply pouring more and more money into it." (McCain, 2001) - ignoring education's understanding that research-based solutions direct money in effective ways
2. "... they [vouchers] are an important opportunity for providing improved academic opportunities for all children, not just the wealthy." (McCain, 2001) - ignoring that the monies provided by this bill won't cover tuition and will only purchase a small amount of supplemental education.
D. The American Federation of Teachers doesn't suggest that. They suggest spending the money on proven strategies, such as smaller classrooms and using best practices as demonstrated in good research.
IV. HOW WORKABLE IS THIS BILL?
A. Milwaukee Voucher Program
1. One study shows that it cost taxpayers an extra $11 million (AFT, accessed 2002b)
2. The school district is cutting program and staff and had a $32 million budget deficit for the following year (AFT, accessed 2002b)
3. Some research sows that over $13.6 million in overpayments occurred in Milwaukee's voucher program in the first year (AFT, 2001).
B. Not all voucher problems benefit parents with the greatest financial need. A California bill to give $4,000 to parents would be for families who already have children in private schools. One critic calls it "tax relief for the well off" (AFT, 2001).
C. Problems with accountability
1. conflicts between religious schools' right to independence from federal rules and demands to measure effectiveness of the voucher program
2. research suggesting that spending money on small class size is more effective than spending money on vouchers (AFT, accessed 2002b)
D. $5.4 billion allotted to this program (Ives, 2001) that could be used to improve education for everyone
E. Some argue that tax credits for tuition might work much better (AFT, 2001), but these would not help poorer families whose incomes aren't high enough to benefit from deductions.
F. Others have proposed a…
Education Policy Reading First is a new grant program proposed by President Bush and endorse as part of the 2001 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The new program is part of Title I Part B, along with the Reading First program, which is focused on students in kindergarten through third grade. Reading First provides competitive grants directly to the local level to improve the reading readiness of preschool age
More recently, the student (and parent) demonstrations against desegregation in several southern American states after the Brown V. Board of Education decision in 1954 demonstrated how much students absorb perception and form fundamental beliefs by social learning. That is not to say that social learning should not occur within the realm of education; in fact, it is inevitable and unavoidable that it would. The issue is that education systems must
According to Sagan (and many others since his passing), the constitutional requirements that all religions be regarded equally is a perfectly appropriate social policy, but the continued deference to religious beliefs (in general) over strictly rational beliefs as an educational policy directly undermines the specific goal of teaching students to think logically and scientifically. In their view, the numerous recent attempts by various states to circumvent constitutional prohibitions against
Quality" Policy in higher education in the U.S.A. and the UK As a country, we need more citizens who are college graduates. We need their help for rebuilding the nation's economy for a global age, to make our democracy stronger, to empower millions of the citizens. Even in this contentious and divisive times, harmony is building at that instance. Labor personnel employers, social scientists, researchers, together with Washington policy makers
Nursing Education Development Policy (NEDP) for Nevada State Board of Nursing (NSBN) Assessment & Nursing diagnosis: Policy: It is mandatory for every NSBN nursing education provider to follow, sequentially, the four-hour process described by the NEDP (Nursing Education Development Policy), for approval to deliver. Failure to stick to the policy will lead to the education failing to acquire delivery approval under the NSBN. Purpose: This policy aims at supporting quality nurse education delivery
EDUCATION OF PISA MEMBERS vs. ECONOMY The relationship between economic growth and quality of education of PISA member countries 2003 and 2009 Economic Growth vs. The Quality of Education of Pisa Member Countries One of the most valuable assets for both the present and future generations is "quality education." Its achievement requires a robust commitment from everyone including teachers, governments, parents, as well as the students themselves. Therefore, this urge motivated a number
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now