Verified Document

Dippin Dots The Business Level Case Study

However, this does not represent true innovation, and is unlikely to have a profound impact on the firm's competitors. Dippin Dots, in order to succeed, must develop ways of utilizing its core product (the dots) or the core technology of liquid nitrogen freezing, to drive innovation. One major attempt at doing this is the Dots & Cream, a product that mixes the dots with conventional ice cream. This product solves a key issue with respect to distribution in that it allows Dippin Dots to begin distribution in grocery stores. This product utilizes the core product, but that product remains visible and within a fairly normal context for the industry. However, this innovation also detracts from the uniqueness of the dots and reduces the degree of differentiation that Dippin Dots has. In addition, such a product could conceivably be matched by competitors, as a result of poor patent protections. There is also limited evidence that the market is ready to significantly embrace such a product.

Patent protection is crucial to Dippin Dots' ongoing success. The company's product uniqueness is the one competitive advantage is has. At its heart, the technology used to produce the dots is fairly simple and easily replicable. Mistakes at the outset of the company's existence led to a situation where it was unable to defend its products in court against imitators. As the result of this, any ice cream maker new or established could compete directly with Dippin Dots. This represents a major threat to the company, and highlights the need for further innovation in order to maintain market position.

The evidence therefore points to Dippin' Dots as being largely unsuccessful at developing innovative new products beyond its core dots; and the company is largely unsuccessful at fending...

These two elements would indicate that Dippin' Dots is at this point a relatively unsuccessful company. It has succeeded in growing at a fair strong rate to this point, a sign of success, but may face difficulty sustaining that growth in the future. Without the patent, any larger competitor can undercut Dippin' Dots on product or price, putting tremendous pressure on Dots to cut prices or develop innovations. The company's long-term success depends on being able to defend the uniqueness of its product against imitators, or on staying small enough to avoid attracting larger competition to the use of frozen ice cream dots.
The company has also failed to leverage key opportunities and address other key challenges. It was unable to get into McDonald's, despite a high profile partnership and a mutual target market. The company faced issues with respect to transportation -- the same issue that has kept it out of grocery stores. In addition, it was unable to reach a price point that customers would accept in an everyday context. The company has also failed to transfer its popularity with kids to adults, meaning that it must continually win new customers. This implies a difficult future for Dippin' Dots, should it fail to address these critical issues and develop new innovative products. The company's decline in the number of franchise outlets in 2006 is potentially a sign of these troubles, especially in light of slowing growth over the past several years. Growth was 8.4% in 2001, for example, but slid to 3.3% in 2004, followed by 2.7% in 2005 before declining sharply by 29.4% in 2006. These figures signal that the company needs to address its multiple issues in order to restore growth and success going forward.

Sources used in this document:
Patent protection is crucial to Dippin Dots' ongoing success. The company's product uniqueness is the one competitive advantage is has. At its heart, the technology used to produce the dots is fairly simple and easily replicable. Mistakes at the outset of the company's existence led to a situation where it was unable to defend its products in court against imitators. As the result of this, any ice cream maker new or established could compete directly with Dippin Dots. This represents a major threat to the company, and highlights the need for further innovation in order to maintain market position.

The evidence therefore points to Dippin' Dots as being largely unsuccessful at developing innovative new products beyond its core dots; and the company is largely unsuccessful at fending off new entrants, having failed to defend its patent in the court of law. These two elements would indicate that Dippin' Dots is at this point a relatively unsuccessful company. It has succeeded in growing at a fair strong rate to this point, a sign of success, but may face difficulty sustaining that growth in the future. Without the patent, any larger competitor can undercut Dippin' Dots on product or price, putting tremendous pressure on Dots to cut prices or develop innovations. The company's long-term success depends on being able to defend the uniqueness of its product against imitators, or on staying small enough to avoid attracting larger competition to the use of frozen ice cream dots.

The company has also failed to leverage key opportunities and address other key challenges. It was unable to get into McDonald's, despite a high profile partnership and a mutual target market. The company faced issues with respect to transportation -- the same issue that has kept it out of grocery stores. In addition, it was unable to reach a price point that customers would accept in an everyday context. The company has also failed to transfer its popularity with kids to adults, meaning that it must continually win new customers. This implies a difficult future for Dippin' Dots, should it fail to address these critical issues and develop new innovative products. The company's decline in the number of franchise outlets in 2006 is potentially a sign of these troubles, especially in light of slowing growth over the past several years. Growth was 8.4% in 2001, for example, but slid to 3.3% in 2004, followed by 2.7% in 2005 before declining sharply by 29.4% in 2006. These figures signal that the company needs to address its multiple issues in order to restore growth and success going forward.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Corporate Level Strategy of General Mills
Words: 664 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Week 1 The corporate level strategy of General Mills is the horizontal growth strategy. Imperatively, horizontal growth is accomplished by expanding its business operations into other geographic expanses or by expanding the range of products as well as services being offered in the prevailing market. In this regard, General Mills has expanded its business operations not just in the United States but also internationally and increasing its wide range of products

Corporate-Level Strategy at Starbucks. The
Words: 580 Length: 2 Document Type: Capstone Project

The vision statement developed by the company refers to the product it sells, which is represented by the finest coffee in the world, the position that Starbucks intends to reach, which is represented by the leadership in this industry, and its principles. Therefore, the vision statement offers numerous clues. However, the vision statement of Starbucks is not as short as it should be, and it does not seem to be very

Corporate Level Strategies Of Nestle
Words: 1700 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

Introduction Nestle is a multinational food and beverage company known for its wide range of products that cater to various consumer needs. The company operates in over 190 countries and has a strong presence in the global market. Nestle's corporate level strategies play a crucial role in ensuring its success and sustainability in the competitive business environment. One of Nestle's key corporate level strategies is diversification. The company has a diverse portfolio

Business Level and Corporate Level Strategies
Words: 1745 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Business-Level and Corporate-Level Strategies Every business in the modern world has to formulate and implement the best and most suitable strategy on how to conduct its operation. The choice of a business or corporate strategy significantly determines the success or failure of a business venture both in the short-run and in the long run. A suitable business or corporate strategy provides competitive advantage to a corporation, as well as the ability

Business Level and Corporate Level Strategies
Words: 1913 Length: 6 Document Type: Research Paper

Business-Level and Corporate-Level Strategies: Nestle Business and Corporate level Strategies Nestle Nestle Nestle is one of the world's largest manufacturers of foods, beverages, and health care products. Incorporated in 1866 by Henry Nestle in Switzerland, it is currently present in more than 130 countries of the world. Nestle manufacturers all types of foods and beverage products that meet the 24-hour needs of the general consumers from all age groups. It has more than

Business-Level and Corporate-Level Strategies: The Coca-Cola Company...
Words: 2066 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

Business-Level and Corporate-Level Strategies: The Coca-Cola Company Business level and corporate level strategies This paper analyzes the business-level and corporate-level strategies of the Coca-Cola Company in order to identify the most important strategies which have contributed to its success in the past and can help it in competing effectively in the long run. An analysis of its competitive environment has also been done in a view to assess and compare the strategies

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now