Ethics On the surface, both ethical relativism and ethical egotism are appealing theories. The ethical relativist avoids many of the problems that arise from encounters with different moral codes, and can help to eliminate some of the culture clashes and social problems inherent in the human condition. For example, when many Westerners come into contact with Middle Eastern cultures such as that of Saudi Arabia, they are tempted to pass judgment on the status of women. However, ethical relativism holds that all moral systems are valid, that ethics cannot be absolute or imposed from without. Therefore, ethical relativism is closely connected with cultural relativism. Such a stance makes it easy for people to get along and to resist fighting. "Anything goes," and "live and let live" are in fact some of the basic hallmarks of a liberal democracy and to an extent ethical relativism should always be at least entertained. On the other hand, ethical relativism has some significant problems. Using the same example as above, the status of women in many cultures is so poor as to cause direct bodily and mental harm. Women in cultures that suppress them become unwittingly dependent on men and are deprived of education and basic human rights. In many cases, the legal system supports the rights of men to beat their wives. In such cases, the ethical system used to justify the mistreatment of women has clear moral problems: how can it be ethically good to directly harm half of the population? Therefore, an attitude of "anything goes" must be tempered with common sense in order for it to work....
Equally as libertarian as ethical relativism, ethical egotism acknowledges that human nature is fundamentally self-seeking, that all persons are motivated by self-interest and that self-interest is not necessarily bad. Often, people who act out of self-interest inadvertently act in accordance with strict morals. Similarly, acting too altruistic can often give rise to problems such as inefficiency or chaos. For example, in many places where drivers yield to pedestrians both driver and pedestrian can become overly polite. The pedestrian is perfectly willing to wait while the car passes, but the car holds up the traffic behind him in order to let the pedestrian cross. In many cases, the altruistic show-down occurs where there is no crosswalk. Sometimes, the pedestrian waves to the car to indicate "Please pass," and the person in the car returns the gesture. Meanwhile thirty seconds have passed before anyone is assertive enough to make a move. If two ethical relativists were in this position, they would simply follow the laws of traffic flow: allow the bigger vehicle, already in motion, to keep going unless there was a stop sign or light. Situations that bring out ethical egotism are often less mundane than this, but generally self-interest is not always as morally problematic as some ethicists would claim.
Ethics The Divine Command theory of morality is known as a nonconsequentialist theory because this particular theory of morality is one that is not in any way based on the consequences or outcomes of specific action, but rather holds that all actions have any intrinsic rightness or wrongness. In the case of Divine Command Theory, rightness or wrongness is decided based upon whether or not a specific action can be said
Morals and Ethical Theory Morals & Ethical Theory The objective of this study is to read pages 1 -- 26 of Stephen D. Hales work entitled "This Is Philosophy" and to answer the questions of: (1) Is morality just what God tells me to do? (Divine Command Theory); (2) Is morality just my own personal code? (Egoism); and (3) Is morality just how society says we should act? (Moral Relativism) This study will state
Deontology and Consequentialism An Analysis of "Rightness" from Deontological and Teleological Perspectives Deontological ethics stems from the notion that one is obliged by duty to behave in a "moral" manner. There are a number of theories that range from moral absolutism to Divine Command theory that may be described as deontological, but each differs in its approach to "morality" even though each recognizes an "obligation" to attend to a set of rules.
EDSE 600: History and Philosophy of Education / / 3.0 credits The class entitled, History and Philosophy of Education, focused on the origin of education and the "philosophical influences of modern educational theory and practice. Study of: philosophical developments in the Renaissance, Reformation, and revolutionary periods; social, cultural and ideological forces which have shaped educational policies in the United States; current debates on meeting the wide range of educational and social-emotional
Philosophical Weaknesses The two theories, the revelation and the reason theory are quite diverse in beliefs as well as application in the real life. The revelation theory in this case is more of a divine instruction that guides the behavior of man. According to this theory, things that men do or can do are morally good or bad, or morally compulsory, permissible, or forbidden, solely because of God's will or commands.
Utilitarian Abortion Considerations: The utilitarian perspective applied to the abortion issue would focus on whether permitting or prohibiting elective abortion would contribute more positively the interests of society (Mill, 2003 p160). The principal difference between the utilitarian and deontological perspectives is that utilitarianism is wholly unconcerned with the underlying motivation for decisions. Whereas deontological formalism values the state of mind of the individual, utilitarianism focuses on the ultimate consequences of the act,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now