Even in a bankruptcy procedure, the airlines have relatively little recourse to the assets, and GE would be free to sell or lease the airlines to others. Other leasing companies, while they don't have GE's aircraft engine business, are able to lure tax-advantaged investors (offshore, those receiving tax credits, others) who also give them a lower cost of capital; their expertise in leasing and selling planes, as well as their leverage in pricing negotiations with the major airframe manufacturers gives them an advantage that an individual airline may not have.
The ironic result of their leveraged finances and higher cost per seat mile is that they (1) cannot afford the newest, most fuel-efficient planes, (2) cannot afford to hedge their future fuel costs to the same extent as their low-cost competitors, and (3) make less money in good times (and lose more in bad times) than their low-cost competitors.
In a freely-functioning economic system, the legacy airlines would have merged or gone out of business at a faster rate than they have done up to now. Indeed, from 2001 to 2004 the U.S. airline industry lost $32 billion, or $13 on each passenger flown during that four-year period (Winston)the elements that have kept them in business include governmental factors, such as not allowing foreign airlines to own over 25% of U.S. airlines (thus making economies of international scale more difficult) and the disallowance of 'fifth freedoms,' which would allow a non-U.S. flag carrier to pick up paying passengers in one U.S. city and drop them off in another U.S. city.
A further factor which keeps the number of competitors at a high level are liberal U.S. bankruptcy laws. By shielding the bankrupt airlines from many of their liabilities, including pensions and, to a more limited degree, their leasing obligations, they allow the legacy, bankrupt airlines to compete on a lower-cost basis than their status before filing for bankruptcy and after emerging...
E. D (0), the cost of fighting crime / proportion of corrections i.e. C (P0) and the crimes / social costs / negative impacts on to offender i.e. BBFO. These different elements are important, because the combination of them is helping us to understand the total impact of crime and punishment on the economy. As a result, these different factors are used in a basic formula to comprehend the effects of
Economics Define economics Economics is defined as the study of how society allocates limited resources and goods (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2009). Resources include inputs such as labor, capital, and land and are used to produce goods. Goods include products such as food and clothing, as well as services such as those of barbers, doctors, and firefighters. Often goods and resources are deemed scarce because of society's demand for them vs. their availability (Stapleford,
Many businesses could no longer operate in this fashion and likely closed their doors leading to a rise in unemployment. This is an example of the rule that Hitler had on the Pre-World War II German economy. The people of the nation were completely subject to his policies and because the economy was in such a vulnerable position as a result of the First World War, that Hitler's policies
It is also argued that the insurance mandate is not constitutional since the government does not have the right to tell the United States citizens what products to purchase, even when these products are beneficial for them, and even less when the socio-economic impact of purchasing the respective items is questionable (Savage, 2009). Arguments against changing the direction of the policy Once again delaying any measures to restructure and resolve the two
Economic, social, and moral changes in America since the end of World War II Since the end of World War II, the American people have seen an extraordinary change in the economic, social and moral priorities of the nation and its people. Three generations have grown up since the war, each positively and negatively influenced by their parents and social change. Who They Are The WWII generation represents the most affluent elderly generation
The most prominent downsides of globalization are succinctly revealed below: the populations in the highly developed economies loose their jobs as the corporations outsource positions to more cost-effective regions the populations in the less developed economies are exploited by outsourcing corporations companies that outsource transfer quality responsibilities to other countries, meaning that the quality of the final product could be compromised diseases are more rapidly transmitted from one region to
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now