Disaster recovery refers to the IT components of the business that, in times of a disaster, need to be safeguarded so that business can be continued. Disaster recovery is more a preventive plan set in motion prior to the organization and implementation of the business than a series of actions that are followed once the disaster hits the company. Given that most companies are, to a large extent and in many ways, reliant on their IT system, and that collapse of IT system has ramifications beyond the company, disaster recovery has become a significant part of planning to today's organization.
Disasters can be classified into two areas:
Natural disasters -- for example floods, hurricanes, or earthquakes where mitigation measures ahead of time can work towards avoiding or reducing data loss and IT cessation.
Man-made disasters -- such as terrorism where surveillance and avoidance planning can also work towards mitigating and reducing possible determinable results.
Most large companies spend between 2% or 4% of their budget on disaster recovery planning, with the hope that they will avoid large losses were their business to collapse and cease to function, even for a short period of time, due to IT loss of operation and immobility to access data.
The basic principles of planning for recovering from a disaster
Disaster recovery planning (DRP) is a sublet of business continuity plan (BCP) and the two are integrated together when forming a plan for recovering from disaster. Essentially, three measures are involved. These are:
1. Preventative measures -- which are strategies that are planned and worked through to prevent an event form occurring
2. Detective measures -- where controls are put in motion for detecting potential disasters ahead of time
3. Corrective measures -- where controls are planned ahead of time in order to correct and restore the system (business continuity) planning after the disaster has occurred.
The entire plan is outfitted with recovery point objectives (RPO) (i.e. goals for recovery) and recovery time objective (i.e. optimal time limit in which recovery should occur) (RTO). All of this must be matched with the IT systems and infrastructure itself. Each IT infrastructure is then outfitted with specific plans that are most suitable for its recovery and for its system. Both RPO and RTO metrics need to be aligned t a suitable budget, and to be carefully planned in accordance with that budget particularly since some solutions are more expensive than others. Some businesses, again, may have to revert to more expensive solutions depending on their reliance on their IT system.
The most common strategies for data protection include the following:
High availability systems where data and system is replaced in an off-site area where there is continuous access to data and systems
Replication of data to an off-site system
Backups made to both a disk on- and off-site, or backups made directly to an off-site disk.
Backups made to a tape and sent at regular intervals to off site locations.
Precautionary measures that organizations implement include the following:
Anti-virus software and other security systems
Fire prevention
Backup generator and/or uninterruptible power supply to keep the system going in the case of a power failure
Surge protectors
Local mirrors of systems and use of disk protection technology
Why disaster recovery is important
With some companies possessing customers worldwide and operating in extremely competitive atmospheres, it is crucial for these organizations to respond instantly and speedily. The organizations not only have to ensure that their customers are satisfied but they have to delver timely and quality treatment. Data of these customers and issues related to them would have to be easily and rapidly accessed and, with some businesses, IT downtime may spell a spiral of ramifications where other clients are, in turn affected. Accordingly, downtime, if occurring, would not just have to be explained to one client but to exponential other individuals. For these reasons, the organization has to do it its utmost to prevent disaster, or, in the case, of disaster, deal with it as speedily and as efficiently as possible.
Another factor that demands instant and continuous processing is the nature of the work itself. Some companies have clients who rely on the organization for their computer-related problems or for data that is computer based and information has to see to these clients on a regular standard. If the IT base is unavailable, the organization may experience a significant loss of one or more - or even a chain of -valuable customers.
A break in this work may set off a toppling effect, where other companies, experiencing loss too, set off a spiral of destructive events that may cause significant loss and negative...
There is a modern emphasis, which has resulted from the experience of the economic impact of disaster, on a more extensive and 'distributed' mode of thinking about disaster recovery. This is an important factor that should be stressed as it has direct implications in terms of the economic aspects of disaster recovery planning in an increasingly networked and technologized contemporary working environment. This aspect is cogently expressed in a
Risk Management: Disaster Recovery In essence, disaster recovery has got to do with protecting an organization against events of a negative nature and their effects/impact. Such events include, but they are not limited to, failure of equipment, serious cyber attacks, and natural disasters such as hurricanes and earthquakes. All these put the operations of the organization at risk. This text concerns itself with practical risk management. In so doing, it will,
The disaster management plan will minimize the potentialities of the disaster in the areas as follows: (1) Minimizing potential economic loss; (2) Decreasing potential exposures; (3) Reducing the probability of occurrence; (4) Reduction of disruptions to operations; (5) providing an orderly recovery; (6) minimizing insurance premiums; (7) reduction of reliance on certain key individuals; (8) protecting organizational assets; (9) ensuring the safety of personnel and customer; (10) Reducing disruptions
Community Resilience and Natural HazardsAbstractCommunity resilience in the context of natural hazards refers to the ability of a community to anticipate, prepare for, respond to, and recover from the impacts of such events (Matarrita-Cascante et al., 2022). This paper defines community resilience as a multi-dimensional concept encompassing physical, social, economic, and environmental aspects. It highlights the importance of adaptive capacities and collective action in building resilience. Two case studies are
As Nielsen and Lidstone (1998) note, It is ironic that the public demands safety yet a number of cost-effective and feasible measures to mitigate disasters are not adopted by many... Such a failure of the public to adopt disaster mitigation measures has a long record in Australia (Nielsen and Lidstone 1998) This attitude is one of the reasons given for the greater emphasis on public education. In theoretical terms, the view is
Emergency Management Disasters are political occurrences; they can either destroy or glorify politicians. The spectacular temperament of disasters calls for the involvement of these chief executives and they test their leadership merits. How politicians control these rare occurrences can frame how their whole term in office receive judgments. During his last White House Press Conference, President George W. Bush was asked about the mistake he made during his reign, and among
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now