According to Sears (1986).The main problem with social psychology is that various researchers concentrated their efforts and study group on college students who were subjected to various laboratory tests in order to gauge their rational together with various aspects of their deliberate behaviour and thinking. Through the analysis of various contents from three renowned social psychology journals, Sears (1980) found that about 75% of their reports fitted into the original mold. The research on various college students pointed out that as compared to other adults, they have attitudes that are less -- formulated coupled with senses of self and very strong tendencies to be compliant with various levels and forms of authority. They also portrayed very unstable relationships with their peers. These differences between the college student and adults' social psychology are often amplified in the laboratory.

The organizational psychology has often been criticized for its limitation of scope. The Big Five principle of organizational psychology has often been attacked for its lack of explanation of all the human personality. Various psychologists have criticised the model for its lack of various models of personality. A perfect example being an individual's religiosity, their honesty, motivation and Machiavellianism, self-concept snobbishness and identity....

As pointed out by McAdams (1995), the Big Five has "psychology of the stranger,." The model also has both methodological and theoretical status issues.
An analysis of the breakthrough model through the use of the principle of connectivity reveals major flaws. The very first misunderstanding that comes out of the model is that according to the media, there is an implication that various if not all problems that are encountered in science can be solved by means of a single and crucial experiment that governs the issue or a new insight that is capable of overturning all the other previous knowledge. This kind of insight is referred to as the "Einstein syndrome." The problem with this principle is that the new theories of science must have a correlation with various previously attained and established empirical data and facts. In order for the principles to be considered advancements they must take into account both the previous and current data and facts. This is what makes up the principle of connectivity. Not even Einstein's theories neglected this principle. This point out the fact that the principle of connectivity is in fact broken.

Bibliography

Allport, F.H.( 1924) Social Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

McAdams, D.P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365-396