Crime Control vs. Due Process Discussion
The conservative crime control model and the liberal due process model each has its respective strengths and weaknesses, as well as their extremes. On the one hand, the crime control model concentrates on ensuring that an efficient legal system is in place that is capable of adjudicating criminal defendants in an expeditious fashion in order to get as many lawbreakers off the streets as quickly as possible to enhance social stability and public safety. At its extreme, proponents of the crime control model would argue that locking up innocent people is the harsh but acceptable price that society must pay to ensure that criminals are also identified and incarcerated, thereby removing their threats to the public good. These multiple priorities mean that individual freedoms are less important that controlling criminal activities. In addition, plea bargaining is more commonplace under the crime control model since it serves to speed up the otherwise-sluggish legal process (Burke, Carter, Fedorek et al., 2020). In sum, Jones (2010) reports that the crime control models view is that the proper role of the criminal process (and criminal justice) is to protect 'law-abiding citizens' from dangerous...
…the due process model would advocate releasing as many criminals as necessary in order to avoid incarcerating even a few or one innocent people (Jones, 2010).While a balanced, middle-of-the-road approach is seemingly an optimal strategy, it is reasonable to conclude that the due process model is preferable since it provides a valuable framework in which individual rights are protected, an outcome that serves to reinforce the equitable application of the law to all. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that because there are far more innocent people than criminals, the due process model represents the superior approach to criminal justice today…
References
Burke, A. Carter, D, Fedorek, B. et al. (2020). Introduction to the American criminal justice system. Oregon Press Books. Retrieved from https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/ccj230/.
Jones, R. (2010). Populist leniency, crime control and due process. Theoretical Criminology, 14(3), 331–347.
Within American communities with the highest crime rates, the dynamic relationship between motivated criminals and the myriad opportunities perpetually available in their communities contributes to a continuing cycle of multigenerational crime. Moreover, the simultaneous domination of criminal gang culture in conjunction with patterns of social and institutional responses to crime in poor communities on the part of the government also greatly exacerbated the problem. The Role of Parents, Society, and
Crime Control Model and the Due Process Model In this paper we shall examine and differentiate between two "ideal type" models of the criminal process: the Crime Control Model and the Due Process Model. Crime control underlines an efficient criminal procedure by means of early determination of responsibility by law enforcement representatives (Aviram, 2010). The model necessitates considerable reverence to police officers and prosecutors, the "torchbearers" of the criminal process (Feeley,
Evolution of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 Most Americans regard the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 as the most comprehensive and far-reaching anti-crime bill in the country's history. The Act, which took up more than 1000 pages and an approximate $30 billion in costs, covered an overwhelming array of areas ranging from funding for late-night youth basketball programs to a ban on
Due Process and the Significance of Interpretation The concept of "Due Process" is a uniquely American one, the significance of which has changed as much as has the societal and political times of the American nation. Today, some critics argue that Due Process is a thing of the past, what with the passing and signing into law of the National Defense Authorization Act, which authorizes the military to arrest and detain
In modern criminal procedure and practice, the Sixth Amendment also provides specific requirements of police, such as where criminal defendants express the desire to consult legal counsel. Irrespective of whether or not such a request precedes or follows the common recitation of Miranda warnings by arresting authorities, the Supreme Court has now long-regarded any expression of request for legal counsel as the immediate cut-off point of any further questioning (Colon, 2004;
The goal of modern constitutional criminal procedure is to define principles of law enforcement that protect citizens from government intrusions that are unreasonable in their effect on personal liberties, while simultaneously facilitating the reasonable enforcement of law and protection of society by prosecuting and punishing criminal conduct. One of the first principles in early American constitutional history was the idea that it was more beneficial to society and its citizens to
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now