These new testing procedures have come about as more and more people take a stand on animal testing. Drugs do not need to be tested on animals when there are other ways of accomplishing the same goals. There are even books published with medical alternative for animal testing, which indicates how many scientists hope to accomplish their work without using animals, which indicates they do not believe in it.
Some companies are relying far less on animal testing and turning to genetic testing for finer tuned results in special cases. For example, genetic testing has been used to develop several specialized cancer drugs for very specific diseases, such as leukemia and lung cancer. Genetic testing is much more accurate than animal testing, and can be used in very specific cases. Many believe genetic testing is the wave of the future, and could someday permanently and effectively replace animal testing.
In conclusion, animal testing is cruel to the animals, and serves no scientific purpose in any number of cases. The scientific community must find alternate ways to study diseases and drugs, eliminating animals from the equation. Using animals for testing indicates that we have no regard for the ." Environmental Health Perspectives 112, no. 12 (2004): 678+. Database online. Available from Questia, http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5011358425.Internet. Accessed 27 January 2007.
Guither, Harold D. Animal Rights History and Scope of a Radical Social Movement. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1998.
Microbial Substitute for Animal Testing." USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education), June 1994, 9+.
Thompson, Richard C. "Reducing the Need for Animal Testing." FDA Consumer, February 1988, 15+.
Richard C. Thompson, "Reducing the Need for Animal Testing," FDA Consumer, February 1988.
Harold D. Guither, Animal Rights History and Scope of a Radical Social Movement (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1998, 75.
Thompson.
Kris Freeman, "Toxicogenomics Data: The Road to Acceptance," Environmental Health Perspectives 112, no. 12 (2004).
This is what makes drug testing on animals so very important in the pharmaceutical industry. References Cami, Jordi. (1991). Perspectives and future on testing for abuse liability in humans. British Journal of Addiction. 86(12), p1529-1531. De Boer, Bonita. (2009). HIV Drugs, Vaccines and Animal Testing. Retrieved March 19, 2010, from Avert Web site: http://www.avert.org/hiv-animal-testing.htm Greaves, Peter, Williams, Andrew and Eve, Malcolm. (2004). First dose of potential new medicines to humans: how animals help. Nature
" [Peter Tatchell]. Thus it is clear that animal models provide unreliable and often contradictory results for pharmaceutical research experiments and also delay the development of vital drugs that could potentially save millions of humans. New Testing Methods Advancements in biotechnology have drastically impacted our understanding of diseases and the development of appropriate pharmacological interventions. 'Science-Based Toxicology' (SBT) enables us to study toxicity at the cellular level. There is definitive hope that
Animal Testing Debate ANIMAL TESTING Animal testing as well as experimenting, is a practice that has been there from the fifteenth century, even though the activity become more popular in the 1800's. Ever since individuals that realized animals could feel pain, a debate on animal testing became an issue as well as a controversial topic. Every year scientists experiment with around 100 million monkeys, rats, dogs mice, and fish in the name of
By using animals in research, and through animal research science learns how certain chemicals "interact with living systems"; this knowledge can be "translated into protection of humans, animals, and the environment from toxic levels of natural -- as well as man-made -- exposures (SOT, 6). Legal and professional accountability In Canada there are Research Ethics Boards (REBs) that have the power to authorize or reject funding for experiments with animals; when
Animal Testing Negatives of Animal Testing Outweigh Its Positives and Therefore Should Not be Allowed Many cures and treatments have been developed in the last three hundred years due to advances in medical technology. These developments are sometimes attributed partly to the fact that scientists and researchers have been able to use animals as "guinea pigs" for testing new medications or treatment methods before passing them to human volunteers. There is strong
Animal Testing: Pros and Cons Animal testing is when animals are used in scientific experiments (Richards). Most animal testing is done by universities, pharmaceutical companies, and medical schools. Most animals used for research are breed for the specific purpose of testing and few animals used for testing are captured from the wild. Some animal testing is done for basic research such as behavior studies and genetics while other animal testing is
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now